Sylvicanthon monnei, Cupello & Vaz-De, 2018

Cupello, Mario & Vaz-De, Fernando Z., 2018, A monographic revision of the Neotropical dung beetle genus Sylvicanthon Halffter & Martínez, 1977 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Deltochilini), including a reappraisal of the taxonomic history of ‘ Canthon sensu lato’, European Journal of Taxonomy 467, pp. 1-205 : 160-163

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.467

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D27AAB8-B7F2-424C-B1A6-66FEFA66EDFF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3846339

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/045BB71E-7DD7-4EE3-B7AE-E087F656F754

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:045BB71E-7DD7-4EE3-B7AE-E087F656F754

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Sylvicanthon monnei
status

sp. nov.

Sylvicanthon monnei View in CoL sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:045BB71E-7DD7-4EE3-B7AE-E087F656F754

Figs 13C View Fig , 19D View Fig , 20 View Fig , 41 View Fig , 43B, E View Fig , 44 View Fig C–D

Etymology

A tribute to the Uruguayan-Brazilian entomologist Miguel A. Monné, one of the leading specialists in the New World fauna of Cerambycidae and author of the main catalogue of the family’s Neotropical species plus almost 200 papers dealing with longhorn beetle taxonomy. As the first author’s supervisor throughout his entire undergraduation (2009–2013), it was prof. Monné who first opened doors so that he could work as a zoologist. Through his example and inspiration, MC’s taste for taxonomy, zoological nomenclature and history of entomology, as well as his profound respect for all the great synthesizers of scientific knowledge, quickly flourished.

Material examined

Holotype

BRAZIL: ♂, Mato Grosso, Cotriguaçu, Fazenda São Nicolau , 09º51′18″ S, 58º13′22″ W, 200 m (“BRASIL: MatoGrosso.Cotriguaçu, / Faz. São Nicolau. flor.sec. 200m / 9º51′18″ S, 58º13′22″ W. Fezes / hum. X-2009. Vaz-de-Mello”) ( CEMT).

GoogleMaps

Paratypes (8 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀)

BRAZIL: Mato Grosso: 2 ♂♂, Cotriguaçu, Fazenda São Nicolau, Prainha, 09º51′36″ S, 58º12′53″ W, Oct. 2009, pitfall, F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello leg. ( CEMT); 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, Diamantino, Fazenda São João, 14º14′10″ S, 56º08′11″ W, 400 m, 11 Jan. 2001, pitfall with dung, Génier & Vaz-de-Mello leg. ( CMNC); 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Porto Estrela, ESEC Serra das Araras, Olho d’Água, 14 Oct. 2011, pitfall, M. Gigliotti leg. ( CEMT); 1 ♂, Porto Estrela, ESEC Serra das Araras, Trilha Bocado do José, 15º38′50″ S, 57º12′27″ W, 238 m, 10 Oct. 2011, pitfall, F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello leg. ( CEMT); 1 ♂, Querência, Fazenda São Luiz, 12º39.94′ S, 52º21.85′ W, 14 Jul. 2008, pitfall, R. Andrade leg. ( CEMT); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Querência, Fazenda São Luiz, 12º39.64′ S, 52º22.74′ W, 17 Jul. 2008, pitfall, R. Andrade leg. ( CEMT). – Pará: 1 ♀, São Félix do Xingu, Pinkaití Reserve, 07º45′ S, 51º57′ W, 12 Nov. 1998, P.Y. Scheffler leg. ( CEMT).

Description

COLOURATION. Head, pronotum, elytra and pygidium predominantly dark green. Metaventrite very dark, black with soft greenish reflections. Meso- and metafemora reddish-brown or dark brown.

HEAD. Tegument shiny, with well-marked micropunctation and weak alveolar microsculpture, in some specimens very effaced or even absent in some parts of head; micropunctation almost imperceptible or absent at apex of clypeus. Clypeus with two apical teeth obtuse and only slightly separated from one another; with single transverse row of short setae covering base of both teeth. Genae with weak denticle immediately behind clypeal-genal juncture. Posterior edge of head unmargined between eyes.

THORAX. Pronotum with shiny tegument with dense micropunctation at centre; towards the sides, micropunctation progressively less well marked, but always present and evident; alveolar microsculpture present only on anterolateral angles and in narrow strip on sides; at centre, tegument smooth. Posterior edge with fine transverse line at centre (usually extending up to second elytral stria) which, occasionally, can be difficult to see. Hypomeral cavity with some long yellowish setae at centre; external edge with weak tubercle. Metaventrite glabrous at centre; sides with few sparse setae near anterior margin of metacoxae ( Fig. 7B View Fig ); anterior region of metaventrite with tegument with strong rivose microsculpture; centre and posterior region with dense micropunctation and without microsculpture.

LEGS.Ventral surface of all femora and tibiae bright.Profemora with tegument with sparse micropunctation and without microsculpture at anterior half and with strong rivose microsculpture at posterior half. Protibiae narrow and with distinct expansion on internal edge; at apical third, external edge with three small acute teeth, two most apical ones subequal in length and larger than basal ( Fig. 11E View Fig ). Mesofemora margined anteriorly only at basal half; unmargined portion of anterior edge with row of very short setae; posterior margin absent; tegument smooth and with sparse micropunctation, except apical anterior half, which has strong rivose microsculpture. Metafemora margined only anteriorly, posterior margin absent; apical third of anterior edge covered by row of setae; tegument with rivose microsculpture at anterior half and smooth with sparse micropunctation at posterior half; with strong coarse elongate punctation at base ( Fig. 13C View Fig ). Metatarsomeres II and V subequal in length and longer than others; metatarsomere IV shorter than others.

ELYTRA. With only seven narrow visible striae: first three or four well marked, finely carinulate, and widened at base; fifth to seventh progressively more effaced and interrupted; all striae lack carinulae before reaching apex of elytra, where they are marked only by microsculpture or completely indistinct; humeral carina absent. Tegument of interstriae shiny, without microsculpture, and with very dense micropunctation.

ABDOMEN. Tegument of ventrites I–IV with strong rivose microsculpture; ventrite VI smooth at centre and with weak rivose microsculpture on sides. Pygidium with bright tegument, without microsculpture, and with dense micropunctation (occasionally, weak microsculpture present on the sides of pygidium).

AEDEAGUS. Parameres longer than half-length of phallobase and without any noticeable asymmetry, with both external faces flat. In lateral view, parameres with apex slightly bifurcate, with inferior branch of bifurcation only very slightly projected and parallel to superior branch; without ventral keel or notch ( Figs 19D View Fig , 44 View Fig C–D).

SEXUAL DIMORPHISM. Males: Protibial spur broad and bifid, with external projection spiniform and not much longer than internal projection, which is bent and widened ( Fig. 15N View Fig ). Abdomen without lateral foveae. Ventrite VI strongly narrowed at centre due to a distinct emargination on posterior edge; anterior edge slightly covered by weak medial flange of posterior edge of ventrite V. Pygidium very long (length between 1.2 and 1.0 mm) and convex; apical margin of pygidium much wider than lateral margins. Females: Protibial spur spiniform. Abdomen with three pairs of transverse foveae located between ventrites I–II, II–III, and III–IV, respectively; foveae not margined by row of long setae ( Fig. 16A View Fig ). Ventrite VI very broad at centre, posterior edge straight, without emargination; anterior edge subtly covered by weak medial flange of posterior edge of ventrite V. Pygidium shorter (about 0.9 mm) and flat; apical margin of pygidium only slightly wider than lateral margins.

Measurements

Males (N = 5). TL: AV: 6.6 ± 0.25; MX: 6.8; MN: 6.3. EW: AV: 4.9 ± 0.29; MX: 5.3; MN: 4.6. PrL: AV: 2.2 ± 0.13; MX: 2.4; MN: 2.1. PrW: AV: 4.4 ± 0.21; MX: 4.6; MN: 4.1. PgL: AV: 1.1 ± 0.09; MX: 1.2; MN: 1.0. PgW: AV: 2.2 ± 0.14; MX: 2.4; MN: 2.1.

Females (N = 3). TL: AV: 6.5 ± 0.20; MX: 6.7; MN: 6.3. EW: AV: 4.9 ± 0.28; MX: 5.1; MN: 4.7. PrL: AV: 2.1 ± 0.21; MX: 2.3; MN: 1.9. PrW: AV: 4.1 ± 0.3; MX: 4.4; MN: 3.8. PgL: AV: 0.9 ± 0.0; MX: 0.9; MN: 0.9. PgW: AV: 2.1 ± 0.0; MX: 2.1; MN: 2.1.

Geographical distribution

Southern Amazonia in Brazil.

Ecoregions

Xingu-Tocantins-Araguaia Moist Forests, Madeira-Tapajós Moist Forests, Mato Grosso Tropical Dry Forests, Chiquitano Dry Forests.

Collecting sites ( Fig. 41 View Fig )

BRAZIL. Pará: São Félix do Xingu. Mato Grosso: Cotriguaçu, Diamantino, Porto Estrela (Estação Ecológica Serra das Araras), Querência.

Intraspecific variation and taxonomic discussion

The two most closely related species to S. monnei sp. nov. are S. mayri sp. nov. and S. furvus , from which it can be differentiated by the following combination of characteristics: elytral tegument without any alveolar microsculpture among micropunctation (alveolar microsculpture strongly impressed in S. furvus , and diffuse, but still present in S. mayri sp. nov.), parameres with both branches of apical bifurcation only slightly divergent, the inferior branch being straight and little projected ( Fig. 44 View Fig C–D) (parameres strongly bifurcate at apex in S. mayri sp. nov. ( Fig. 44 View Fig A–B) and S. furvus , with the inferior branch well developed and widely divergent from the superior branch) and distribution in southern Amazonia ( Fig. 41 View Fig ) (on the slopes of Andes in Peru and Bolivia for S. furvus and western Amazonia for S. mayri sp. nov.). A detailed comparison between these three species can be found in the discussion of S. furvus and on Table 5.

Two species of Sylvicanthon can be found in sympatry with S. monnei sp. nov.: S. candezei and S. proseni . From the first, S. monnei sp. nov. can be readily distinguished as follows: protibiae tridentate and with a distinct expansion on their internal margin ( Fig. 11E View Fig ) (bidentate and straight on its internal margin in S. candezei , Fig. 11J View Fig ), females with three pairs of abdominal foveae ( Fig. 16A View Fig ) (without foveae in S. candezei ) and parameres, in lateral view, without any notch on its inferior edge ( Figs 19D View Fig , 44C View Fig ) (with a profound notch on the middle of ventral edge in S. candezei , Fig. 17C View Fig ). It is interesting to note that individuals from southern populations of S. candezei , i.e., those that can be in sympatry with S. monnei sp. nov., differ from northern specimens in having elytra without trace of microsculpture in the same way as seen in S. monnei sp. nov.

Comments

The holotype and two paratypes of S. monnei sp. nov. are part of a large series of dung beetles collected during a faunistic survey on the São Nicolau farm (“Fazenda São Nicolau”), in the municipality of Cotriguaçu (Mato Grosso, Brazil), done in two campaigns at the end of 2009; the three type specimens were caught during the first campaign, between the 5 th and 16 th of October. The survey was published by Vaz-de-Mello et al. (2011b), but, curiously, no Sylvicanthon (except S. proseni , then cited in Canthon ) were included in the final list of 118 species present at the farm. Since 2009, three other new species were described from that material: Lobidion punctatissimum Génier, 2010 of Ateuchini (which was recently transferred to Ateuchus by Génier & Cupello 2018), and Deltochilum (Aganhyboma) schefflerorum Silva et al., 2015 and Hansreia peugeoti Valois et al., 2015 both in Deltochilini .

Natural history

The little we know on the biology of S. monnei sp. nov. is thanks to the information contained on specimen labels. Known specimens were collected in pitfall traps baited with human faeces in January, July, October and November. The species is found in altitudes between 230 and 400 m, in both primary and secondary semideciduous forests, but it is probably rare in both habitats.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Scarabaeidae

Genus

Sylvicanthon

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF