Paepalanthus scleranthus Ruhland, 1903

Andrade, Maria José Gomes De, Trovó, Marcelo, Rocha, Lamarck & Giulietti, Ana Maria, 2022, Paepalanthus (Eriocaulaceae) without scapes and spathes, a survey with the description of a new species, Phytotaxa 560 (2), pp. 135-152 : 147

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.560.2.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7046984

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687A1-FFF0-9547-9FE8-2475FBF47454

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paepalanthus scleranthus Ruhland
status

 

4. Paepalanthus scleranthus Ruhland in Engler, Pflanzenr. IV.30 (Heft 13): 200. tab. 28, 1903.

Lectotype (here designated):— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Perpetua près Diamantina , entre les rochers, 11 April 1892, A.F.M. Glaziou 19990 ( B [10_0247678]! , isolectotypes BR [0000008619495]!, C [10011014]!, G [00192125]!, K [000640072]!, LE [00001220]!, P [00716724]!, P [00716725]!) .

( Figures 2F View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE4 Q-S, 6I-N).

Ruhland (1903) described Paepalanthus scleranthus based on the specimens Schwacke 11987, Ule 2714, Ule 2717 and Glaziou 19990, collected in Minas Gerais and distributed throughout many herbaria. According to the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018) and the type clarifications provided by McNeill (2014), a lectotype must be selected. Moldenke (1976a) argued that the specimen Glaziou 19990 deposited in B was the most relevant specimen used for the species description but referred all specimens as cotypes. We agree with Moldenke’s (1976a) interpretation, as among the original material, the specimen Glaziou 19990 at B perfectly matches the original description and plate and contains the original handwriting and line drawings provided by Willy Ruhland himself. It is therefore designated here as the lectotype.

Paepalanthus scleranthus ( Figure 2F View FIGURE 2 ) is restricted to the sandy soils of the campo rupestre from the Espinhaço Range in Bahia and Minas Gerais, and it is sympatric in some areas with P. leucocephalus ( Figure 3 View FIGURE 3 ). According to Ruhland (1903), it is mainly differentiated from P. leucocephalus by the blackish capitula (vs. whitish), besides a few floral variations explored in Table 2 View TABLE 2 and Figures 6 A–N View FIGURE 6 . Although in some specimens the capitulum colour is clearly distinctive, in field observations and some herbarium specimens (e.g., the lectotype housed at C) the difference may be misleading. Moldenke (1976a) had previously expressed doubts on maintaining these two taxa segregated, especially regarding the type specimens, gathered in the same area.

Based on our field observation and herbarium analysis, we decided to keep Paepalanthus scleranthus and P. leucocephalus as distinct units as detailed in the Table 2 View TABLE 2 and Figures 2 View FIGURE 2 , 4 View FIGURE4 , 6 View FIGURE 6 . The difficult in differentiating both species is mainly regarding the populations from the Diamantina Plateau (where the types came from), and a few other localities where both species are frequently found growing together. The capitulum colour variation may represent a phenological and/or ecological condition, but yet no individual presenting capitula with intermediate color or with both capitula colors was recorded. Herbarium specimens with some individuals presenting whitish capitula and other presenting blackish capitula may represent problematic field collections (a common situation in small Eriocaulaceae ), but not necessarily reflect the species delimitation. We also may keep in mind that hybrids in Eriocaulaceae may be more frequent than we expected, as exemplified in Hensold (1988). Paepalanthus being a group of recent diversification ( Vasconcelos et al. 2020) and with the relevance of the capitulum color to the reproductive biology of Eriocaulaceae ( Martins Junior et al. 2022) , further investigations along the entire species distribution, including population genetics, reproductive biology, and morphology would be of benefit to precisely establish the species circumscription.

Additional selected material examined:— BRAZIL. Bahia: Rio de Contas, Serra Marsalina , 6 October 2006, R. M . Harley et al. 55538a ( HUEFS); Rio de Contas, Serra Marsalina , 6 October 2006, R. M . Harley et al. 55538b ( HUEFS) . Minas Gerais: Catas Altas, Serra do Caraça, Ule 2717 ( B, HBG, NY); Diamantina, Biribiri , 25 March 1984, A. M . Giulietti et al. CFCR 4290 ; Ouro Preto, Ule 2714 ( B, HBG, R); Serra das Camarinhas, Schwacke 11987 ( B, BHCB); Tiradentes , Serra de São José , 21°05’S, 44°10’W, s.d., R GoogleMaps . Alves 4015 ( RB) .

B

Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet

ICN

Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

M

Botanische Staatssammlung München

HUEFS

Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana

HBG

Hiroshima Botanical Garden

NY

William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden

A

Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum

BHCB

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

RB

Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro