Coptoprepes ecotono, Werenkraut, Victoria & Ramírez, Martín J., 2009

Werenkraut, Victoria & Ramírez, Martín J., 2009, A revision and phylogenetic analysis of the spider genus Coptoprepes Simon (Araneae: Anyphaenidae, Amaurobioidinae), Zootaxa 2212, pp. 1-40 : 9-14

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.275145

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3499902

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C927878D-FFD5-CB50-5AA6-FA0AFB6BA3FD

treatment provided by

Plazi (2016-04-19 22:41:22, last updated 2024-11-24 23:51:01)

scientific name

Coptoprepes ecotono
status

sp. nov.

Coptoprepes ecotono View in CoL new species

Figs. 5–7 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 , 22 View FIGURE 22 a, 23a–c, 24a–c

Type material: Holotype: male from Argentina, Río Negro province, Bariloche, ca. 41º 0 0 S, 71º30’ W, March 1947, A. G. Giai (MACN-Ar 2218; temporary preparations MJR-01341, VIW-00014). Paratypes: female from Argentina, Neuquén province, Nahuel Huapi Natl. Park, Lago Espejo, ca. 40º 30’ S, 71º 30’ W, 21 January 1985, M. J. Ramírez (MACN-Ar 20320; temporary preparations MJR-01342, VIW-00013).

Etymology: This new species is dedicated to V. Werenkraut’s colleagues and friends from Laboratorio Ecotono , Bariloche, Argentina.

Diagnosis: Females are very similar to those of C. valdiviensis by the rather flat epigyne with rectangular, unsclerotized median field ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 g), but can be distinguished by having a longitudinally oriented profile of the anterior portion of the copulatory ducts ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 a–c). Males are similar to those of C. campanensis n. sp. by (virtually) lacking a RTA, but have a much smaller, not bifid median apophysis ( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 a–f, 23a–c).

Description: Male (holotype): Prosoma length 1.86, width 1.36, narrower in front than in female. Tibia/ metatarsus length: I, 1.06/0.91; II, 0.92/0.84; III, 0.64/0.68; IV, 1.17/1.27. Chelicerae slightly smaller than those of female, with four teeth on retromargin, three on promargin (promargin observed from MACN-Ar 2227). Sternum length 1.05, width 0.78. Spines: I, femur d 1-1-1, p 2ap; tibia v 0-2-p1; metatarsus v 2 bas. II, femur d 1-1-1, p d1ap; tibia v 0-r1-p1; metatarsus v 2 bas. III, femur d 1-1-1, p and r 0-d1-d1; patella r d1; tibia v p1-2-2, p 1-d1-1-0, r d1-1, d 0; metatarsus v 2 -p1-2 plus apical comb, p and r d1-1-1, d 0-p1- 2. IV, femur d 1-1-1, p 0-d1-d1, r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v 2-2 -2, p and r 1-d1-1-0, d 0; metatarsus v 2-2 -2 plus apical comb, p and r d1-1-1, d 0-2-2. Opisthosoma length 2.20, spiracle–epigastrium 1.15, spiracle–spinnerets 0.18. Color in ethanol ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ): As in female, but paler, specimen faded (as well as male MACN-Ar 2227). Palp ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ): Tibia short, width/length 1.00, RTA reduced to short acute relict. Cymbial conductor wide. Tegulum only visible in retrolateral view. Sperm duct with conspicuous loop on anterior-dorsal margin. Embolus long, thin, basal process elongate, flat, transparent. Median apophysis thin, hook-shaped. Primary conductor with long canal, ventral border tiny, cuticular hair-like extensions, tip acute, elongate, directed forward. Secondary conductor well sclerotized, apical, without canal, contiguous to anterior-dorsal sperm duct loop. Paramedian apophysis absent, area only slightly sclerotized ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 a–c).

Female (paratype): Prosoma length 1.82, width 1.29. Tibia/metatarsus length: I, 0.93/0.80; II, 0.83/0.78; III, 0.72/0.86; IV, 1.11/131. Chelicerae with four teeth on retromargin, four on promargin. Sternum length 1.05, width 0.76. Spines: leg I, femur d 1-1-1, p 2ap; tibia v 2-2 -2; metatarsus v 2 bas. II, femur d 1-1-1, p d1ap; tibia v r1-r1-p1; metatarsus v 2 bas. III, femur d 1-1-1, p and r 0-d1-d1; patella r d1; tibia v p1-p1-2, p 1- d1-1-0, r d1-1, d r1bas; metatarsus v 2 -0-p1 plus apical comb, p and r d1-1-1, d 0-p1- 2. IV, femur d 1-1-1, p and r d1ap; patella r d1; tibia v p1-2-2, p and r 1-d1-1-0, d r1bas; metatarsus v 2-2 -p1 plus apical comb, p and r d1-1-1, d 0-p1-2. Color in ethanol ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ): Prosoma brown, legs brown, darker distally. Opisthosoma pale brown, dorsal pattern brown, including posterior chevrons. Opisthosoma length 2.55, epigastrium–spiracle 1.19, spiracle–spinnerets 0.15. Epigyne: Lateral lobes separate, median field not sclerotized ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 g). Copulatory openings very close to epigastric furrow. Copulatory ducts slightly wrapped. Ducts of accessory bulbs short. Spermathecae with convoluted chambers ( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 h, 24a–c).

Variability: Spines in male: I, tibia v 0-p1-p 1. II, tibia v 0-2-p 1. III, metatarsus v 2 -r1-2 or 2-2-2.

Distribution: Known from Neuquén and Río Negro provinces in Argentina.

Other material examined: ARGENTINA: same locality as holotype, 1 male (MACN-Ar 2227; temporary preparation MJR-01343); same data as paratype [1 immature] (MACN-Ar).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 5. Coptoprepes ecotono new species. a – d male holotype (a dorsal habitus; b prosoma, dorsal view; c ventral habitus, ventral view; d prosoma, ventral view).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 6. Coptoprepes ecotono new species. a – d female paratype (a dorsal habitus; b prosoma, dorsal view; c ventral habitus, ventral view; d prosoma, ventral view).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 7. Coptoprepes ecotono new species. a – f male, g – h female paratype (a left palp, male holotype, prolateral view, b same, ventral view, c same, retrolateral view; d copulatory bulb, preparation MJR- 01343, prolateral view, e same, apical view, f same, retrolateral view; g epigyne, ventral view; h vulva).

Gallery Image

FIGURE 22. Prosoma, anterior view: a Coptoprepes ecotono, female paratype; b C. bellavista, female paratype; c C. casablanca, female paratype; d C. contulmo, male holotype; e C. eden, female paratype; f C. recinto, female paratype.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 23. Male copulatory bulbs, schematic. a – c C. ecotono (a preparation MJR- 01343, prolateral view, b same, apical view, c same, retrolateral view); d – f C. bellavista (d preparation MJR- 01329, prolateral view, e same, apical view, f same, retrolateral view); g – i C. casablanca (g preparation MJR- 01331, prolateral view, h same, apical view, i same, retrolateral view); j – l C. contulmo (j preparation MJR- 01334, prolateral view, k same, apical view, l same, retrolateral view). m – o C. recinto (m preparation MJR- 01332, prolateral view, n same, apical view, o same, retrolateral view). Abbreviations: (C 2) secondary conductor, (E) embolus, (EBP) embolus basal process, (MA) median apophysis, (PMA) paramedian apophysis, (SDAL) apical loop of sperm duct, (T) tegulum.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 24. Female vulvae. a – c C. ecotono (a female paratype, dorsal view, b same, ventral view, c trajectory in ventral view, schematic); d – f C. bellavista (d female paratype, dorsal view, e same, ventral view, f trajectory in ventral view, schematic); g – i C. casablanca (g female paratype, dorsal view, h same, ventral view, i trajectory in ventral view, schematic); j – l C. eden (j female paratype, dorsal view, k same, ventral view, l trajectory in ventral view, schematic); m – o C. recinto (m female paratype, dorsal view, n same, ventral view, o trajectory in ventral view, schematic). Abbreviations: (AB) accessory bulb, (CD) copulatory duct, (CO) copulatory opening, (FD) fertilization duct, (LL) lateral lobe, (MF) median field, (S) spermathecae.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Anyphaenidae

Genus

Coptoprepes