Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco Schltdl.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.571.3.1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7295746 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A787AC-2F69-FFD4-82D1-E34CC4919011 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco Schltdl. |
| status |
|
Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco Schltdl. View in CoL View at ENA in Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 19(21): [137]. 1861.
≡ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco subsp. quebraco-blanco View in CoL . ≡ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco var. quebraco-blanco View in CoL . ≡ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco f. quebraco-blanco View in CoL . ≡ Macaglia quebracho-blanco (Schltdl.) A.Lyons, Pl. Nam. View in CoL , ed. 2: 286. 1907.
Lectotype (designated here): —Tab. 5B, illustration: Schltdl., Bot. Zeitung, 1861. Epitype (designated here): — ARGENTINA. Corrientes: Esquina, 47 km W de Sauce , Ruta 126, 23 Out 1977, O. Ahumada et al. 1475 ( MBM [No. 55705 !]; isoepitypes: CTES, MO [barcode MO-2958772], RBR [barcode RBR00002131 image!]) .
= Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco var. pendulum Speg. in Speg. & Girola, Cat. Descr. Maderas: 391. 1910. Neotype (designated here): — ARGENTINA. Santiago del Estero: Río Hondo, La Puerta, Ruta Nac. 9, 42 km W de Santiago del Estero, 21 Aug 1971, A. Krapovickas 19603 (F [barcode V0421371 F image!]; isoneotypes: IAC [No. 22547!], LL [barcode 00522884 image!], SI [barcode 094161 image!]).
= Aspidosperma quebrachoideum Rojas Acosta, Essai View in CoL d’une Therapeutique Vegetale de Corrientes: 21. 1913. Neotype (designated here): — ARGENTINA. Corrientes: Empedrado , Puente Dercabezado, 23 Jul 1954, T.M. Pedersen 2748 (US [barcode 03230109 image!]; isoneotypes: C [No. L6 /84/No93 image!], CTES, U [QR code U.1078817 image!]).
= Aspidosperma crotalorum Speg. View in CoL in Physis (Buenos Aires) 3(15): 334. 1917. ≡ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco f. spegazzinianum Markgr. in Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 13(119): 467. 1937. Syntype [perhaps holotype]:— ARGENTINA. Formosa: Monte Yponá, Jan 1887, C.L. Spegazzini s.n. [C.L. Spegazzini [1601]] (LP (mounted on four herbarium sheets) [barcode 002808 image!, barcode 002809 image!, barcode 002810 image!, barcode 002811 image!]).
= Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco f. malmeanum Markgr. in Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 13(119): 467. 1937. Syntype [perhaps holotype]:— PARAGUAY. [Concepción]: Colonia Risso, pr. Río Apa, 8 Oct 1893, G.O.A. Malme s.n. (S [No. S12-16372 image!]).
“ Aspidosperma quebracho ” Schltdl. View in CoL in Griseb., Plantae Lorentzianae: 155. 1874, orth. var.
“ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco f. schlechtendalianum ” Markgr. in Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 13(119): 467. 1937, a designation not validly published.
“ Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco f. tendalianum ” Markgr., mss. in sched.
“ Macaglia quebracho ” (Schltdl.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. View in CoL 2: 416. 1891, a combination not validly published.
Notes —Schlechtendal (1861) indicated a gathering from Argentina by Burmeister for A. quebracho-blanco . However, since the plate presented in its protologue is the only extant element of the original material, we elected it as the lectotype of A. quebracho-blanco . In addition, in order to facilitate the species identification, once the lectotype only presents follicles and seeds, we selected a specimen with leaves, flowers, and follicles as the epitype of A. quebrachoblanco (MBM No. 55705) (ICN article 9.9; Turland et al. 2018). Thus, the lectotype presented here supersedes the neotype designated by Morales (2010).
Also, since Spegazzini & Girola (1910) did not explicitly indicate any gathering in the protologue of A. quebrachoblanco var. pendulum , we understand that this name has no nomenclatural type attached to it. According to the ICN article 9.13 ( Turland et al. 2018): “If no original material is extant or as long as it is missing, a neotype may be selected.”. Therefore, we elected a specimen with follicles as the neotype of A. quebracho-blanco var. pendulum (F barcode V0421371F) (ICN article 9.13; Turland et al. 2018). Rojas-Acosta (1913) also did not explicitly indicate any gathering in the protologue of A. quebrachoideum , so, we followed the same criterion to select the neotype of A. quebrachoideum ( US barcode 03230109) (ICN article 9.13; Turland et al. 2018).
Lastly, according to the ICN article 26.2 ( Turland et al. 2018), infraspecific designations (e.g., “ A. quebrachoblanco f. schlechtendalianum ”) that were intended to include the type of the species to which they were assigned (e.g., A. quebracho-blanco ) were not validly published whenever the intraspecific epithets were not the same as the specific.
| MBM |
Myanmar, Yangon, Hlawga Park, Forest Department, Biodiversity Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco Schltdl.
| Castello, Ana Carolina Devides, Pereira, Andreza Stephanie De Souza, Shimizu, Gustavo Hiroaki, Zuntini, Alexandre Rizzo, Simões, André Olmos & Koch, Ingrid 2022 |
Aspidosperma quebracho ”
| Griseb. 1874: 155 |