Taxonomic revision of the spider family Penestomidae (Araneae, Entelegynae) Author Miller, Jeremy A. Author Griswold, Charles E. Author Haddad, Charles R. text Zootaxa 2010 2534 1 36 http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2010/f/zt02534p036.pdf journal article zt02534p036 8F657D94-8DD3-4184-BB90-A43C3268DF42 Family Penestomidae Simon, 1903 Penestominae Simon, 1903 : 979 . Type genus Penestomus Simon, 1902 . Lehtinen, 1967: 385-390 ; Dippenaar-Schoeman, 1989: 131. Penestomidae . Miller et al., 2010: 801. Affinities. Removal of the Penestominae from the Eresidae was justified by analysis of molecular sequence data (Miller et al. 2010). These data consistently indicated that penestomines are close to the Zodariidae , and that this relationship has significantly better support than one constrained to include a monophyletic Eresidae including Penestominae (Shimodaira & Hasegawa 1999) . One line of morphological evidence that could support a close relationship between zodariids and penestomids has to do with the arrangement of spigots on the anterior lateral spinnerets. Typically, the major ampullate gland spigots ( MAP ) are placed on the margin of the spinning field (e.g. see Griswold et al. 2005, fig. 49 B ) but in both zodariids (Miller et al. 2010, fig. 2 E ) and penestomids (Fig. 6 B ) the MAP are placed in the center of the field of piriform gland spigots ( PI ). The Zodariidae are diagnosed by several characters not found in Penestominae (i.e. absence of serrula, lateral implantation of tarsal claw teeth, long anterior lateral spinnerets; see Jocque 1991). Inclusion of Penestominae within the entirely ecribellate Zodariidae would radically change and complicate the diagnosis of this expanded family concept. For these reasons, Miller et al. (2010) promoted Penestominae to family rank.