Procloeon (Oculogaster) malabarensis sp. n., 2020

Kluge, Nikita J., 2020, Review of Oculogaster Kluge 2016 (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae, Procloeon Bengtsson 1915), Zootaxa 4820 (3), pp. 401-437 : 428-433

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:44BD1E07-C9F3-4488-936E-819C2FCA18C8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4436259

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF3A05-8D69-FF8B-FAA9-FA02A172FA05

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Procloeon (Oculogaster) malabarensis sp. n.
status

sp. nov.

Procloeon (Oculogaster) malabarensis sp. n.

( Fig. 109–133 View FIGURES 109–112 View FIGURES 113–117 View FIGURES 118–126 View FIGURES 127–133 )

? Procloeon regularum: Sivaramakrishnan & Venkataraman 1990: 211 View in CoL .

Etymology. The name refers to the historical area Malabar in India.

Material examined ( ZIN). Holotype: L-S-I ♀ { specimen [IX](11)2013}, INDIA, Karnataka, Shivamogga / Udupi districts near Agumbe , 25.I.2013, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko. Paratypes: same locality and collectors, 11–31.I.2013: 2 L-S ♂ , 1 L/S ♂, 3 L-S ♀, 3 larvae; Kerala, Kottayam district, Erumeli , 18–21.I.2016, coll. N. Kluge, L. Sheyko: 3 L-S-I ♂ , 4 S-I ♂, 4 S ♂, 2 S-I ♀, 2 S ♀, 2 larvae.

Larva. CUTICULAR COLORATION. Head with brownish and colorless areas. Pronotum and mesonotum ocher or brownish with lighter and darker areas. Metanotum and thoracic pleura with colorless and brown areas, thoracic sterna colorless. Legs colorless or brownish, either unicolor, or with diffuse brown band in distal part of femur; tarsus darkened. Abdominal terga with maculation different on different segments; most or all terga with submedian pair of blanks, either corresponding to sigilla, or larger than sigilla; terga IV and VII more-or-less lighter than others; tergum VI darker than others ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 109–112 ). Abdominal sterna lighter than terga, either unicolor, or with lighter and darker areas. Caudalii ocher with posterior margin of every 4th segment brown ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 109–112 ).

HYPODERMAL COLORATION. Either absent or (just before moult to subimago) as in respective winged stages; male ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 109–112 ; as in Figs 127–129 View FIGURES 127–133 ) and female (as in Figs 132–133 View FIGURES 127–133 ) different.

SHAPE AND SETATION. Mouth parts as in Figs 113–117 View FIGURES 113–117 ; maxillary palp 3-segmented, with 2nd and 3rd segments subequal ( Fig. 116 View FIGURES 113–117 ). Femora with very small spine-like setae on outer and inner sides, with 2 spine-like apical setae located in plane of leg ( Fig. 110 View FIGURES 109–112 ). Claws moderately long, in proximal part with two rows of minute denticles increasing distally ( Fig. 111 View FIGURES 109–112 ). Hind protoptera completely absent. Abdominal segment IX with 3–7 lateral spines on each side, other segments without lateral spines; postero-lateral spines present on segments II–IX or III–IX, being minute on anterior segments. Posterior margin of abdominal tergum I with few sparse small spine-like pointed denticles; posterior margins of terga II–X with spine-like pointed denticles of unequal length; on all terga, including tergum IX, row of denticles not interrupted medially. Abdominal terga with short scales in wide semilunar or W-shaped non-opercula-bearing sockets, with sparse fine setae. Posterior margins of abdominal sterna I–IV or I–III smooth, posterior margin of sternum V or sterna IV–V with few minute denticles, posterior margins of sterna VI–IX and paraprocts with spine-like pointed denticles of unequal length. Abdominal sterna with sparse scales and sparse fine setae not forming regular rows. Tergalii widest near base, without dorsal lamellae; costal ribs without denticles (as in Figs 118–124 View FIGURES 118–126 ). In distal part of cercus, spine on outer side of each segment as long as combined length of 2 next segments ( Fig. 112 View FIGURES 109–112 ).

Subimago. CUTICULAR COLORATION. Cuticle either entirely colorless, or with postsubalar sclerite partly brown ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 127–133 ).

HYPODERMAL COLORATION. As in imago (see below, male and female).

TEXTURE. On fore leg of male and female 1st tarsal segment covered partly with microtrichia (as tibia), partly with pointed microlepides; all other tarsal segments entirely covered with pointed microlepides (as in Figs 105–106 View FIGURES 103–108 ).

Imago, male ( Figs 128–129 View FIGURES 127–133 ). Head ocher or whitish. Antenna with scapus and pedicellus non-pigmented, flagellum either non-pigmented, or brown. Turbinate eyes widened apically; either uniformly orange, or orange with yellow ring bordering facetted surface. Thorax ocher or whitish. Legs pale ocher. In paratype, ratio femur / tibia / tarsal segments (mm) on fore leg 0.80: 1.02: 0.03: 0.47: 0.30: 0.16: 0.12; on middle and hind leg 0.68: 0.68: 0.29: 0.10: 0.03: 0.11. Middle and hind legs without apical spine on 1st+2nd tarsomere, with single apical spine on primary 3rd tarsomere (as in Fig. 105 View FIGURES 103–108 ). Wing with membrane colorless, veins ocher or brownish. Pterostigma with 1–3 oblique veins; marginal intercalary present in each interspace. Hind wing absent. Abdominal terga and sterna I–VI translucent, whitish, either without hypodermal markings, or with pair of small orange or red-brown submedian spots on tergum IV ( Fig. 127–129 View FIGURES 127–133 ); lateral tracheae black. Most part of tergum VII and smaller part of tergum VIII red-brown; terga IX–X entirely white or ocher. Genitalia non-pigmented. Median projection of penial bridge truncated ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 118–126 ). Cerci whitish.

Imago, female ( Figs 131 View FIGURES 127–133 ). Head moderately wide, distance between eyes subequal to eye length; eyes significantly elevated above head surface (as in Fig. 103 View FIGURES 103–108 ). Head and thorax ocher, without brown spots, thorax sometimes with white markings. Legs as in male (see above); fore leg without apical spine on 2nd tarsomere, with single apical spine on primary 3rd tarsomere (as in Fig. 106 View FIGURES 103–108 ); same on middle and hind legs (as in Fig. 105 View FIGURES 103–108 ) (as in male). Wings as in male (see above). Abdomen ocher; terga II–VII laterally with contrastingly brown or black markings forming oblique stripes, often interrupted; markings on segments II, IV and VII larger than others ( Figs 131–133 View FIGURES 127–133 ). Orange or red spots never present; white pigmentation between black markings either present ( Figs 131–132 View FIGURES 127–133 ) or absent ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 127–133 ). Sterna II–VII or II–VIII laterally with dark brown or black markings in form of longitudinal interrupted lines or small spots (absent in young subimagines). Lateral tracheae colored with dark brown or black. Cerci whitish.

Egg. Without rigid chorion (viviparity).

Dimension. Fore wing length 3.5–4 mm.

Comparison. The new species P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. is closely related to P. (O.) regularum , but it differs by smaller size, by truncated median projection of penial bridge and by hypodermal coloration of abdomen.

The difference in hypodermal coloration is better expressed in the female (that’s why the reared female imago is designated as the holotype). Females differ as follows (compare Figs 103–104 View FIGURES 103–108 and 131–133 View FIGURES 127–133 ): In contrast to P. (O.) regularum , whose winged females have paired reddish spots on terga IV and VII, females of P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. have no such spots, but only brown or black lateral markings. The number and shape of the brown or black lateral markings also differs in these two species: In P. (O.) regularum such markings are present beginning from tergum I, but in P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. they are present beginning from tergum II; in P. (O.) regularum markings on terga II–III and V–VI are integral and roundish, but in P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. markings on these terga have form of oblique, narrow, interrupted lines. Dark brown or black markings on abdominal sterna are present in female imagines of P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n., but are absent in all 71 examined female imagines of P. (O.) regularum .

In winged males of P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. the pair of reddish markings of abdominal tergum IV are limited to the median area of the tergum ( Fig. 127 View FIGURES 127–133 ), while in P. (O.) regularum such markings are more or less wider expanded laterally ( Figs 99–102 View FIGURES 99–102 ).

The last instar larva of P. (O.) regularum has paired reddish markings similar on terga IV and VII ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 84–89 ), that differs from the coloration of winged stages; the larva of P. (O.) malabarensis sp. n. has no such hypodermal markings; its hypodermal coloration appears just before moult to subimago, being the same as in the winged stages ( Fig. 109 View FIGURES 109–112 ).

Distribution. Southern India.

ZIN

Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Ephemeroptera

Family

Baetidae

Genus

Procloeon

Loc

Procloeon (Oculogaster) malabarensis sp. n.

Kluge, Nikita J. 2020
2020
Loc

Procloeon regularum: Sivaramakrishnan & Venkataraman 1990: 211

Sivaramakrishnan, K. G. & Venkataraman, K. 1990: 211
1990
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF