Ophiuroidea, Gray, 1840

Goharimanesh, Mona, Stöhr, Sabine, Mirshamsi, Omid, Ghassemzadeh, Fereshteh & Adriaens, Dominique, 2021, Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions, European Journal of Taxonomy 766 (1), pp. 1-63 : 15-19

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.766.1483

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:19110F18-6E35-4C50-B362-7BC742B0B5D5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5527071

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B7687F6-422C-627A-D4EA-FE81FAF4FE3F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Ophiuroidea
status

 

Conventional identification key to the families of the Ophiuroidea View in CoL with respect to the species listed in Table 1 View Table 1

1. Longest arm spines shorter than half a segment ........................................................................ 2

– Longest arm spines between half and one segment long ........................................................ 12

– Longest arm spines between one and two segments long ....................................................... 20

– Longest arm spines longer than two segments ........................................................................ 32

2(1). Arm spines tapering (conical) ( Fig. 5 View Fig ) ...................................................................................... 3

– Arm spines flat ( Fig. 5 View Fig ) ........................................... Ophiodermatidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 34]

– Arm spines cylindrical ( Fig. 5 View Fig ) .................................................................................................. 4

– Arm spines pointed ( Fig. 5 View Fig ) ....................................................................................................... 6

3(2). Arm combs present ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); dorsal arm plate present; spines all similar in shape ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); arm spines mainly lateral ......................................................... Ophiopyrgidae Perrier, 1893 View in CoL [p. 25]

– Arm combs absent; dorsal arm plate absent; spines not all similar in shape ( Fig. 2F–H View Fig ); arm spines at proximal segments only on ventral side of arms .... Asteronychidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 19]

4(2). Radial shield scalene (oblique) triangular ( Fig. 1E View Fig ) ......... Astrophiuridae Sladen, 1879 View in CoL [p. 24]

– Radial shield isosceles (mirror-symmetric) triangular to pear-shaped ( Fig. 1F View Fig )....................... 5

– Radial shield bar-like ( Fig. 1B View Fig ) .................................................. Euryalidae Gray, 1840 View in CoL [p. 20]

5(4). Arm combs present ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); arm spines mainly lateral; tentacle scales more than two times as long as wide; dorsal disc scale/plate without tubercles ( Fig. 2B–D View Fig ) .......................................... ........................................................................................... Ophiopyrgidae Perrier, 1893 View in CoL [p. 25]

– Arm combs absent; arm spines at proximal segments only on ventral side of arms; tentacle scales nearly as long as wide; dorsal disc scale/plate with tubercles ( Fig. 2A View Fig ) .................................... .......................................................................................... Hemieuryalidae Verrill, 1899 View in CoL [p. 40]

6(2). Tentacle scales nearly as long as wide ....................................................................................... 7

– Tentacle scales slightly longer than wide .................................................................................. 8

– Tentacle scales more than two times as long as wide .............................................................. 10

7(6). Tentacle scales shorter than the spine nearby; tentacle scales cross section round; disc pentagonal; dorsal disc with spines ( Fig. 2B–D View Fig ) ................... Ophiosphalmidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 22]

– Tentacle scales as long as the spine nearby; tentacle scales cross section oval; disc circular; dorsal disc without spines ( Fig. 1A–B, D–F View Fig ) .............................. Astrophiuridae Sladen, 1879 View in CoL [p. 24]

8(6). Accessory dorsal arm plate present; dorsal disc with obvious primary plates ( Fig. 2D View Fig ); adoral shield meeting in front of the oral shield; distance between spine articulations dorsalwards increasing .................................................................... Ophiolepididae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 39]

– Accessory dorsal arm plate absent; dorsal disc with concealed primary plates ( Fig. 1A–D View Fig ); adoral shield separated ( Fig. 4 View Fig ); distance between spine articulations equal ....................................... 9

9(8). Arm spines predominantly parallel to arm axis (adpressed); integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ); dorsal disc without scales; dorsal disc with spines ( Fig 2B, D View Fig ) .................................................. ................................................................................... Ophiopezidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 35]

– Arm spines predominantly erect, standing perpendicular to arm axis; integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ); dorsal disc with scales ( Fig. 2B, D View Fig ); dorsal disc without spines ( Fig.1A–B, D–F View Fig ) ............................................................................. Ophiomyxidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 36]

10(6). Arm combs present ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); disc circular; genital papillae present; distance between spine articulations dorsalwards increasing.................................. Ophiopyrgidae Perrier, 1893 View in CoL [p. 25]

– Arm combs absent; disc pentagonal; genital papillae absent; distance between spine articulations equal .........................................................................................................................................11

11(10). Arm spines predominantly parallel to arm axis (adpressed); tentacle scales longer than the spine nearby; tentacle pores visible only on proximal arm; dorsal disc with obvious primary plates ( Fig. 2D View Fig ) ................................................................. Ophiomusaidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 23]

– Arm spines predominantly erect, standing perpendicular to arm axis; tentacle scales shorter than the spine nearby; tentacle pores visible along most of the arm; dorsal disc with concealed primary plates ( Fig. 1B–D View Fig ) ....................................................... Ophiomyxidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 36]

12(1). Arm spines predominantly parallel to arm axis (adpressed) ................................................... 13

– Arm spines predominantly erect, standing perpendicular to arm axis .................................... 16

13(12). Tentacle scales nearly as long as wide ..................................................................................... 14

– Tentacle scales slightly longer than wide ................................................................................ 15

– Tentacle scales more than two times as long as wide ....... Ophiopyrgidae Perrier, 1893 View in CoL [p. 25]

14(13). Arm spines cylindrical ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); radial shield isosceles (mirror-symmetric) triangular to pearshaped ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); the ratio of thickness of distal ⅓ of arm spine to maximum thickness (in a given cross-sectional plane) 0.9–1 ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); arm spines at proximal segments only on ventral side of arms ................................................................................. Hemieuryalidae Verrill, 1899 View in CoL [p. 40]

– Arm spines pointed ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); radial shield scalene (oblique) triangular ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); the ratio of thickness of distal ⅓ of arm spine to maximum thickness (in a given cross-sectional plane) 0.6–0.9 ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); arm spines mainly lateral ................. Ophioleucidae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 38]

15(13). Arm combs present ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); spines all similar in shape; arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ) ...... Ophiuridae Müller & Troschel, 1840 View in CoL [p. 24]

– Arm combs absent; spines not all similar in shape ( Fig. 2F–H View Fig ); arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) ......... Ophiernidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 37]

16(12). Integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ); nerve opening approximately as large as muscle opening .................................................................................................................................... 17

– Integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ); nerve opening smaller than muscle opening ........... 18

17(16). Tentacle scales nearly as long as wide; radial shield length between one third and half of the disc radius; arm spine articulation ventralwards increasing in size ................................................... ........................................................................................ Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 44]

– Tentacle scales slightly longer than wide; radial shield length more than half of the disc radius; arm spine articulation larger in middle of arm ............... Ophiactidae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 46]

18(16). Arm covering without granules/spines/tubercles; arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); arm spines mainly lateral; genital slit longer than half the length of an interradius ....................... 19

– Arm covering with granules; arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); arm spines at proximal segments only on ventral side of arms; genital slit shorter than half the length of an interradius .............................................................................. Gorgonocephalidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 21]

19(18). Tentacle scales present; dorsal disc with scales ( Fig. 2B, D View Fig ); radial shield without granules/spines ( Fig. 1B View Fig ); ventral teeth single ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ..................... Ophionereididae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 42]

– Tentacle scales absent; dorsal disc without scales; radial shield with granules ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); ventral teeth several (tooth papillae) ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ........................ Ophiobyrsidae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 29]

20(1). Integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ) .......................................................................... 21

– Integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) .................................................................................... 26

21(20). Radial shield length between one third and half of the disc radius ......................................... 22

– Radial shield length more than half of the disc radius ............................................................ 25

22(21). Arm combs present ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); arm spines predominantly parallel to arm axis (adpressed); tentacle scales slightly longer than wide; ventral teeth several (tooth papillae) ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) .......................... ............................................................................. Ophiuridae Müller & Troschel, 1840 View in CoL [p. 24]

– Arm combs absent; arm spines predominantly erect, standing perpendicular to arm axis; tentacle scales nearly as long as wide; ventral teeth single ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ..................................................... 23

23(22). Accessory dorsal arm plate present; accessory ventral arm plate present; spines not all similar in shape ( Fig. 2F–H View Fig ); dorsal and/or ventral edge(s) of LAPs with constriction ( Fig. 2I View Fig ) .......... ................................................................................. Ophiopholidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 47]

– Accessory dorsal arm plate absent; accessory ventral arm plate absent; spines all similar in shape; dorsal and/or ventral edge(s) of LAPs without constriction ( Fig. 2J View Fig ) .................................... 24

24(23). The number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius about 7–14; arm spine articulation larger in middle of arm; dental plate ventral half widest; dental sockets less than 50% of the width .................................................................... Ophiothamnidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 46]

– The number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius about 14–21; arm spine articulation ventralwards increasing in size; dental plate dorsal half widest; dental sockets equal to or more than 50% of the width .................................................... Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 44]

25(21). Tentacle scales present; dorsal disc with spines ( Fig. 2B, D View Fig ); arm spine articulation larger in middle of arm; nerve opening approximately as large as muscle opening .................................. ........................................................................................ Ophiactidae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 46]

– Tentacle scales absent; dorsal disc without spines ( Fig. 1A–B, D–F View Fig ); arm spine articulation ventralwards increasing in size; nerve opening smaller than muscle opening ............................ .................................................................................. Amphilepididae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 45]

26(20). Tentacle scales nearly as long as wide ..................................................................................... 27

– Tentacle scales slightly longer than wide ................................................................................ 28

– Tentacle scales more than two times as long as wide .............................................................. 30

27(26). Arm spines flat; the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius more than 21; arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); ventral teeth several (tooth papillae) ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ......................... .......................................................................................... Ophiotomidae Paterson, 1985 View in CoL [p. 30]

– Arm spines pointed ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius about 7–14; arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); ventral teeth single ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ................................. .................................................................................... Ophiacanthidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 33]

28(26). Arm spines predominantly parallel to arm axis (adpressed); radial shield absent ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); ventral interradii with spines; ventro-distal tip of LAP projecting ventralwards ( Fig. 2K View Fig ) .................... .............................................................................................. Ophiohelidae Perrier, 1893 View in CoL [p. 27]

– Arm spines predominantly erect, standing perpendicular to arm axis; radial shield present; ventral interradii with granules; ventro-distal tip of LAP not projecting ventralwards ( Fig. 2L View Fig ) ....... 29

29(28). Radial shield scalene (oblique) triangular; the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius more than 21; arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); radial shield with granules ..... .......................................................................................... Ophiotomidae Paterson, 1985 View in CoL [p. 30]

– Radial shield isosceles (mirror-symmetric) triangular to pear-shaped ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius about 14–21; arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); radial shield without granules/spines ( Fig. 1B View Fig ) ....... Ophionereididae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 42]

30(26). Tentacle scales shorter than the spine nearby; the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius about 14–21; oral shield covering less than one third of interradius; at least one socket on DP as depression or perforation without septum ................................................................ 31

– Tentacle scales longer than the spine nearby; the number of scales on H line ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) of an interradius more than 21; oral shield covering more than one third of the length of an interradius; at least one socket on DP as perforation with septum ................................................................. ...................................................................................... Ophiopsilidae Matsumoto, 1915 View in CoL [p. 43]

31(30). Arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales cross section oval; radial shield absent ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); ventral interradii without granules/spines .... Ophioscolecidae Lütken, 1869 View in CoL [p. 28]

– Arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales cross section round; radial shield present ( Fig. 1C View Fig ); ventral interradii with spines ................ Amphilimnidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 41]

32(1). Radial shield length less than one third of the disc radius ...................................................... 33

– Radial shield length between one third and half of the disc radius ......................................... 35

– Radial shield length more than half of the disc radius ............................................................ 36

33(32). Radial shield scalene (oblique) triangular ( Fig. 1E View Fig ); arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ); radial shield with granules ( Fig. 1A View Fig ) ....................... 34

– Radial shield isosceles (mirror-symmetric) triangular to pear-shaped ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ); radial shield without granules/spines ( Fig. 1B View Fig ) ............................................ Ophiomyxidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 36]

34(33). Adoral shield separated; ventral position of LAP projecting ventro-proximalwards ( Fig. 2K View Fig ); disc flat (about same level as arms); lateral oral papillae multiple rows of lateral papillae ........ ...................................................................................... Ophiocomidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 36]

– Adoral shield meeting in front of the oral shield; ventral position of LAP not projecting ventroproximalwards ( Fig. 2L View Fig ); disc high (above arm level); lateral oral papillae single row of lateral papillae ( Fig. 2E View Fig ) ............................................................. Ophiotomidae Paterson, 1985 View in CoL [p. 30]

35(32). Arm covering without granules/spines/tubercles; arm spines pointed ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales nearly as long as wide; integument obscuring plates ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) .................................................. .................................................................................... Ophiacanthidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 33]

– Arm covering with tubercles grown out of scales/plates; arm spines cylindrical ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales slightly longer than wide; integument not obscuring plates ( Fig. 1E–F View Fig ) .......................... .............................................................................. Ophiocamacidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 29]

36(32). Tentacle scales nearly as long as wide ..................................................................................... 37

– Tentacle scales more than two times as long as wide ............................................................. 38

37(36). Accessory ventral arm plate present; tentacle scales cross section round; scales on ventral interradii absent; ventral teeth several (tooth papillae) ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) .................................................. .................................................................................. Ophiopteridae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 31]

– Accessory ventral arm plate absent; tentacle scales cross section oval; scales on ventral interradii covering the whole area of an interradius; ventral teeth single ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) ...................................... .................................................................................... Ophiacanthidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 33]

38(36). Arm spines flat ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales shorter than the spine nearby; arm spine cross section oval ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales cross section oval ........ Clarkcomidae O’Hara et al., 2018 View in CoL [p. 32]

– Arm spines pointed ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales as long as the spine nearby; arm spine cross section round ( Fig. 5 View Fig ); tentacle scales cross section round ..... Ophiotrichidae Ljungman, 1867 View in CoL [p. 48]

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF