Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4974.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0CCA430E-5601-42CB-847F-87B22BFD3112 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4891082 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA66BA10-FFFD-FFDD-0DF1-0DA005E8D5FD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-05-20 11:24:58, last updated 2024-11-26 21:55:03) |
scientific name |
Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834 |
status |
|
Genus Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834
Neotropical Forest Lizards
Figs. 22–23 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23
Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834:36 . Type species: Tiliqua fasciatus Gray, 1831:71 , by subsequent designation ( Fitzinger 1843:23).
Microlepis Gray, 1839:334. Type species: Microlepis undulata Gray, 1839:334, by original designation.
Camilia Gray, 1845:118 . Type species: Tiliqua jamaicensis Gray, 1839:293 , by original designation.
Diagnosis. Species of Diploglossus have (1) claw sheath, present or absent, (2) contact between the nasal and rostral scales, present or absent, (3) scales in contact with the nasal scale, 5–6, (4) postnasal scales, 1–2, (5) position of the nostril in the nasal scale, posterior, (6) keels on dorsal body scales, present or absent, (7) digits per limb, five, (8) longest toe lamellae, 8–18, (9) dorsal scale rows, 88–99, (10) relative head width, 9.20–19.0, (11) relative rostral height, 49.6–62.1, (12) relative frontonasal length, 2.11–4.44, (13) relative interparietal distance, 0–0.658, (14) relative axilla-groin distance, 52.8–76.6.
From Ophiodes , we distinguish Diploglossus by the digits per limb (five versus none, because of lack of limbs in Ophiodes ), number of lamella on longest toe (8–18 versus none, because of lack of limbs in Ophiodes ), and the number of dorsal scales (88–99 versus 130–171).
Content. Ten species ( Table 3 View TABLE 3 ): Diploglossus delasagra , D. fasciatus , D. garridoi , D. lessonae , D. microlepis , D. millepunctatus , D. monotropis , D. montisserrati , D. nigropunctuatus , and D. pleii .
Distribution. Diploglossus occurs throughout Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Montserrat, as well as in Lower Central America and South America including Malepo Island ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ). The map does not include the distribution of Diploglossus microlepis , which is unknown.
Etymology. The generic name is a masculine noun formed from the Latin words diplo (two) and glossus (tongue), meaning two tongues, referencing the two forms of papillae found on the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue.
Remarks. Diploglossus is a monophyletic clade with a Bayesian support value of 100% and a ML bootstrap value of 81% ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Our molecular phylogeny includes six of the ten species of Diploglossus ( D. delasagra , D. garridoi , D. lessonae , D. monotropis , D. nigropunctuatus , and D. pleii ).
Fitzinger L. J. (1843) Systema reptilium. Fasciculus primus, Amblyglossae. Braumu ¨ ller et Seidel, Vindobonae, 106 pp. [in Latin]
Gray, J. E. (1831) A synopsis of the species of Class Reptilia. In: Griffith, E. & Pidgeon, E. (Eds.), The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organisation by the Baron Cuvier with additional descriptions of all the species hither named, and of many before noticed, V Whittaker, Treacher and Co., London, pp. 1 - 481 + 1 - 110.
Gray, J. E. (1839) Catalogue of the slender-tongued saurians, with descriptions of many new genera and species. Annals & Magazine of Natural History, Series 1, 2 (11), 331 - 337. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933909512395
Gray, J. E. (1845) Catalogue of the specimens of lizards in the collections of the British Museum. British Museum, London, xxvii + 289 pp.
Wiegmann, A. F. A. (1834) Herpetologia Mexicana seu descriptio amphibiorum novae Hispaniae. Pars prima saurorum species. Luderitz, Berlin, 54 pp.
FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree of diploglossid lizards based on sequences of nine genes: four mitochondrial genes (CytB, ND2, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA) and five nuclear genes (AMEL, BDNF, PLPR, RAG1, and ZFP36). Maximum likelihood tree obtained from the nine-gene dataset (59 individuals; 6,949 sites).A scale bar indicates 5% sequence divergence. The numbers at nodes are ML bootstrap values, followed by Bayesian posterior probabilities; asterisks indicate significant (≥ 95%) support, and a dash or zero value indicates weak (<50%) support. The tree is rooted with Pseudopus apodus (Anguidae).
FIGURE 22. Images of (A) Diploglossus delasagra (USNM 512237, SVL 81.3 mm; photograph by S. B. Hedges), (B) Diploglossus garridoi (MNHNCU 4420,SVL 103mm;photograph byS.B.Hedges),(C)Diploglossus monotropis (photograph by Sebastian Lotzkat), (D) Diploglossus montisserrati (photograph by Agnieszka Ogrodowczyk), (E) Diploglossus nigropunctatus (USNM 512241, SVL 111 mm; photograph by S. B. Hedges), and (F) Diploglossus pleii (USNM 326931; photograph by S. B. Hedges).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Anguioidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Diploglossinae |
Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834
Schools, Molly & Hedges, S. Blair 2021 |
Camilia
Gray, J. E. 1845: 118 |
Gray, J. E. 1839: 293 |
Diploglossus
Fitzinger L. J. 1843: 23 |
Wiegmann, A. F. A. 1834: 36 |
Gray, J. E. 1831: 71 |
1 (by plazi, 2021-05-20 11:24:58)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-05-20 11:39:49)
3 (by carolina, 2021-06-01 17:31:04)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-06-01 17:43:08)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-09-19 03:33:16)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-10-20 03:11:35)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-02 10:49:50)