Paralecanium neomaritimum Takahashi

Chris J. Hodgson & Douglas J. Williams, 2018, Revision of the soft scale genus Paralecanium (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Coccidae) with the introduction of three new genera and twenty new species, Zootaxa 4443 (1), pp. 1-162 : 120-122

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4443.1.1

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8CF7D069-783C-4D20-8A10-6987529AB4BE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5981538

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A687D0-7B0F-037F-EEA8-FD45FDA4FB5D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paralecanium neomaritimum Takahashi
status

 

Paralecanium neomaritimum Takahashi View in CoL

( Fig. 50 View FIGURE 50 )

Paralecanium neomaritimum Takahashi, 1950 , 49. Type data: Malaysia, Selangor, Morib, on Avicennia sp. (mangrove), 30.i.1944. Type depository: BMNH, London, U.K.

Material examined. Lectotype f and paralectotype f (here designated): MALAYSIA: top labels: Type in red on small round label + lectotype in red on narrow label; bottom label: Paralecanium / neomariti- / mum / Takahashi / 30.I.1944 / Morib / Selangor / mangrove / R. Takahashi ( BMNH): 1/2adff (g; lectotype bottom right specimen).

Other material. INDONESIA, Sulawesi Utara, Dumoga-Bone National Park, Torant Base Camp area , nr. Tumpah River , on upper surface of leaves of Eugenia cf. calucob [probably calubcob 10.iii.1985, J.H. Martin # 4632 [Leider 6602] ( BMNH): 3/3adff (g-fg) + 1 adf Eucalymnatus tessellatus (Sign.) . Sulawesi Utara, Dumoga- Bone N. P., Tumpah Riverside, Torant, about 215m alt., on Eugenia cf. calucob, (probably calubcob), 10.iii.1985, J.H. Martin #4632 ( BMNH): 2/14adff (fg).

BRUNEI, Muara , on mangroves, 8.xi.1992, J.H. Martin #6210 ( BMNH): 1/1adf (f).

Note. The description is mainly based on the type specimens; data for non-type specimens in [..] brackets where significantly different.

Unmounted material. Derm black (J. Martin, pers. com.).

Slide-mounted adult female. Body broadest posteriorly; sometimes showing some asymmetry, particularly ventrally. Length 2.2–2.4 mm, width 1.8–1.9 mm.

Dorsum. Derm barely sclerotised on younger specimen but becoming rather uniformly sclerotised on older specimen; submarginally with quite large, faint oval areolations, each 17–25 µm wide with a darker border, these becoming more obscure medially; all of derm with minute pale spots, each about 0.5 µm wide. Marginal radial lines membranous, short, each about 65 µm long, as follows: with 11 lines on head, each side with 3 between stigmatic clefts and 11 on abdomen. Clear areas obscure or absent on younger specimens but clearly present on mature specimens. Dorsal setae rather short, curved with a blunt apex, each about 4–5 µm long in a small setal socket about 3 µm wide; frequent in a submarginal band (mainly within marginal radial lines) but apparently absent more medially; on older specimen, basal socket can be hard to separate from simple pores. Large dorsal pores few, each 4–5 µm wide with indistinct micropores, in a sparse submedial band; with 9–15 on each side; position of each pore rather variable. Small simple pores, each about 2 µm wide in a clear, unstained area of derm, sparse throughout, more or less in a polygonal pattern; also present sparsely along margin. Anal plates rather small, together quadrate, each with a somewhat rounded outer angle, and with anterior margin subequal to or slightly shorter than posterior margin [subequal]; each with 1 small pore and 1 seta about 8 µm long, in middle of each plate [placed more posteriorly] and perhaps 3 obscure setae on apex; length of each plate 120–140 µm, combined widths 80–105 µm. Anogenital fold with 1 pair of small setae along anterior margin, each lateral margin with 0 or 1 seta anteriorly and 1 posteriorly. Anal ring with 3 pairs of setae, ventral pair much stouter and longer than dorsal pair, ventral setae each about 235 µm long; anal tube a little longer than anal plates.

Margin. Marginal ornamentation: margin slightly wavy, with 2 or 3 shallow sclerotisations between setae but youngest specimen with corrugations, each with a shallow sclerotisation, becoming wavy on older specimens. Marginal setae oval and fan-shaped; width of each fan about 30–35 µm, length 20–23 µm; with 60–61 setae anteriorly between anterior stigmatic clefts, each side with 21–25 between stigmatic clefts, and 57–61 along abdominal margin. Stigmatic clefts quite deep, each with a sclerotised inner margin and 3 parallel-sided blunt stigmatic spines, sometimes more club-shaped; median spines longer than lateral spines but none extending out of cleft; length of median spines 25–35 µm; lateral spines each 15–25 µm long. Eyespots each rather oval; width of socket about 50–60 µm, diameter of lens 16–18 µm.

Venter. With a complete, quite narrow, darker marginal border about 40–85 µm wide, with dark radial “fingers”. Multilocular disc-pores present in groups around genital opening and in preceding segment only, each side with 3–10 (mainly 7–10) in abdominal segment VII, and 10–18 on segment VI. Spiracular disc-pores present in a narrow band of 8–14 between margin and each spiracle. Ventral microducts very small, present throughout but most abundant posterior to labium. Ventral setae: with 2 pairs of interantennal setae; 1 pair of long setae in abdominal segment VII, each seta about 90 µm long, and slightly shorter setae present medially in other abdominal and thoracic segments; submarginal setae infrequent and short. Antennae well developed, with 6 segments; total length 185–230 µm, apical segment about 39–46 µm long; apical seta 15 µm long; setal distribution normal. Clypeolabral shield small, 85–90 µm long. Spiracles small, width of each peritreme 16–18 µm. Legs well developed but small; dimensions of hind leg (µm): coxa 70–72; trochanter + femur 93–106; tibia 46–55; tarsus 50– 55, and claw very short, 8; tarsal digitules fairly long and capitate; claw digitules subequal in length to tarsal digitule, broad but one narrower than other, particularly towards base; claw without a denticle; setal distribution: coxae 5; trochanter 1; femur 2; tibia 2 and tarsus 3.

Comments. Adult female P. neomaritimum are morphologically very similar to those of P. hainanense and P. machili . Paralecanium neomaritimum differs from P. hainanense as follows (character-states for P. hainanense in brackets): (i) a long seta is present on the ventral surface of each trochanter (absent); (ii) the anal plates are clearly longer than their combined widths (plates approximately as long as their combined widths), and (iii) the large dorsal pores are about 4–5 µm wide (about 7 µm wide). Paralecanium neomaritimum differs from P. machili in the presence of large dorsal pores (absent on P. machili ) and in having dissimilar claw digitules (similar on P. machili ).

Host-plants. Eugenia calubcob ( Myrtaceae ); mangroves ( Rhizophora sp., Rhizophoraceae ). Unconfirmed host plant: Avicennia sp. ( Acanthaceae ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Coccidae

Genus

Paralecanium

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF