Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.360.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/215C7822-6A3F-9167-BA83-FEA0FD25FB60 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912 |
status |
|
Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912 , stat. n.
Fig. 6, 6A View Figs 1–6. 1
Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912: 406 , ♀, ♂; lectotype – ♂ (design. Bohart & French, 1986),
"Altai, Semipalatinsk" [ Kazakhstan], examined [HNHM] (ignita group).
Chrysis csikiana: Vinokurov, 2006c: 21 ; 2010b: 1277; 2013: 1107.
Chrysis fouqueti: Vinokurov, 2010a: 40 .
Chrysis fouqueti csikiana: Rosa et al., 2017 b: 135 .
SPECIMENS EXAMINED. Russia: North Caucasus: Stavropol Terr.: Dzhi-
nalskij crest, env. Kislovodsk, 820 m, 23.V 2009, 2♀ (NV) [ PRC]; 6 km from vill .
Vernaya Balkarya on Cherek river, 26.V 2005, 1♀ (NV) [ PRC] ).
DISTRIBUTION. Russia (European part), China (Xinjiang), Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan (Tarbinsky, 2000).
REMARKS. Linsenmaier (1959) considered Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912 as a valid species and C. fouqueti du Buysson, 1908 as its subspecies, disregarding the
Principle of Priority. According to Linsenmaier (1959) C. c. csikiana is the Central
Asian subspecies, with simple punctuation on the metasomal terga 2–3, and C. c.
fouqueti the Oriental subspecies with different (closer) punctuation on the metasomal tergum 2. Chryis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912 and C. nitidularia Mocsáry, 1912 were synonymized by Kimsey & Bohart (1991) with C. fouqueti (du Buysson, 1908) .
Vinokurov (2006a, 2006c, 2010a) changed his interpretation of this species,
found on Caucasian mountains. Therefore Linsenmaier’s (1959) interpretation was followed by Rosa et al. (2017 b), considering this taxon as C. fouqueti csikiana because of obvious differences in body punctation and shape of the black spots on the sternum 2. After a recent examination of some Caucasian specimens ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1–6. 1 ),
collected by N. Vinokurov, and material preserved in Semenov’s collection from
Kazakhstan, I confirm that C. csikiana is a valid species, whose female is easily recognizable from C. fouqueti for the different structure of the head in frontal view,
with subparallel malar spaces, the shape of the apical margin of the last tergum, and the shape of the black spots. The female is highly dimorphic, for its peculiar shape of the head ( Fig. 6A View Figs 1–6. 1 ), whereas the male has a typical C. ignita face (see pictures of the male lectotype in Rosa et al. 2017 d).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912
Rosa, P. 2018 |
Chrysis fouqueti csikiana:
Rosa 2017: 135 |
Chrysis fouqueti:
Vinokurov 2010: 40 |
Chrysis csikiana:
Vinokurov 2006: 21 |
Chrysis csikiana Mocsáry, 1912: 406
Mocsary 1912: 406 |