Nesticus bishopi Gertsch, 1984
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1145.96724 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:830628C2-76CD-4641-BFC6-144CD775ED6B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC17DABF-EC31-5EBD-ACA0-9977D03496CA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Nesticus bishopi Gertsch, 1984 |
status |
|
Nesticus bishopi Gertsch, 1984 View in CoL View at ENA
Figs 60A-D View Figure 60 , 61A-H View Figure 61
Nesticus bishopi Gertsch, 1984: 33, figs 147-149.
Material examined.
Type material: Holotype: USA - North Carolina , Macon Co. • ♀ holotype; Highlands ; 6 Apr. 1929; S.C. Bishop leg.; AMNH; New collections from near type locality: - North Carolina , Macon Co. • ♂, 8♀; below Glenn Falls , SW of Highlands; 35.0312°N, - 83.2383°W; 2 Aug. 1992; M. Hedin leg.; • ♂, ♀; below Glenn Falls , SW of Highlands; 35.0312°N, - 83.2383°W; 31 Aug. 2002; M. Hedin, M. Lowder, P. Paquin leg.; MCH 02_175; Non type material: - Georgia, Rabun Co. • 2♀; Holcomb Branch of Holcomb Creek , off Hale Ridge Road, NE of Rabun Bald; 34.9831°N, - 83.2661°W; 14 Apr. 1992; T. McGarity leg.; • 2♂, 3♀; Hwy 246/106 along Mud Creek , NE of Dillard; 34.9924°N, - 83.3385°W; 19 Aug. 2007; M. Hedin, M. McCormack, S. Derkarabetian leg.; MCH 07_126; • 2♂, ♀; Hwy 76 at Chattooga River crossing, confluence with Pole Creek ; 34.8172°N, - 83.3061°W; 2 Sep. 2002; M. Hedin, F. Coyle, M. Lowder, P. Paquin leg.; MCH 02_181; - North Carolina , Jackson Co. • ♀; along Chattooga River , NE side between Scotsman and Glade Creek; 35.0123°N, - 83.1164°W; 13 Jul. 1992; B. Dellinger leg.; - North Carolina , Macon Co. • ♂, 8♀; 4.3 mile S Standing Indian campground, along Nantahala River ; 35.0347°N, - 83.5057°W; 10 Aug. 1992; M. Hedin leg.; • ♀, 5 imm; 4.3 mile S Standing Indian campground, along Nantahala River ; 35.0347°N, - 83.5057°W; 20 Aug. 2002; M. Hedin, F. Coyle, M. Lowder, P. Paquin leg.; MCH 02_140; • 2♂, 5♀, 2 imm; along Black Creek , NE side Chunky Gal Mountain ; 35.092°N, - 83.5663°W; 20 Aug. 2002; M. Hedin, F. Coyle, M. Lowder, P. Paquin leg.; MCH 02_141; • 2♀; Coweeta Hydrological Lab, along Shope Fork of Coweeta Creek, FR 751; 35.0611°N, - 83.4447°W; 19 Aug. 2007; M. Hedin, M. McCormack, S. Derkarabetian leg.; MCH 07_125; • ♂; Coweeta Hydrological Lab, along Shope Fork of Coweeta Creek , W of Otto; 35.0601°N, - 83.4547°W; 23 Oct. 2012; M. Hedin, J. Bond leg.; MCH 12_043; • 2♀; FR 710, 2 mi. N Deep Gap; 35.0425°N, - 83.555°W; 20 Aug. 2002; M. Hedin, F. Coyle, M. Lowder, P. Paquin leg.; MCH 02_142; • 9♀; near Dry Falls , Cullasaja River, off Hwy 64 NW of Highlands; 35.069°N, - 83.239°W; 11 Aug. 1992; M. Hedin leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
Compared to other members of the challenging Nesticus reclusus subgroup, Nesticus bishopi is similar in detail in all aspects of male and female morphology to N. stupkai (compare Figs 60A-D View Figure 60 , 61A-H View Figure 61 , 62A-H View Figure 62 ). Shared male features include a distal tegular apophysis shoe-shaped with a beak-like tip, base of distal part with a sclerotized and blade-like shoulder, proximal fork of tegular apophysis arrowhead-like, median apophysis short and triangular, paracymbium with translucent bladelike paradistal process, distal process with twisted tip, and toothlike distomedial process directly adjacent to small flange-like ventromedial process. Although we cannot find morphological characters that distinguish N. bishopi from N. stupkai , we retain both as distinct based on diagnostic DNA characters and an allopatric distribution (see further arguments in the Discussion). Both species are easily distinguished from closely-related N. reclusus by the shape of the male median and tegular apophyses (Figs 63A-F View Figure 63 , 64A-F View Figure 64 ).
Description of ♂ from near type locality
(MCH specimen #1078). Carapace dusky cream to orange, conspicuous faint dark pigment behind ocular area. Legs pale yellow to cream. Abdomen dirty pale cream, faint paired lateral pigmentation blotches. Eyes approximately equal in size, except for AMEs, ~ 1/3 width of ALEs. Eyes with rings of dark pigment. CL 1.3, CW 1.1, abdomen length 1.75, total body length 3.05. Leg I total length 9.75 (2.65, 0.55, 2.95, 2.5, 1.1), leg formula 1423, leg I / CW ratio 8.9. Palp with broadly S-shaped tegular apophysis, distal part shoe-shaped with a beak-like tip, base of distal part with a sclerotized and blade-like shoulder. Basal fork of tegular apophysis like a sclerotized broad-based arrowhead (Fig. 60A-D View Figure 60 ). Median apophysis short and triangular. Conductor tip bent, surrounded by small funnel-shaped cuticular sheath. Paracymbium with translucent bladelike paradistal process, distal process with twisted, tubular tip; well-sclerotized, toothlike distomedial process directly adjacent to small flange-like ventromedial process (Fig. 60A-D View Figure 60 ).
Variation.
Males and females from both sides of the Little Tennessee River barrier (see below) share very similar genitalic morphologies (Figs 60A-D View Figure 60 , 61A-H View Figure 61 ).
Distribution and natural history.
From montane habitats in southern North Carolina and northern Georgia. Populations are found both east (Cowee Mountains, including the type locality) and west (Nantahala Mountains) of the Little Tennessee River, a known dispersal barrier in other arachnid taxa (e.g., Thomas and Hedin 2008; Keith and Hedin 2012; Hedin and McCormack 2017). Western populations (Black Creek Road, Standing Indian, Coweeta, Deep Gap Road) indeed form a subclade on mitochondrial trees (Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ).
As an example of natural history, 1992 collections near Standing Indian Campground were made in a northwest-facing rocky ravine, where many specimens were collected "in dark ravine, wet, deep litter, rocks, Rhododendron ".
Nesticus bishopi has been collected from locations very near N. dellingeri in the Chattooga River gorge (locations near Scotsman Creek; Fig. 53 View Figure 53 ), suggesting that these species might somewhere be syntopic in this area.
Remarks.
The species is obviously morphologically very similar to a disjunct Nesticus stupkai and is arguably conspecific from a morphological perspective. We have retained N. bishopi as distinct at the species level because this taxon is monophyletic on both UCE and mitochondrial trees (Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 6 View Figure 6 ), and is geographically disjunct from sister species N. stupkai . One complication is that N. stupkai is paraphyletic with respect to N. bishopi on nuclear trees (Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ), as further discussed below.
We have made extensive collections of other Nesticus taxa in the region that separates N. bishopi from N. stupkai , finding only other Nesticus species (e.g., N. silvanus , N. cherokeensis , etc.; Fig. 53 View Figure 53 ). As such, we view the probability of on-going gene flow as low.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nesticus bishopi Gertsch, 1984
Hedin, Marshal & Milne, Marc A. 2023 |
Nesticus bishopi
Gertsch 1984 |