Mesabolivar kaingang, Huber, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4395.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B43C234D-45C4-4A6D-9836-8A7524A5B291 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5950572 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/160AC713-C63C-FFCE-2A9C-9ACF301B7FDC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mesabolivar kaingang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mesabolivar kaingang View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 259–260 View FIGURES 253–260 , 284–291 View FIGURES 284–291 , 304–305 View FIGURES 292–305
Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from known congeners by male procursus ( Figs 285, 287–288 View FIGURES 284–291 ; small dorsal process, retrolateral ridge, prolateral pointed process); also by armature of male chelicerae ( Fig. 286 View FIGURES 284–291 ; distal apophyses close to lamellae, small proximal processes) and shape of epigynum ( Figs 289–290 View FIGURES 284–291 , 304 View FIGURES 292–305 ; oval, with posterior pocket on slightly projecting ‘scape’).
Etymology. The specific name honors the Kaingang, a Native American ethnic group spread out over the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul and the southeastern state of São Paulo; noun in apposition.
Type material. BRAZIL: Paraná: ♂ holotype, 1♀ paratype, UFMG (21512–13), 10♂ 4♀ paratypes, ZFMK (Ar 19142), Saint-Hilaire/Lange National Park, forest above Hotel Mata Atlântica (25.670°S, 48.600°W), ~ 200– 300 m a.s.l., night collecting, 12.x.2014 (B.A. Huber, L.S. Carvalho).
Other material examined. BRAZIL: Paraná: 5♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Br 14-140), same data as types . 3♂ 2♀, ZFMK (Ar 19143), Saint-Hilaire / Lange National Park , forest along river above Fazenda Niteroi (25.657°S, 48.601°W), ~ 100 m a.s.l., 11.x.2014 (B.A. Huber, L.S. Carvalho) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Br 14-133), same data GoogleMaps . 4♂, SMNK ( ECS 756 View Materials , 759 View Materials ), Reserva Natural do Rio Cachoeira [~ 23.38°S, 48.70°W], 19.xi./ 15.xii.2007 (F. Raub, L. Scheuermann). GoogleMaps
Santa Catarina: 2♀, ZFMK (Ar 19144), Itapoá, Reserva Volta Velha (26°05.8’S, 48°39.1’W), 20 m a.s.l., 27– 28.ix.2010 (B.A. Huber, J. Ricetti); 4 juvs in pure ethanol GoogleMaps , ZFMK (Br 10-68), same data GoogleMaps .
Assigned tentatively. BRAZIL: Paraná: 3♂ 2♀, ZFMK (Ar 19145), São José dos Pinhais, Serro e Gemido (25°41.5’S, 49°03.4’W), ~ 1000 m a.s.l., in hollow trees, 25.ix.2010 (B.A. Huber, J. Ricetti) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Br 10-60), same data GoogleMaps . 1♀ (and one ♂ palp and ♂ chelicerae transferred from ZFMK Br 10-58), ZFMK (Ar 19146), Rio Grande , Fazenda Experimental Gralha Azul (25°40.0’S, 49°16.2’W), 910 m a.s.l., 26.ix.2010 (B.A. Huber, J. Ricetti) GoogleMaps ; 1♂ 1♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Br 10-58), same data GoogleMaps .
Description. Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 4.7, carapace width 1.7. Distance PME-PME 160 µm, diameter PME 160 µm, distance PME-ALE 150 µm, distance AME-AME 30 µm, diameter AME 60 µm. Sternum width/length: 1.2/ 0.7. Leg 1: 61.2 (14.7 + 0.8 + 14.4 + 27.3 + 4.0), tibia 2: 10.8, tibia 3: 8.9, tibia 4: 9.3; tibia 1 L/d: 90. Femora 1–4 width (at half length): 0.23, 0.25, 0.25, 0.23.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace ochre-yellow, with large dark median mark including ocular area, clypeus not darker; sternum orange; legs brown, tips of femora and tibiae lighter, indistinct darker rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen greenish gray, dorsally and laterally densely covered with dark marks, ventrally pale greenish gray with small ochre-yellow area in front of gonopore and indistinct ochre-yellow area in front of spinnerets.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 259 View FIGURES 253–260 ; ocular area raised; carapace with distinct median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum unmodified.
CHELICERAE. With distal apophyses close to lamellae, weakly projecting (not visible in lateral view), proximal processes very small ( Fig. 286 View FIGURES 284–291 ).
PALPS. As in Figs 284–285 View FIGURES 284–291 ; coxa with distinct retrolateral apophysis; trochanter barely modified; femur with hooked retrolateral apophysis proximally, distally widening; procursus with small dorsal process, distinctive retrolateral ridge and small prolateral pointed process ( Figs 285, 287–288 View FIGURES 284–291 ); genital bulb with large tapering process mostly membranous.
LEGS. Densely covered with short hairs, without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with>30 pseudosegments, distally fairly distinct.
Male (variation). Tibia 1 in 12 other males from Saint-Hilaire/Lange National Park: 13.1–16.4 (mean 14.4). Proximal cheliceral processes barely visible in some males. In males from near Curitiba (Serro e Gemido and Fazenda Experimental Gralha Azul) the proximal cheliceral processes are larger, and the procursus differs slightly (prolateral apophysis stronger, proximal part relatively more slender); specimens from these localities are therefore assigned tentatively; tibia 1 in males from Serro e Gemido: 12.9, 14.0, 15.3.
Female. In general similar to male ( Fig. 260 View FIGURES 253–260 ). Tibia 1 in nine females from Saint-Hilaire/Lange National Park and Volta Velha: 10.6–14.1 (mean 12.4). Epigynum as in Figs 289–290 View FIGURES 284–291 , 304 View FIGURES 292–305 ; simple oval anterior plate weakly projecting, without processes, with pocket at posterior margin; posterior plate short and wide. Internal genitalia as in Figs 291 View FIGURES 284–291 , 305 View FIGURES 292–305 , with pair of bean-shaped pore-plates converging anteriorly. In females from near Curitiba (Serro e Gemido and Fazenda Experimental Gralha Azul), the posterior margin of the epigynal plate is slightly straighter; they are assigned tentatively (tibia 1 in three females: 9.6, 11.7, 13.5).
Natural history. The spiders were found in large sheltered spaces among rocks and logs, and in hollow logs. At Saint-Hilaire/Lange National Park they shared the microhabitat with M. bicuspis . When disturbed they started swinging with large amplitude and high frequency but did not run away.
Distribution. Known from several sites in Paraná and Santa Catarina states ( Brazil) ( Fig. 733 View FIGURES 732–733 ); western specimens (from near Curitiba) are assigned tentatively.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |