Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834

Schools, Molly & Hedges, S. Blair, 2021, Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the Neotropical forest lizards (Squamata, Diploglossidae), Zootaxa 4974 (2), pp. 201-257 : 236-237

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4974.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0CCA430E-5601-42CB-847F-87B22BFD3112

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA66BA10-FFFD-FFDD-0DF1-0DA005E8D5FD

treatment provided by

Plazi (2021-05-20 11:24:58, last updated by GgImagineBatch 2021-05-20 11:27:15)

scientific name

Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834
status

 

Genus Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834

Neotropical Forest Lizards

Figs. 22–23

Diploglossus Wiegmann, 1834:36 . Type species: Tiliqua fasciatus Gray, 1831:71 , by subsequent designation ( Fitzinger 1843:23).

Microlepis Gray, 1839:334. Type species: Microlepis undulata Gray, 1839:334, by original designation.

Camilia Gray, 1845:118 . Type species: Tiliqua jamaicensis Gray, 1839:293 , by original designation.

Diagnosis. Species of Diploglossus have (1) claw sheath, present or absent, (2) contact between the nasal and rostral scales, present or absent, (3) scales in contact with the nasal scale, 5–6, (4) postnasal scales, 1–2, (5) position of the nostril in the nasal scale, posterior, (6) keels on dorsal body scales, present or absent, (7) digits per limb, five, (8) longest toe lamellae, 8–18, (9) dorsal scale rows, 88–99, (10) relative head width, 9.20–19.0, (11) relative rostral height, 49.6–62.1, (12) relative frontonasal length, 2.11–4.44, (13) relative interparietal distance, 0–0.658, (14) relative axilla-groin distance, 52.8–76.6.

From Ophiodes , we distinguish Diploglossus by the digits per limb (five versus none, because of lack of limbs in Ophiodes ), number of lamella on longest toe (8–18 versus none, because of lack of limbs in Ophiodes ), and the number of dorsal scales (88–99 versus 130–171).

Content. Ten species ( Table 3): Diploglossus delasagra , D. fasciatus , D. garridoi , D. lessonae , D. microlepis , D. millepunctatus , D. monotropis , D. montisserrati , D. nigropunctuatus , and D. pleii .

Distribution. Diploglossus occurs throughout Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Montserrat, as well as in Lower Central America and South America including Malepo Island ( Fig. 23). The map does not include the distribution of Diploglossus microlepis , which is unknown.

Etymology. The generic name is a masculine noun formed from the Latin words diplo (two) and glossus (tongue), meaning two tongues, referencing the two forms of papillae found on the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue.

Remarks. Diploglossus is a monophyletic clade with a Bayesian support value of 100% and a ML bootstrap value of 81% ( Fig. 2). Our molecular phylogeny includes six of the ten species of Diploglossus ( D. delasagra , D. garridoi , D. lessonae , D. monotropis , D. nigropunctuatus , and D. pleii ).

Fitzinger L. J. (1843) Systema reptilium. Fasciculus primus, Amblyglossae. Braumu ¨ ller et Seidel, Vindobonae, 106 pp. [in Latin]

Gray, J. E. (1831) A synopsis of the species of Class Reptilia. In: Griffith, E. & Pidgeon, E. (Eds.), The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organisation by the Baron Cuvier with additional descriptions of all the species hither named, and of many before noticed, V Whittaker, Treacher and Co., London, pp. 1 - 481 + 1 - 110.

Gray, J. E. (1839) Catalogue of the slender-tongued saurians, with descriptions of many new genera and species. Annals & Magazine of Natural History, Series 1, 2 (11), 331 - 337. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933909512395

Gray, J. E. (1845) Catalogue of the specimens of lizards in the collections of the British Museum. British Museum, London, xxvii + 289 pp.

Wiegmann, A. F. A. (1834) Herpetologia Mexicana seu descriptio amphibiorum novae Hispaniae. Pars prima saurorum species. Luderitz, Berlin, 54 pp.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Reptilia

Order

Squamata

Family

Anguidae