Foenatopus aurantiiceps Brues

Aguiar, Alexandre P., 2006, The Stephanidae (Hymenoptera) of Mexico, with description of six new species and key to western Foenatopus Smith, Zootaxa 1186, pp. 1-56 : 15-16

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.2646037

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FEE990DB-57FF-47EF-A518-F36CC70BD76F

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/103887A9-1A73-9F6A-FEB9-FEC9DE84FE15

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Foenatopus aurantiiceps Brues
status

 

Foenatopus aurantiiceps Brues

( Figs 19–22 View FIGURES 17–22 )

Foenatopus aurantiiceps Brues, 1915: 1 , ♀ holotype MCZC; DeSantis, 1980: 10; Aguiar, 2004b: 20; Aguiar, 2005c [synonymy];

Neostephanus fritzi Orfila, 1956: 6 , ♀ holotype MACN (examined); DeSantis, 1967: 51. Synonymized by Aguiar (2005c).

Foenatopus fritzi: Aguiar, 1998: 364 .

Morphological variation in females

Body length 15.0–31.0 mm. Fore wing vein 1Cu from complete and fully tubular to apical 0.15 spectral; vein 2­1A from a short stub to completely absent. Prosternum usually densely punctate/foveolate ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–22 ) but more sparse ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ) in specimens from localities north of the Amazon river; dilated portion of hind tibia with apical half, or sometimes fully, cream­yellowish, but fully black in specimens from high altitudes (label records from 860–1219 m). Specimens with prosternum more sparsely foveolate than the usual ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ) still have more foveolae per area unit than observed in F. annulipes ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–22 ).

MALE (first record). Body length 12.6 mm. Except for ordinary primary sexual differences, the single specimen examined is identical to the female on all features.

Comments

In spite of the wide latitudinal range of this species, its external morphology is considerably uniform. A redescription is not necessary at this time, as the species was reasonably well described by Brues (1915). Easily recognized as it represents the only western Foenatopus with reddish head, with a distinct centro­longitudinal impression ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17–22 ), and prosternum densely or at least moderately densely foveolate ( Figs 20, 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ).

Distribution

No records in Mexico. Originally known from northern Brazil (Amazonas, Manaus). The recent synonym with a species from Argentina ( Aguiar, 2005c) and the new distribution records below indicate that this species is well distributed throughout South America , probably overlapping with F. annulipes in the Amazon forest.

Material examined

Fourteen females, 1 male. ARGENTINA: Holotype ♀ MLPA “ARG. Jujuy, Yuto, 2.55, Foerster col.; Holotypus [red]; Neostephanus fritzi Holotype Orfila det./950. OSUC 141271 View Materials .” Right fore wing missing, otherwise complete, well preserved.

New records: BRAZIL: ♀ DZUP “Manaus­AM, Brasil , VIII.1959, C. Elias leg. OSUC 141272 View Materials .” ♀ DZUP “ Ouro Preto d’Oeste , RO. 29.X.1987. C. Elias leg, Projeto Polonoroeste. OSUC 141273 View Materials .” ♀ DZUP “ Ouro Preto d’Oeste , RO. 12.X.1987. C. Elias leg, Projeto Polonoroeste. OSUC21388 View Materials .” ♀ DZUP “ Ouro Preto d’Oeste , RO. 2.XI.1987. C. Elias leg, Projeto Polonoroeste. OSUC 141274 View Materials .” ♀ EMUS “ Brazil , Rondonia, 62 km SE Ariquemes, 7–18.Nov.1995, W.J. Hanson. OSUC 141275 View Materials .” ♀ FSCA “ Brazil, Rondonia, 7 Km NW Costa Marques , 5.XI.1986. R. Wilkerson coll. OSUC21389 View Materials .” ♀ FSCA “ Brazil, Rondonia, 7 Km NW Costa Marques , 7.XI.1986. R. Wilkerson coll. OSUC 141276 View Materials .” ♀ INPA “ Brasil, Amazonas, road AM­10 Km 16, Paxiúba , 23.V.1992, Felipe, às 8: 30 as 12: 0 0. OSUC21390 View Materials .” ♀ QBUM “ Amazonas, Brasil, Parú de Leste [= Parú de Este ], J.C.M. Carvalho col. OSUC 141277 View Materials .” ♀ UCDC “Brazil, RO, Fazenda Rancho Grande, 62 km s. Ariquemes , 1.XII.1991. S.L. Heydon. OSUC 141278 View Materials .” PERU: ♀ AEIC “Hera, S. Martin , 860 m, Peru, VI.25.47, F. Woytkowski. OSUC 141279 View Materials .” ♀ AEIC “Hera, S. Martin , 860 m, Peru, VI.9.47, F. Woytkowski. OSUC 141280 View Materials .” VENEZUELA: ♀ IZAV “Venezuela T.F Amazonas Dpt Rio Negro, Rio Bacia, 140 m, 0º55’N 66º10’W. C. Padilla , 25.III–15.IV.1984. OSUC 141281 View Materials .” ♂ QBUM “ Belém, Utinga, Est. do Pará , Almeida col., VIII.1936. OSUC 141282 View Materials .”

Megischus Brullé

Stephanus of authors (nec Panzer, 1800; nec Jurine, 1807).

Pimpla View in CoL (part): Fabricius, 1804: 112.

Megischus Brullé, 1846: 537 . Type species: Stephanus furcatus LePeletier & Serville, 1825 , designated by Viereck (1914). Aguiar (2004b) gives full synonymic list and catalog of the world species.

Bothrioceros Sichel, 1860: 759 .

Madegafoenus (part): Benoit, 1951: 269, 278, 284.

Cladistic analyses in preparation by the author clearly indicate that none of the published interpretations of the worldwide genus Megischus Brullé correspond to monophyletic groups. It has been recovered as a highly paraphyletic group, composed of several independent clades, while also containing, spread out in the tree, several species attributed in the literature to the genera Afromegischus or Madegafoenus . Nonetheles, although highly paraphyletic, Megischus sensu lato can be isolated within Stephanidae as a taxon apical to Stephanus Jurine and basal to Hemistephanus Enderlein. The genus Hemistephanus has often been included as part of Megischus , but undoubtedely represents a monophyletic unit ( Aguiar, 1998, 2004a).

Although not ideal, the above delimitation of Megischus is at least partially useful, providing a reasonably well delimited group of species for taxonomic work. A strictly monophyletic interpretation of Megischus will greatly limit its definition, and lead to many taxonomic changes, e.g., to accomodate several, unstable clades, which would be left unnamed.

Recognition of Megischus s. l. in the Americas is easily achieved by noting the following features. Absence of a intercoxal bridge between the hind legs ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 35–42 ) (vs. present in all Foenatopus s. l.); fore wing vein 2­1A tubular and nearly complete, almost closing cell 2Cu posteriorly, although sometimes weak in small specimens, particularly in small males (vs. 2­1A never beyond basal 0.35 of cell 2Cu, usually much less); and fore wing vein M+Cu with a group of short, stiff setae placed at its very apex (vs. setae placed far from apex in all species of the Central and South American Hemistephanus).

DZUP

Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure

FSCA

Florida State Collection of Arthropods, The Museum of Entomology

INPA

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia

UCDC

R. M. Bohart Museum of Entomology

AEIC

American Entomological Institute

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Stephanidae

Genus

Foenatopus

Loc

Foenatopus aurantiiceps Brues

Aguiar, Alexandre P. 2006
2006
Loc

Foenatopus fritzi:

Aguiar, A. P. 1998: 364
1998
Loc

Neostephanus fritzi

DeSantis, L. 1967: 51
Orfila, R. N. 1956: 6
1956
Loc

Madegafoenus

Benoit, P. L. G. 1951: 269
1951
Loc

Foenatopus aurantiiceps

Aguiar, A. P. 2004: 20
DeSantis, L. 1980: 10
Brues, C. T. 1915: 1
1915
Loc

Bothrioceros

Sichel, J. 1860: 759
1860
Loc

Megischus Brullé, 1846 : 537

Brulle, A. 1846: 537
1846
Loc

Pimpla

Fabricius, J. C. 1804: 112
1804
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF