Tissahamia ethagala ( Huber, 2011 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4550.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F7D1EC4-D4ED-4FAE-B227-CF7B79EAE833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4581660 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA3B104C-FF8D-FF82-FF3D-FD51FCF1E02A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2019-04-03 07:01:19, last updated 2024-11-29 19:48:48) |
scientific name |
Tissahamia ethagala ( Huber, 2011 ) |
status |
|
Tissahamia ethagala ( Huber, 2011) View in CoL
Figs 93–96 View FIGURES 93–102 , 103–106 View FIGURES 103–109
Pholcus ethagala Huber 2011: 174 View in CoL , figs 741–744, 775–776, 793–804 (♂ ♀, Sri Lanka).
Tissahamia ethagala View in CoL — Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data). Huber et al. 2018: fig. 10.
Diagnosis (amendments; see Huber 2011). Males are easily distinguished from Sri Lankan congeners by details of procursus: wider and shorter, without retrolateral membrane, with two separate dorsal processes instead of single bifid process (cf. Huber 2011: fig. 794). Females are easily distinguished from Sri Lankan congeners by V-shaped brown mark anteriorly on epigynum and by round pore plates (cf. Huber 2011: figs 775, 797).
Description (amendments; see Huber 2011). Males consistently with large dark mark on carapace ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 93–102 ), either undivided or posteriorly divided. Females polymorphic in color ( Figs 103–106 View FIGURES 103–109 ): carapace either with distinctive pattern of radial lines ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 103–109 ; 31 View FIGURES 31–35 newly examined females) or with large dark mark similar to males ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 103–109 ; 6 View FIGURES 1–9 females); sternum color varies independently of carapace color: either light with posterior dark margin and some slightly darker smudges posteriorly ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 103–109 ; 23 View FIGURES 17–24 females) or entirely dark ( Fig. 106 View FIGURES 103–109 ; 14 View FIGURES 10–16 females). Female carapace pattern variable within localities (both patterns seen in Ethagala, Dimbulagala, Gowindahela); female sternum coloration apparently consistent within localities (all 10 females from Ethagala and all 3 females from Dematagala with dark sternum; all 6 females from Kandalama and all 12 females from Dimbulagala with light sternum).
New records. SRI LANKA: 1♂ 9♀, ZFMK (Ar 20056) and 3♀ 1 juv. in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL114 About ZFMK ), North Western Province, Kurunegala, at base of Ethagala ( Athugala ) Mtn (7.490°N, 80.369°E), 170 m a.s.l., 9.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 3♂ 6♀ 1 juv., ZFMK (Ar 20057) and 2♀ 1 juv. in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL118 About ZFMK ), Central Province, Kandalama Forest (7.859°N, 80.711°E), 220 m a.s.l., 10.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♂ 1♀, NMSL , 8♂ 11♀, ZFMK (Ar 20058–59) and 5♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL125 About ZFMK ), North Central Province, Dimbulagala (7.860°N, 81.118°E), 140 m a.s.l., 11.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 2♀, ZFMK (Ar 20060) and 1♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL133 About ZFMK ), Uva Province, near Gowindahela (7.041°N, 81.538°E), 130–180 m a.s.l., 12.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♂ 2♀, ZFMK (Ar 20061) and 2♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL138 About ZFMK ), Uva Province, near Okkampitiya (6.728°N, 81.336°E), 190 m a.s.l., 13.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♂, ZFMK (Ar 20062) , Central Province, Kandy, Dunumadallawa Forest (7.282°N, 80.643°E), 600–680 m a.s.l., 8.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 3♀, ZFMK (Ar 20063) and 2♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK ( SL151 About ZFMK ), Sabaragamuwa Province, above Dematagala (6.451°N, 80.751°E), 160 m a.s.l., 16.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♀, ZFMK (Ar 20064) , Western Province, above Pelawatta-Tinniyawala road (6.404°N, 80.283°E), 150 m a.s.l., 18.iii.2017 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps . 1♂ 1♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Benj 40) , Uva Province, Badulla District, between Diyaluma Falls and Wellawaya (6.725°N, 81.029°E), 480 m a.s.l., hand collecting, 4.viii.2011 (S.P. Benjamin, S. Batuwita) GoogleMaps .
Natural history. This species consistently had a domed web with the apex connected to the underside of a leaf. Webs were often shared by males and females; in that case, they were larger than usual (i.e. ~ 30 cm diameter) and contacted several leaves (e.g. at Dimbulagala, where most available leaves were rather small, about 6x 3 cm). Some webs were strongly curved, almost globular. Egg-sacs were consistently carried under the prosoma ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 93–102 ; similar to the Southeast Asian genus Cantikus Huber, 2018 , previously the Pholcus halabala species group; Huber et al. 2016b) rather than in front of the prosoma as usual in Pholcidae and in close relatives (cf. Figs 98, 100, 102 View FIGURES 93–102 ).
Distribution. Widely distributed in Sri Lanka ( Fig. 224 View FIGURES 224–225 ).
Eberle, J., Dimitrov, D., Valdez-Mondragon, A. & Huber, B. A. (2018) Microhabitat change drives diversification in pholcid spiders. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 18, 141. https: // doi. org / 10.1186 / s 12862 - 018 - 1244 - 8
Huber, B. A. (2011) Revision and cladistic analysis of Pholcus and closely related taxa (Araneae, Pholcidae). Bonner zoologische Monographien, 58, 1 - 509.
Huber, B. A., Petcharad, B., Leh Moi Ung, C., Koh, J. K. H. & Ghazali, A. R. M. (2016 b) The Southeast Asian Pholcus halabala species group (Araneae, Pholcidae), new data from field observations and ultrastructure. European Journal of Taxonomy, 190, 1 - 55. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2016.190
Huber, B. A., Eberle, J. & Dimitrov, D. (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders (Araneae, Pholcidae): a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data. ZooKeys, 789, 51 - 101. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 789.22781
FIGURES 93–102. Tissahamia, live specimens. 93–96. T. ethagala (Huber, 2011), male from Ethagala, female with egg-sac from Kandalama, and females from Dematagala. 97–98. T. karuna sp. n., male and female with egg-sac from Labugama. 99– 100. T. maturata (Huber, 2011), male with mite and female with egg-sac from Hakgala. 101–102. T. kottawagamaensis (Yao & Li, 2016), male from Kottawa, female from Viharekele.
FIGURES 103–109. 103–106. Tissahamia ethagala (Huber, 2011), female prosomata in dorsal views (both specimens from Dimbulagala, ZFMK Ar 20059) and ventral views (specimens from Dimbulagala and Ethagala, ZFMK Ar 20059 and 20056). 107–109. T. karuna sp. n. (ZFMK Ar 20066), left male palp in prolateral, dorsal, and retrolateral views. Abbreviations: a, ‘appendix’ (main bulbal process); b, genital bulb; c, coxa; e, embolus; f, femur; p, procursus; pbs, proximal bulbal sclerite; ta, tarsus; ti, tibia; tr, trochanter. Scale line (107–109): 0.5 mm (103–106 at various scales).
FIGURES 31–35. 31–33. Belisana gowindahela sp. n. (ZFMK Ar 20007). 31. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 32–33. Left procursus, prolateral and retrolateral views. 34–35. B. ratnapura Huber, 2005 (ZFMK Ar 20015), left procursus, prolateral and retrolateral views (all procursi at same scale). Scale lines: 0.2 mm.
FIGURES 1–9. Belisana, live specimens. 1–3. B. minneriya sp. n., males and female with egg-sac from Minneriya. 4–5. B. keyti Huber, 2005, male and female with egg-sac from Hakgala. 6–7. B. gowindahela sp. n., male from Ethagala, female with egg-sac from Dematagala. 8–9. B. ratnapura Huber, 2005, male from Mapalena Ella, female with egg-sac from Viharekele.
FIGURES 17–24. 17–22. Belisana badulla sp. n. (ZFMK Ar 20002). 17–19. Left procursus, prolateral, dorsal, and retrolateral views. 20–21. Male chelicerae, frontal and lateral views. 22. Left genital bulb, prolateral view. 23–24. B. keyti Huber, 2005 (ZFMK Ar 20004) and B. benjamini Huber, 2005 (ZFMK Ar 20005), left genital bulbs, prolateral views (all genital bulbs at same scale). Abbreviations: ba, bulbal apophysis; e, embolus. Scale lines: 0.2 mm.
FIGURES 10–16. Belisana minneriya sp. n. (ZFMK Ar 20000). 10–11. Left male palp, prolateral and retrolateral views. 12. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 13–14. Left procursus, prolateral and retrolateral views. 15. Epigynum, ventral view. 16. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view. Abbreviations: b, genital bulb; ba, bulbal apophysis; c, coxa; ds, dorsal sclerite; e, embolus; f, femur; p, procursus; pbs, proximal bulbal sclerite; rf, retrolateral flap; ta, tarsus; ti, tibia; tr, trochanter. Scale lines: 0.2 mm (10– 12, 15–16), 0.1 mm (13–14).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tissahamia ethagala ( Huber, 2011 )
Huber, Bernhard A. 2019 |
Pholcus ethagala
Huber, B. A. 2011: 174 |
1 (by plazi, 2019-04-03 07:01:19)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-03 11:32:59)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-04 15:40:37)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-25 23:02:57)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-09 10:48:14)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-18 08:13:40)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-19 07:57:10)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-19 18:37:59)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-10-20 05:46:42)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-03-04 16:24:02)
11 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-03-04 16:47:02)
12 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-29 13:06:19)
13 (by GgImagineBatch, 2022-04-30 04:50:54)
14 (by plazi, 2023-10-30 12:51:54)
15 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-10-31 01:47:33)