Placobdella ali, HUGHES & SIDDALL, 2007

HUGHES, J. LESLIE & SIDDALL, MARK E., 2007, A New Species of Leech from the New York Metropolitan Area, American Museum Novitates 3578, pp. 1-8 : 2-5

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3578[1:ANSOLF]2.0.CO;2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3889628C-234C-4549-8B39-DF22C17349AF

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/214301A5-3A26-4137-B77E-568F2D5E7DBA

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:214301A5-3A26-4137-B77E-568F2D5E7DBA

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Placobdella ali
status

sp. nov.

Placobdella ali , new species

External appearance ( figs. 1–9): Body ovate-lanceolate, opaque. Somites I and II uniannulate, III and IV biannulate, V–XXIV triannulate, XXV biannulate at margin though uniannulate medially, and XXVI sufficiently subdivided to be biannulate at margin although uniannulate, and XVII biannulate. Base color brown. Anterior medial light stripe, II–V, fading to VII ( figs. 1, 3). Two to four pairs paramedial brown stripes from III to X ( figs. 1, 3, 6). Medial dark interrupted stripe from X to anus ( figs. 1, 4). Midbody metameric pigmented marginal patches on annulus a2. Venter smooth, with 10–12 lateral brown stripes extending to margins ( figs. 2, 5). Green chromatophores randomly arranged on dorsum and venter. Midbody annuli ventrally subdivided. Male gonopore conspicuous at XI/XII, female gonopore conspicuous at XIIa2/a3 ( fig. 5). Caudal sucker pigmented except at positions of 14 radiating rows of three tubercules and secondary papillae. Two pairs of eyespots (in II and III) in typical placobdellid arrangement.

Three most prominent longitudinal tubercular rows include: one row irregular medial series on a1, a2, and a3, largest on a2, from VIIIa2 through XXIIa3; two rows irregular lateral paired series always on a2 from VIa2 through XXIVa2, often on a3 from XVI through XXII (excepting IXX), occasionally on a1, largest on a2 and often with laterally associated simple pointed papillus ( figs. 1, 4, 11). In addition to preceding three rows, less prominent marginal row of tubercules usually, but not always, on a2 from XXIIa2 through XXIIa2 (excepting IXX). Medial prominent row of tubercules replaced posteriorly ( fig. 7) by paired inner paramedial rows in XXIII and XXIV. These, and lateral series together, replaced by outer paramedial paired series in XXV–XXVII. Midbody annuli warty, each typically with 23–28 irregularly spaced (i.e., not forming regular series) secondary tubercules and minor papillae not forming series described above: normally two tubercules bracketing single pigmented papillus on either side of a2 between the medial and lateral prominent tubercular series. Typically three or more tubercules on a1 and a3 between the medial and lateral prominent tubercular series. Marginal papillae prominent ( figs. 9, 11). Tubercules stellate ( fig. 8), bearing a full cap of five to six sensory papillae. Midbody annuli weakly subdivided between tubercules. Ventral blood vessel unusually prominent, visible in a live leech under transilluminating light ( fig. 6).

Alimentary tract ( fig. 10): Proboscis muscular, not strongly tapered, unlooped when retracted, base at X/XI. Salivary cells arranged in two pairs of glands; medial glands clubshaped, extending anteriorly to VIIIa2; lateral glands from IX to X, bilobed, posterior lobe three times larger than anterior lobe. Pair of short lateral cecate mycetomes from esophagus in IX/X only. Six pairs foliaceous gastric caeca ( figs. 5, 6) including postcaeca, first pair occupy XI–XIV. Four pairs intestinal caeca. Anus in furrow between the two annuli (between a1/2 and a3) of XXVII.

Reproductive anatomy ( fig. 10): No common oviduct. Ovarian lobes from XIIa2 to XVII, with robust accessory anterior lobe from bifurcation in XIII anteriorly to XII. Male atrium weak, in XI giving rise ventrally to male ducts. Ventral blood vessel same color and thickness as (and easily confused with) ovaries in posterior somites. Male ducts strongly coiled, robust, restricted to XI and XII. Testisacs in six intersegmental pairs.

TYPE LOCALITY: Silver Mine Lake , 41 ° 17 9 69N, 74 ° 03 9 50W, Orange County, New York, 216 m.

TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype, collected on 17 June 2006, AMNH Annelida 5327 . Additional material, paratypes, dissected, AMNH Annelida 5328, 5329 .

ETYMOLOGY: Noun in apposition in honor of our field assistant Ali.

HOSTS: Unknown, although blood was found in gastric caeca of some specimens.

REMARKS: Placobdella ali resembles P. papillifera , P. ornata , P. multilineata , and P. burresonae in that all are papillated species of this genus. The highly regular papillation patterns of Placobdella multilineata (Yang and Davies, 1984) and P. burresonae ( Siddall and Bowerman, 2006) easily differentiate the two from P. ali . Additionally, P. multilineata and P. burresonae have weakly developed salivary glands in contrast to those of P. ali and most other species in this genus.

A close comparison of the external morphology of P. ornata and P. ali is hampered by the vague and often contradictory species accounts for P. ornata . Both have heavily papillated dorsal surfaces with tubercules bearing full caps of senory papillae ( Moore, 1901). The most prominent tubercules of P. ornata form three to seven longitudinal series on the dorsal surface ( Verrill, 1874; Moore, 1901; Miller, 1929), although Sawyer (1972) suggested that the tubercules are more randomly arranged. Furthermore, P. ali has 10– 12 longitudinal ventral stripes, whereas P. ornata has no organized ventral pigmentation pattern ( Verrill, 1874; Sawyer, 1972). Placobdella ornata and P. ali also are easily distinguished on the basis of their salivary gland morphology. The lateral salivary gland of P. ali is bilobed, with the posterior lobe being significantly larger than the anterior lobe. In contrast, the lateral salivary gland of P. ornata is bilobed, with each lobe being roughly the same size ( Siddall, 1991; Moser and Desser, 1995).

In terms of external appearance, P. papillifera is the species most similar to P. ali of all of the papillated Placobdella species. Both are heavily papillated, with large tubercules forming longitudinal rows. Both have papillated caudal suckers, a posterior bifurcation of the medial turbercular series into paramedial series, and both have striped venters. However, even in these characters there remain substantial differences. The tubercules of P. papillifera are simple cones, bearing at most three sensory papillae ( Verrill, 1872; Moore, 1952; Meyer and Moore, 1954; Sawyer, 1972). The tubercules of P. ali typically bear a full cap of five to six sensory papillae. The medial and paramedial rows of tubercules are restricted to the neural annuli (a2) of P. papillifera ( Meyer and Moore, 1954; Davies and Wilkialis, 1982); in contrast, the medial and paramedial series of P. ali include tubercules on all midbody annuli. The medial row of papillae on P. papillifera is replaced posteriorly by two inner paramedian rows at XXIV ( Meyer and Moore, 1954). This is also characteristic of P. multilineata and P. burresonae ( Siddall and Bowerman, 2006) . The medial series of P. ali also splits paramedially in XXIII and XXIV, but then deviates to a pair of outer paramedial rows anterior to the anus in XXVII, a character apparently unique to this species.

Absolute comparison to P. papillifera is no longer possible owing to the dried and contracted state of Verrill’s holotype (see Moore, 1952 and Meyer and Moore, 1954). Nonetheless, with respect to external anatomical characters, Meyer and Moore (1954) convincingly rediscovered and redescribed Clepsine papillifera (sensu stricto—there were four varieties detailed by Verrill, two of which eventually proved to be species of Helobdella ). The redescription of P. papillifera by Meyer and Moore (1954) was based on leeches collected in Manitoba, Canada, and was later corroborated by additional material collected by Davies and Wilkialis (1982). Sawyer and Shelley (1976) detailed a southern variant of P. papillifera from the Carolinas, complete with a description of the internal anatomy. They admitted to some reservation regarding the identification ( Sawyer and Shelley, 1976: 69), and with good reason. The leech from South Carolina had no distinct rows of papillae ( Sawyer and Shelley, 1976) and apparently no middorsal series. Furthermore, the ventral stripes were described as blue, like those of P. parasitica , not brown. Regardless of the status of the leech described by Sawyer and Shelley (1976), it can still be differentiated from P. ali on the basis of those external characters as well as internal anatomy. The male reproductive ducts of P. ali are limited to somites XI and XII only, whereas the sperm ducts of P. papillifera (s.l.) descend to XIV. Additionally, the ovaries of P. papillifera (s.l.) extend to XX, and the anterior ovarian lobe splits off in XV. The ovaries of P. ali are shorter, terminating at XVII/XVIII, and the anterior lobe splits off in XIII.

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF