Cratosmylus Myskowiak et al., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4581.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20A9776D-AE5F-41BC-A35B-0C5E42EDFE48 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C47176-FFD6-8D61-7AD2-07D8FE9F9613 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cratosmylus Myskowiak et al., 2015 |
status |
|
Cratosmylus Myskowiak et al., 2015 View in CoL
Type species. Cratosmylus magnificus Myskowiak et al., 2015: 28 (by original designation) ( Brazil) ( Early Cretaceous ) .
Comments. Cratosmylinae (containing only C. magnificus ) is herein excluded from Osmylidae and placed in Nymphidae following Winterton et al. (2017). In the absence of ocelli or thyridiate crossveins evident in the specimen, Myskowiak et al. (2015) noted that Cratosmylus could be placed in either Osmylidae or Nymphidae , and despite the clear similarity to Nymphidae wings, they proposed inclusion in Osmylidae rather than Nymphidae based on two characters. They argue that two features found in Cratosmylus that would otherwise place it in Nymphidae (i.e., Sc+RA with long forked veinlets and, that Sc+RA terminates beyond the apex of the wing), are also present in Osmylidae . Examining the examples given they are either incorrect, or not particularly convincing as apomorphies justifying placement in Osmylidae compared with Nymphidae . Firstly, Sc+RA with long forked veinlets is a character typical of nymphids in the subfamily Myiodactylinae and is also present not only in Porismus ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ) and in some Protosmylinae and Stenosmylinae genera, but also present in various families of Neuroptera (e.g., Hemerobiidae , Chrysopidae ); it appears therefore to be rather labile as phylogenetic character. Secondly, Sc+RA does not terminate beyond the wing apex in the lance lacewings and examples of exceptions they provide (i.e., Heterosmylus ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 ) and Arbusella ) do not exhibit this state. Indeed, this appears to be a useful diagnostic character that separates early lacewings like Osmylidae from highly derived members of Myrmeleontoidea. Myskowiak et al. (2015) do identify a mark which they interpret as nygma in the forewing. Their figure of the structure ( Myskowiak et al., 2015: fig. 6) is not very clear, nor convincing as a nygma, but if it is indeed found to be a nygma, it would better support placement of Cratosmylus in Osmylidae rather than Nymphidae . While the wing of Cratosmylus is similar to Gumillinae some respects as Myskowiak et al. (2015) suggest, the venation is more similar to Nymphidae genera in Myiodactylinae . The remaining characters in the wing could easily be autapomorphies. Makarkin et al. (2017, 2018) considered Cratosmylinae (containing two Cretaceous genera from Brazil, Cratosmylus and Araripenymphes Menon et al. ) as a separate family closely related of Nymphidae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.