Halicyclops ramirezi, Menu-Marque, Silvina & Sorarrain, Dora, 2007
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.178839 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5688404 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E6C3A-5913-FFC0-F6CF-41C4D0A4FC1E |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Halicyclops ramirezi |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Halicyclops ramirezi sp. nov.
( Figs 2–28 View FIGURES 2 – 11 View FIGURES 22 – 28 )
Material examined. 3 females and 3 males from Laguna Mar Chiquita (37°40´S, 57°19´W) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Female holotype (MACN-In 36391), male allotype (MACN-In 36392) and four dissected paratypes (MACN-In 36393), two females and two males.
Description. Female. holotype total length, excluding caudal setae, 0.7 mm. Prosome: urosome ratio of holotype: 1.5. Postero-dorsal border of all prosomites smooth ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ). Genital double-somite ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) as long as wide, with 2 large triangular protrusions located laterally in the anterior third, similar to those of H. pilosus Rocha, 1984 and small lateral integumentary windows on the posterior third. Such structures are present also in H. venezuelaensis Lindberg, 1954 (as illustrated by Rocha 1995a), but here are slightly triangular. Seminal receptacle not visible ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ). Copulatory pore located centrally at the proximal third of the somite. Posterior edges of urosomites with denticulate hyaline membrane, larger in genital double-somite and decreasing in size in 2 subsequent urosomites, with denticles far more conspicuous on ventral than on dorsal surface ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ). Anal pseudoperculum unarmed and with rounded margin. Anal somite deeply incised, with distal edge smooth dorsally and denticulate ventrally. Anal area with semicircular row of long spinules on each side.
Caudal rami as long as wide ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ). Lateral seta inserted on a raised base located at end of slightly broader proximal third of caudal ramus, somewhat longer than or equal to the width of ramus itself. Dorsal seta with articulated base, inserted on distally-located papilla and longer than lateral seta. Outer apical seta longer and stiffer than inner apical seta. Inner median seta representing about 60% of total body length, 2.3– 2.5 longer than outer median seta, with basal portion ornamented with sparse short setules and terminal portion with longer, more numerous setules on both sides, becoming gradually thinner towards apex. Outer median seta ( Figs 5–6 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) also setulose, but setules shorter and not so densely packed.
Antennule ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) 6-segmented, with the same structure and armature as other species of genus, e.g. H. venezuelaensis (as redescribed by Rocha 1995a), H. hurlberti Rocha, 1991 and H. tetracanthus Rocha, 1995: 8 , 12, 5 + spine, 6 + aesthetasc, 2, 10 + aesthetasc ( Rocha 1995a). Fourth segment about 1.8 longer than wide, its anterior margin notched at insertion of each marginal seta.
Antenna ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) 3-segmented. Reduced coxa unarmed, fused to basis; basis with 2 plumose setae at inner distal corner; exopod represented by hyaline, sparsely plumose seta, reaching base of terminal segment. Endopod 2-segmented; first segment bearing a single submarginal seta in distal third. Last segment bearing 5 setae along inner margin distributed 1-2-2 on 3 notches, and 7 setae of diverse lengths at tip; outer margin with transverse rows of spinules forming 3 archs.
Mandible ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) consisting of gnathobase provided with sharp toothed pars incisiva and reduced palp with 2 naked setae, the longest barely reaching base of teeth.
FIGURES 12–21. Halicyclops ramirezi sp. nov. female. 12: maxilliped; 13: maxilliped; 14: P1; 15: P2; 16: P3; 17: P4; 18: terminal endopodal segment of P4, whole specimen; 19: terminal endopodal segment of P4, permanent slide; 20: P5; 21: P5 and P6. Figs 13–15, 18, 20, from paratype 1; 12, 16–17, 19, 21 from paratype 2. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Maxillule ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) comprising strong praecoxa and 2-segmented palp. Distal end of praecoxa bearing 4 strong, curved, claw-like spines, 3 fused to segment and the largest articulated and bearing a stiff setule; inner surface bearing 7 conical spines of different lengths. Palp showing 4 spiny setae on proximal segment and 3 setae on distal one.
Maxilla ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 2 – 11 ) consisting of 4 segments. Praecoxa fused to coxa and bearing 2 setae ornamented with stiff setules. Naked seta present on raised swelling on coxa; single coxal endite bearing naked seta and a strong distal seta, ornamented with 3 long, stiff setules. Basis produced into strong serrate claw, ornamented with strong serrated spine and thin seta. Unsegmented endopod carrying 2 spines, thin seta and 2 short hairlike setae.
Maxilliped (Figs 12–13) 2-segmented. Basal segment armed with 2 long spiny setae, 2 spinules on opposite edge and a row of spinules distally. Apical segment armed with 5 setae, 2 of which are ornamented with conspicuous stiff setules.
Swimming legs 1–4 (Figs 14–21) armature as in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
P1 (Fig. 14) basis with spine at inner corner reaching third endopodal segment and armed with very long, needle-like, stiff setules, arising in a helicoidal pattern.
P4 third endopodal segment (Figs 17–19) 1.4 longer than wide; inner apical spine 1.5 times longer than segment and on average 1.3 longer than outer apical spine: inner rim with 2 stiff, spine-like setae. Distal inner seta shorter than segment, not reaching tip of inner apical spine, almost even with external spine.
P5 (Fig. 20–21) exopod about 1.5 times longer than broad, bearing 3 spines and 1 seta. Seta slightly longer than inner spine, which is longest of the 3, almost as long as segment. Minute spinules present on external and internal margins. P6 located on dorsal side of lateral protrusions, represented by inner seta and 2 blunt protrusions (Fig. 21).
Male ( Figs 22–28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ). Allotype ( Figs 22–23 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) total length, excluding caudal setae, 0.53 mm. Only dimorphic traits described and illustrated. Prosome: urosome ratio of allotype about 1.7. Genital somite slightly wider than long (L/W= 0.85). Following urosomite with somewhat triangular integumentary windows in the posterior half. Inner median seta proportionally longer than in female, representing about 65% of total body length
Antennule ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) 14-segmented; it ends in a spatulate tip when seen in dorsal view, and presenting a complicated set of serrate spines on inner edge of joint between 12th and 13th segments ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ).
Distal segment of P4 endopod ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) slightly more slender than in female, 1.5 times longer than wide; inner finely-serrate spine-like setae much longer than in female, both surpassing by far tip of external seta. Distal inner seta longer than segment.
P5 ( Figs 27–28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) with same armature distribution as female; tiny spinules on external margin longer and more visible. Spines much longer than in female, longest around 1.4 times longer than segment.
P6 ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) spine reaching almost to distal edge of the segment, with a row of minute spines at base; setae finely plumose, internal longer than middle one.
Etymology. The species is dedicated to Dr. Fernando César Ramírez, zooplanktologist at INIDEP (and previously at the Instituto de Biología Marina) at Mar del Plata, mentor to generations of Argentinean planktologists.
Habitat. H. ramirezi sp. nov. is known only from plankton samples taken at the type locality, where it is completely outnumbered by the benthic congener H. glaber . The few collected specimens appeared in samples considered to be close to freshwater, on account of their low conductivity. More detailed sampling is needed to detect microhabitat preferences of the new species in a complex environment with fluctuating salinity levels.
Differential diagnosis. Halicyclops ramirezi sp. nov. belongs to the group of species recognized by Rocha (1991) as sharing the following traits:
- caudal setae bearing only setules as ornaments and these heteronomously distributed,- fourth segment of female antennule less than twice as long as wide,- inner spine of the second basipodite of P1 reaching at least midlength of the third endopod of that swimming leg.
- In addition it shares with many species of this group the spine formula 3-4-4-3 for the last exopodal segment of P2–P4.
The new species most closely resembles H. glaber and H. venezuelaensis . The female can be readily distinguished from the former by the presence of two slender, finely serrate spines, on the inner margin of the third endopodal segment of P4, and from the latter by the shape of the genital double-somite, by the proportional lengths of the setae on the last endopodal segment of P4 and on the exopod of the P5. The male is easily distinguished from those of both species by the P5 armature, which consists in H. ramirezi of four elements (three spines and one seta) rather than five elements (three spines and two setae).The presence of small lateral integumentary windows in the last third of the genital double-somite of the female and the second urosomite of the male is a trait shared with H. venezuelaensis , from which the new species differs by the slightly triangular shape of these structures.
TABLE 1. Number of spines (Roman numerals), setae (Arabic numerals) and spine-like setae (underlined Arabic numerals) per segment of the swimming legs 1 to 4 of Halicyclops ramirezi sp. nov.
| C o x a | B a s i s | E x o p o d | E ndopod | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 2 3 | 1 2 3 | |||
| P 1 | 0- 1 | 1 -I | I- 1; I- 1; III, 2, 3 | 0 -1; 0- 1; I, I + 1, 3 |
| P 2 | 0- 1 | 1 -0 | I- 1; I- 1; III, I + 1, 4 | 0 -1; 0- 2; I, II, 3 |
| P3 | 0-1 | 1-0 | I-1; I-1; III, I+1, 4 | 0-1; 0-2; I, II, 3 |
| P4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | I-1; I-1; II, I+1, 4 | 0-1; 0-2; I, II, 2 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.