Crocidura elongata Miller and Hollister, 1921
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090.454.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7982B923-4CDC-44ED-A598-8651009DC7CC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5795503 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB318-010E-E92E-4D8D-FC05FDC0B15A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-12-17 13:23:18, last updated 2023-11-08 19:46:29) |
scientific name |
Crocidura elongata Miller and Hollister, 1921 |
status |
|
Crocidura elongata Miller and Hollister, 1921 View in CoL
Crocidura elongata Miller and Hollister, 1921 View in CoL : 101. Original description.
.
Crocidura View in CoL “dark elongata” Esselstyn et al., 2019: 1715. Informal name.
HOLOTYPE: USNM 217534 , an adult male obtained by H.C. Raven on 1 August 1916. The specimen comprises a skin and skull. External measurements recorded from the type are 214 mm × 120 mm × 22 mm; no ear length or weight was recorded. TYPE LOCALITY: “Temboan (southwest from Tondano Lake), northeastern Celebes” (Miller and Hollister, 1921: 101; fig. 1 View FIG ). We estimate that the type locality is at 0.979° N, 124.605° E, 650 m elevation, which differs from other interpretations (e.g., Musser, 2014). See the gazetteer for a full explanation (appendix). GoogleMaps
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION: Apparently restricted to the northern peninsula of Sulawesi, where clear records are known from the northeast (the type locality, Temboan and Mt. Ambang, North Sulawesi Province) and north-west (Mt. Dako, Central Sulawesi Province, and Mt. Buliohuto, Gorontalo Province) areas of endemism ( fig. 16 View FIG ). The absence of records from the north-central area of endemism are almost certainly due to the general lack of mammal collecting from this region. Miller and Hollister’s (1921) paratypes from “Pinedapa, eastern Middle Celebes ” and the two specimens from Mt. Rorekatimbo reported by Ruedi (1995) almost certainly represent Crocidura microelongata (see below). Crocidura elongata is known from a moderately broad range of elevations, with the low elevation records between 500 and 600 m from Mts. Buliohuto and Dako and high-elevation records reaching 1600 m on Mt. Dako ( table 3 View TABLE 3 ). The type locality at Temboan is around 650 m elevation.
Long-Tailed Ordinary Rhoditis Small-Bodied Thick ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ● 54 43 34 ● 40 17 78 27 15 43 5 27 75 20 7 21 20 26 27 6 5 11 = = = = = = = = = N = = = = N = = = = = N = N = = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● = 54 = 44 = 33 = 40 = 17 = 81 = 27 = 15 = 43 = 5 = 27 = 75 = 22 = 7 = 21 = 20 = 26 = 27 = 6 = 5 = 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● = 54 = 43 = 32 = 40 = 18 = 78 = 27 = 15 = 43 = 5 = 27 = 76 = 20 = 7 = 21 = 20 = 26 = 27 = 6 = 5 = 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● 54 44 34 40 17 81 27 15 ● 43 5 27 75 22 7 21 20 26 27 6 5 11 = = = = = = = = = N = = = = N = = = = = N = N = = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
EMENDED DIAGNOSIS: A long-bodied, somewhat heavily built, moderately bicolored shrew with a very long tail and unusually long, pale hind feet ( figs. 9 View FIG , 14C View FIG , 17 View FIG ; tables 2 View TABLE 2 , 5 View TABLE 5 ). The dorsal pelage is gray-brown overall; individual dorsal hairs are gray at the base and brown at the tip. The ventral pelage is paler, with individual hairs gray-based like those on the dorsum, except that the hair tips are silvery. The silvery appearance of the venter is most pronounced on the throat and chest area. In some specimens, however, this area has a reddish tint, due to variation in the color of the tips of some hairs. The mystacial vibrissae are dark proximally but white distally. The ears are prominent and pale. Dorsally, the feet are pale, transitioning from light brown near the wrist and ankle to nearly white on the digits. Ventrally, the feet show the same transition, but pigment is concentrated around the base of the pads ( fig. 14C View FIG ). The claws are translucent. The hind feet are long, even relative to head-and-body length ( fig. 17 View FIG ). The long tail is subtly bicolored, with a brown dorsum and pale brown venter. Tiny applied hairs are present along the entire length of the tail, but they are barely visible to the naked eye ( fig. 14C View FIG ). However, these hairs are slightly longer and white near the tip of the tail, creating a very small white distal tuft. The long bristle hairs that are common at the base of the tail of many Crocidura are nearly absent in this species. The skull is long and slender, with a notably narrow braincase, interorbital region, and palate ( figs. 10 View FIG , 18A View FIG ). Although the interorbital region is narrow relative to skull length, it is less constricted than the braincase. The long skull of C. elongata is attributable primarily to elongation of the postpalatal region; the rostral length is short relative to skull length ( fig. 10 View FIG ). The lambdoidal ridge is prominent for a shrew of this size. The interorbital region is relatively straight (i.e., not strongly tapered) when viewed from the dorsal aspect. The dentition is prominent relative to the palatal breadth ( fig. 18A View FIG ).
NMKR
BobAaTe NM
=
BoAfkCApb VKR V
COMPARISONS: Crocidura elongata is readily distinguished from most shrew species on Sulawesi by its long body and even longer tail, relatively pale color, and long and narrow hind feet and skull ( tables 2 View TABLE 2 , 5 View TABLE 5 ). Its head-and-body length is considerably longer than all species except C. rhoditis and C. quasielongata . Absolute hind-foot and ear lengths are on average greater in C. elongata than in any other shrew on Sulawesi ( fig. 9 View FIG ; table 2 View TABLE 2 ). However, the other members of the Elongata Subgroup, first described below, can be difficult to distinguish ( fig. 11 View FIG ; table 4 View TABLE 4 ). Compared to C. elongata , C. microelongata is smaller bodied, with a darker pelage and shorter average tail length. The thenar pad on the hind foot of C. elongata ( fig. 14C View FIG ) is considerably longer than in either C. microelongata ( fig. 14D View FIG ) or C. quasielongata ( fig. 14B View FIG ). The skull of C. microelongata is also shorter but
jO
=
AT T
=
tfaTe SKR
=
Coltk S
elongata C. microelongataC. quasielongata C. pmbCfbp
nearly as wide at the braincase and interorbital region, hence its relative width (BB/CIL and IOW/CIL) is greater than that of C. elongata ( figs. 10 View FIG , 12 View FIG ). Compared to C. elongata , C. quasielongata has a similar head-and-body length, but, on average, a shorter tail and paler pelage ( fig. 12 View FIG , table 2 View TABLE 2 ). The skull of C. elongata is very similar in length to that of C. quasielongata ( figs. 12 View FIG , 18 View FIG ). However, in C. elongata the rostrum makes up a smaller proportion and the postpalatal region makes up a greater proportion of skull length than in C. quasielongata ( figs. 10 View FIG , 12 View FIG ). In addition, relative braincase breadth (BB/ CIL and BB/IOW) is, on average, slightly less in C. elongata than in C. quasielongata . A principal components analysis of 12 cranial measurements shows that these two species have broad, though not complete, overlap in multivariate morphometric space ( fig. 11 View FIG ).
COMMENTS: A nearly complete cytochrome b sequence (1109 bp) from a topotypical paratype (USNM 217535) is nearly identical to those from specimens we collected on Mt. Ambang ( fig. 4 View FIG ), which is approximately 32 km to the southwest. Our inference based on mitogenomes also place USNM 217535 as a close relative to specimens from Mt. Ambang ( fig. 5 View FIG ). These animals’ mitochondrial sequences are also closely related to a series from Mt. Buliohuto and to specimens from Mt. Dako referred to as “dark elongata” by Esselstyn et al. (2019). Maximum Jukes-Cantor distances between these sample localities is 0.05 ( fig. 4 View FIG ; supplementary data S5). Samples of this species from Temboan and Mts. Ambang, Buliohuto, and Dako formed a well-supported clade in our analyses of UCEs ( figs. 7 View FIG , 8 View FIG ) and concatenated nuclear exons (supplementary data S6).
The phylogeographic study of Eldridge et al. (2018), which examined the correspondence of genetic diversity in Elongata Subgroup shrews to the area of endemism paradigm expectations, conflated the three species of this subgroup with Crocidura elongata . More recently, specimens of C. elongata from Mt. Dako were referred to as “dark elongata” by Esselstyn et al. (2019) because the authors were unable to determine if either of two long-tailed species on Mt. Dako represented true C. elongata . Mt. Dako is the only area where we found C. elongata occurring in syntopy with another member of the Elongata Subgroup ( C. quasielongata ). Despite the confusing history of specimens in this subgroup, none of our analyses suggested a sister relationship between any two of these species. In our UCE species-tree inference, C. elongata was moderately supported as the sister to C. rhoditis and C. pseudorhoditis ( fig. 7 View FIG ), but in our mitogenome estimate it was placed as sister to C. lea , although without statistical support ( fig. 5 View FIG ).
Ruedi (1995) suggested a scansorial lifestyle for this species based on its long, naked-appearing tail and long hind feet. While this is certainly possible, direct evidence for a scansorial lifestyle is lacking, and these traits could be linked alternatively to a saltatorial locomotory style ( Brosset, 1988). Some very limited evidence indicates that Crocidura caudipilosa , which has a long, but less extreme tail combined with a more typical hind-foot length, is a skilled climber ( Esselstyn et al., 2019).
For coalescent species delimitation results, see the Crocidura quasielongata account below.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Mt. Ambang ( LSUMZ 39008–39013 , 39015–39018 , 39057 , 39058 , 39061 , 39248–39251 , 39257–39264 , 39318 ; NMV C38009 , C38032 ) , Mt. Buliohuto ( LSUMZ 38238 , 38240 , 38243–38247 , 38251–38253 ; NMV C37742 , C37752 , C37760 ), Mt. Dako ( LSUMZ 36905–36907 , 36909 , 36916 , 36919 , 36921 , 36923 , 36924 , 36932 ; NMV C37248 , C37249 , C37303 ), Temboan ( USNM 217534 , 217535 ).
Brosset, A. 1988. Le peuplement de mammiferes insectivores des forets du nord-est du Gabon. Revue d'Ecologie, La Terre et la Vie 43: 23 - 46.
Eldridge, R. A., A. S. Achmadi, T. C. Giarla, K. C. Rowe, and J. A. Esselstyn. 2018. Geographic isolation and elevational gradients promote diversification in an endemic shrew on Sulawesi. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 118: 306 - 317.
Esselstyn, J. A., A. S. Achmadi, H. Handika, T. C. Giarla, and K. C. Rowe. 2019. A new climbing shrew from Sulawesi highlights the tangled taxonomy of an endemic radiation. Journal of Mammalogy 100: 1713 - 1725.
Musser, G. G. 2014. A systematic review of Sulawesi Bunomys (Muridae, Murinae) with the description of two new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 392: 1 - 313.
Ruedi, M. 1995. Taxonomic revision of shrews of the genus Crocidura from the Sunda Shelf and Sulawesi with description of two new species (Mammalia: Soricidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 115: 211 - 265.
FIG. 1. Maps of A, Southeast Asia and B, Sulawesi showing topographical relief and the approximate boundaries (thick black lines) between areas of endemism (sensu Evans et al., 2003). Two-letter abbreviations in dark gray typeface identify the north-east (NE), north-central (NC), north-west (NW), west-central (WC), eastcentral (EC), south-west (SW), and south-east (SE) areas of endemism. Diamonds label localities where we, or others, have collected shrew specimens since 2010 with the mountain (or locality) name. Stars indicate type localities (Temboan and Pinedapa) from Miller and Hollister (1921). The type localities for the only two Crocidura described from the island since 1921 are Mt. Rorekatimbo (west-central area of endemism) for C. musseri Ruedi (1995) and Mt. Dako (north-west area of endemism) for C. caudipilosa Esselstyn et al. (2019).
FIG. 16. Map of Sulawesi showing localities sampled for shrews. Colored areas enclose localities with known records of members of the Elongata Subgroup. Although we excluded Pinedapa from the estimated geographic ranges, we suspect the two USNM specimens referred to Crocidura elongata by Miller and Hollister (1921) from this site represent C. microelongata.
FIG. 9. Box plots showing variation in external measurements from all species of Sulawesi shrew. Plots show the median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, the maximum value within 1.5 × interquartile range (distance between 1st and 3rd quartiles; IQR), the minimum value within 1.5 × IQR, and outliers (black circles). Sample sizes are shown along the x-axis. Species are grouped according to the species groups used in the text (Thick = Thick- Tailed Group). All measurements in mm. HBL = head-and-body length.
FIG. 14. Images showing the ventral surface of the left hind foot and dorsal surfaces of the tail base (approximately 1 cm from rump) and tail tip from the four members of the Long-Tailed Group: A, Crocidura caudipilosa, LSUMZ 36940; B, C. quasielongata, FMNH 218551; C, C. elongata, LSUMZ 39009; and D, C. microelongata, FMNH 212998. Scale bars represent 5 mm and apply to their nearest images within each panel. The thenar (T) and hypothenar (H) pads are labeled on panel B.
FIG. 17. Box plots showing the length of the hind foot (HF) relative to the head-and-body length (HBL) and the ratio of mass to HBL. Plots show the median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, the maximum value within 1.5 × interquartile range (distance between 1st and 3rd quartiles; IQR), the minimum value within 1.5 × IQR, and outliers (black circles). Sample sizes are shown along the x-axis. Species are ordered along the x-axis according to the species groups used in the text (Thick = Thick-Tailed Group). Lengths are in mm and mass is in grams.
FIG. 10. Box plots of relative skull measures showing braincase breadth (BB), interorbital width (IOW), and rostral length (RL) divided by condyloincisive length (CIL) and BB divided by IOW for all species of Sulawesi shrew. Plots show the median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, the maximum value within 1.5 × interquartile range (distance between 1st and 3rd quartiles; IQR), the minimum value within 1.5 × IQR, and outliers (black circles). Sample sizes are shown along the x-axis. Species are ordered according to the species groups used in the text (Thick = Thick-Tailed Group).
FIG. 18. Images showing dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull and lateral and occlusal views of the dentary of the three members of the Elongata Subgroup: A, Crocidura elongata, LSUMZ 39259; B, C. microelongata, FMNH 213426; and C, C. quasielongata, LSUMZ 36939.
FIG. 11. Bivariate plot of the first two principal components from an analysis of 12 cranial measurements from the Elongata Subgroup. Loadings and variance explained are given in table 4.
FIG.12. Box plots of skull measurements useful for distinguishing species of the Elongata Subgroup. Plots show the median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, the maximum value within 1.5 × interquartile range (distance between 1st and 3rd quartiles; IQR), the minimum value within 1.5 × IQR, and outliers (black circles). Sample sizes are shown along the x-axis. All measurements in mm.
FIG. 4. Maximum-likelihood estimate of the gene tree of Sulawesi Crocidura derived from an alignment of 851 individuals and 1111 characters from the mitochondrial gene cytochrome b. Bootstrap support is shown along branches. Clades corresponding to species are collapsed for ease of presentation. Tips are labeled with the species name, the number of tips (T), and number of localities (L), as labeled in figure 1, and the maximum intraspecific (MI) Jukes-Cantor distance calculated from a reduced alignment. Two species are paraphyletic and their respective, within-clade MI values are shown separately. For species described by Miller and Hollister (1921), the holotype or paratypes are included for C. elongata, C. lea, and C. rhoditis. Branch lengths between C. nigripes and other taxa are shortened for presentation. See supplementary data S2 for the full tree.
FIG. 5. Maximum likelihood estimate of the mitochondrial gene tree derived from an analysis of 14,007 characters (representing protein-coding and rRNA genes) from 83 samples. Bootstrap support values <95 are shown at nodes. Tips are labeled with the species, locality, and voucher number.
FIG. 7. Estimated species tree from analysis of 3940 ultraconserved element loci in ASTRAL. Samples from Sulawesi are labeled with the species name, locality, and catalog number. Asterisks indicate type specimens from Miller and Hollister (1921). Local posterior probabilities <0.95 are shown. Tip branch lengths are arbitrary.
FIG. 8. Estimated phylogenetic relationships from a maximum likelihood analysis of 983 concatenated ultraconserved elements. Samples from Sulawesi are labeled with the species name, locality, and catalog number. Asterisks indicate type specimens from Miller and Hollister (1921). Ultrafast bootstrap values <95 are shown.
TABLE 3 Elevational Ranges (m) and Species Richness of Crocidura on Mountains of Sulawesia
North Peninsula | West-Central | SW | East-Central | SE | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amb | Bulio | Dako | Gand | Lati | Bal | Rore | Torom | Bawa | Kato | Tomp | Mek | |
Long-tailed group: | ||||||||||||
caudipilosa | 1460– 1655 | 480– 1390 | 512– 1630 | 1535– 2640 | 1697– 2500 | — | 2020– 2250 | 793– 862 | 1660– 2550 | 1352– 1610 | — | 1710– 2536 |
elongata | 1460– 1592 | 580– 1390 | 512– 1630 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
microelongata | — | — | — | 1535– 2640 | 683– 2535 | — | 2020– 2250 | 1584– 2218 | — | — | — | — |
quasielongata | — | — | 410 | 170 | 683 | 830– 1140 | — | 663– 1727 | 1660– 2040 | 365– 1700 | 350 | 1366– 1717 |
Ordinary group: | ||||||||||||
musseri | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020– 2250 | — | — | — | — | — |
nigripes | 1460– 1481 | 480– 1390 | 410– 1630 | 170 | — | 900– 1140 | 2020 | 790– 1371 | — | 414– 875 | — | — |
normalis | — | — | — | 1535– 2640 | 1770– 2500 | — | 2020– 2250 | — | — | 1380– 1610 | — | 1366 |
ordinaria | — | — | — | 170– 2640 | — | — | — | 724– 790 | — | — | — | — |
solita | — | — | — | 1535– 2640 | 683– 2518 | — | 2020– 2250 | — | — | — | — | — |
Rhoditis group: | ||||||||||||
australis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1660– 2550 | — | — | — |
pallida | — | — | — | 1535– 1620 | 1376 | 860– 1244 | — | 1584– 1727 | — | 450– 1610 | 350– 600 | 120– 2578 |
pseudorhoditis | 1460– 1655 | 480– 1210 | 512– 1630 | — | — | — | 2230 | 1584– 1727 | — | — | — | — |
rhoditis | 1460– 1655 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Small-bodied group: | ||||||||||||
mediocris | — | — | — | 170 | 1697 | 817– 1107 | — | 663– 859 | — | — | — | 1471– 1936 |
balete | — | 1375– 1390 | 1560– 1630 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
lea | — | 400– 1210 | 512– 1600 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
levicula | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1371– 1890 | — | 1365– 1700 | 350– 600 | — |
parva | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1660– 2550 | — | — | — |
TABLE 2 Descriptive Statisticsa for External Measurements (mm) and Mass (g) for Species of Sulawesi Crocidura
Total | Tail | Hind foot | Ear | Mass | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. australis | 142 ± 4.3 (136–148) 5 | 63 ± 3.3 (59–67) 5 | 16 ± 0.4 (16–17) 5 | 11 ± 0.5 (10–11) 5 | 10.9 ± 1.83 (8.5–12.7) 5 |
C. baletei | 112 ± 5.24 (102–121) 17 | 47 ± 3.1 (42–53) 17 | 12 ± 0.6 (10–12) 17 | 8 ± 0.6 (7–9) 17 | 5.3 ± 0.58 (4.3–6.4) 17 |
C. brevicauda | 141 ± 6.1 (130–150) 8 | 58 ± 3.1 (54–64) 8 | 16 ± 0.8 (15–17) 8 | 9 ± 0.7 (8–10) 8 | 12.4 ± 1.63 (10.6–15.2) 8 |
C. caudicrassa | 141 ± 5.5 (130–150) 15 | 59 ± 4.3 (50–64) 15 | 16 ± 0.5 (16–17) 16 | 10 ± 0.5 (9–10) 16 | 15.5 ± 1.34 (13.5–18.5) 16 |
C. caudipilosa | 164 ± 7.7 (145–183) 75 | 86 ± 4.6 (79–98) 74 | 17 ± 0.9 (15–19) 76 | 10 ± 1.0 (8–13) 77 | 8.8 ± 1.27 (5.8–12) 75 |
C. elongata | 213 ± 8.6 (192–229) 54 | 118 ± 6.9 (102–137) 57 | 22 ± 0.9 (21–24) 57 | 13 ± 1.2 (10–15) 53 | 14.5 ± 1.57 (9.5–17.7) 55 |
C. lea | 115 ± 51 (100–124) 37 | 50 ± 2.5 (44–55) 37 | 12 ± 0.8 (10–14) 38 | 8 ± 0.7 (7–9) 37 | 5.0 ± 0.73 (3.4–6.6) 34 |
C. levicula | 99 ± 5.3 (85–109) 51 | 36 ± 2.9 (27–44) 51 | 11 ± 0.5 (10–12) 51 | 8 ± 0.8 (6–10) 49 | 4.4 ± 0.77 (3–7) 49 |
C. mediocris | 106 ± 5.0 (89–117) 93 | 44 ± 2.9 (37–50) 93 | 11 ± 0.6 (10–13) 97 | 8 ± 0.7 (6–9) 97 | 4.4 ± 0.72 (2.9–5.9) 97 |
C. microelongata | 188 ± 9.7 (165–209) 98 | 106 ± 6.4 (94–121) 93 | 19 ± 0.9 (17–21) 98 | 10 ± 0.8 (8–13) 96 | 11.1 ± 1.59 (7.5–14.25) 93 |
C. musseri | 131 ± 6.8 (112–144) 27 | 57 ± 3.6 (51–67) 28 | 15 ± 0.7 (14–17) 30 | 9 ± 0.7 (8–11) 30 | 9.1 ± 1.27 (6.2–12.0) 27 |
C. nigripes | 140 ± 9.2 (106–156) 95 | 57 ± 5.7 (42–71) 97 | 15 ± 1.1 (13–18) 97 | 10 ± 1.4 (7–15) 79 | 11.2 ± 1.86 (7.9–16.0) 74 |
C. normalis | 122 ± 5.1 (110–140) 58 | 54 ± 4.6 (46–65) 58 | 14 ± 0.8 (12–16) 56 | 8 ± 0.7 (7–10) 58 | 6.1 ± 0.86 (4.3–8.2) 58 |
C. ordinaria | 137 ± 7.8 (122–163) 44 | 63 ± 4.8 (52–76) 44 | 15 ± 0.6 (14–17) 44 | 9 ± 0.6 (8–10) 44 | 9.7 ± 1.35 (5–12.8) 43 |
C. pallida | 140 ± 7.7 (122–160) 74 | 62 ± 4.7 (49–73) 74 | 16 ± 0.7 (14–17) 82 | 10 ± 1.0 (7.5–13) 77 | 10.4 ± 1.50 (7.4–16) 75 |
C. parva | 104 ± 5.36 (88–112) 33 | 41 ± 3.0 (29–47) 34 | 11 ± 0.5 (10–12) 34 | 8.0 ± 0.46 (7–9) 34 | 4.3 ± 0.62 (3.2–5.9) 34 |
C. pseudorhoditis | 158 ± 8.7 (135–180) 98 | 73 ± 6.0 (59–84) 93 | 17 ± 0.8 (15–19) 96 | 10.7 ± 1.1 (8–13) 97 | 13.2 ± 1.72 (10.3–18.5) 93 |
C. quasielongata | 205 ± 13.9 (171–240) 112 | 114 ± 10.5 (86–144) 115 | 21 ± 1.2 (18–24) 115 | 12 ± 1.2 (9–14) 112 | 13.6 ± 2.20 (8.6–19.5) 110 |
C. rhoditis | 158 ± 11.0 (131–182) 26 | 70 ± 5.2 (57–77) 26 | 18 ± 1.1 (16–20) 26 | 11 ± 1.1 (10–13) 18 | 16.9 ± 2.64 (11.5–21.9) 18 |
C. solita | 135 ± 7.1 (118–154) 152 | 62 ± 4.1 (50–75) 152 | 15 ± 0.8 (14–19) 154 | 9 ± 0.9 (7–11) 155 | 8.5 ± 1.34 (5.4–12.5) 154 |
C. tenebrosa | 104 ± 4.2 (96–111) 14 | 41 ± 2.4 (36–44) 14 | 12 ± 0.7 (11–13) 13 | 10 ± 1.0 (8–11) 14 | 5.6 ± 0.67 (4.3–6.6) 14 |
a The sample mean ± one standard deviation, the observed range in parentheses, and the sample size.
TABLE 4 Results of Principal Components Analysis of Craniodental Measurements of the Elongata Subgroup of Crocidura
Component 1 | Component 2 | |
---|---|---|
Variablesa | ||
Condyloincisive length | 0.7310 | 0.0787 |
Braincase breadth | 0.0950 | 0.3000 |
Interorbital width | 0.0345 | 0.2089 |
Rostral length | 0.3256 | -0.5244 |
Postpalatal width | 0.0533 | 0.0238 |
Rostral width | 0.0654 | -0.0098 |
Postpalatal length | 0.3520 | 0.3492 |
Condyle to glenoid fossa | 0.2238 | 0.5233 |
Upper toothrow length | 0.3401 | -0.3828 |
P4 to M3 length | 0.1675 | -0.1932 |
M2 to M2 labial width | 0.1531 | -0.0187 |
Palatal width | 0.0336 | 0.0667 |
Proportion of variance | 0.9089 | 0.0261 |
Cumulative variance | 0.9089 | 0.9350 |
a Table entries for variables are component loadings.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Crocidura elongata Miller and Hollister, 1921
Esselstyn, Jacob A., Achmadi, Anang S., Handika, Heru, Swanson, Mark T., Giarla, Thomas C. & Rowe, Kevin C. 2021 |
Crocidura elongata
Miller and Hollister 1921 |
1 (by felipe, 2021-12-17 13:23:18)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-12-17 16:31:09)
3 (by valdenar, 2021-12-20 13:41:51)
4 (by valdenar, 2021-12-20 14:07:27)
5 (by valdenar, 2021-12-20 14:26:48)
6 (by valdenar, 2021-12-21 11:48:44)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-12-21 11:53:58)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-12-21 11:58:59)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-12-21 12:31:59)