Promanus Sharp, 1877

Kolibáč, Jiří, Schmied, Heiko, Wappler, Torsten & Kubisz, Daniel, 2010, A description of Promanodes serafini gen. et sp. nov. from Baltic amber, with a review of related New Zealand Promanus Sharp, 1877 (Coleoptera: Trogossitidae), Zootaxa 2620 (1), pp. 29-44 : 35

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2620.1.2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6209969
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB7C87DC-FFDA-FFDE-FF32-7F49990EF5CD
treatment provided by	Plazi (2016-04-10 10:43:57, last updated 2024-11-27 08:26:01)
scientific name	Promanus Sharp, 1877
status

Treatment

Type species: Promanus depressus Sharp, 1877

Remarks. The type species was described in detail and illustrated by Kolibáč (2005) and its morphological characters were listed repeatedly by Kolibáč (2006). A phylogenetic position and classification within the tribe Lophocaterini were also mentioned in the latter paper and Kolibáč (2008).

Two other species of Promanus , P. auripilis Broun, 1893 and P. subcostatus Broun, 1909 , were studied preparing this communication. Generally, they are very similar to P. depressus , therefore, the genus is rather morphologically homogenous. Differences among all three species are listed in Table 2 View TABLE 2 . P. auripilis and P. costatus are similar each other. There are no significant differences in their sternites and tergites VIII ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 9 , 14, 15 View FIGURES 12 – 16 , 18, 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ) as well as in ovipositors and membranous parts of female reproductory organs ( Figs 12, 13, 16 View FIGURES 12 – 16 ). Morphological differences mentioned in Table 2 View TABLE 2 are distinct but only single specimen of the each species was for study at disposal. That is not excluded that outer morphological characters, i.e. the elytral carinae, shape of mesosternal anterior margin, sculpture of head, body colour and body size, are variable in fact. The larger series of Promanus specimens should be studied to resolve the status of the both mentioned species. P. depressus differs distinctly from them, especially in body colour which is brown-black in all three studied specimens.

References

Kolibac, J. (2005) A review of the Trogositidae. Part 1: Morphology of the genera (Coleoptera, Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey, 27, 39 - 159.

Kolibac, J. (2006) A review of the Trogossitidae. Part 2: Larval morphology, phylogeny and taxonomy (Coleoptera, Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey, 28, 105 - 153.

Kolibac, J. (2008) Morphology, taxonomy and phylogeny of Phloiophilus edwardsi Stephens, 1830 (Coleoptera, Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey, 30, 105 - 133.

Figures

FIGURES 7 – 11. 7 – 9 Promanodes serafini gen. et sp. nov.: (7) body ventrally, partial reconstruction; (8) radial cell area of wing; (9) mouth parts ventrally. 10 – 11 Promanus subcostatus Broun: (10) female tergite VIII; (11) female sternite VIII. (J. Kolibáċ del.).

FIGURES 12 – 16. (12) Promanus subcostatus Broun: ovipositor, transparent view. 13 – 16 P. auripilis Broun: (13) female copulatory organs; (14) female tergite VIII; (15) female sternite VIII; (16) apical part of ovipositor, transparent view. (J. Kolibáċ del.).

FIGURES 17 – 22. Promanus depressus Sharp: (17) wing; (18) female sternite VIII; (19) female tergite VIII; (20) maxillary palp; (21) labial palp; (22) hind leg. (J. Kolibáċ del.).