Sternaspis sherlockae, Salazar-Vallejo, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2017.56-32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B2187E0-1F16-6657-FF62-23A0BFFF2848 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sternaspis sherlockae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sternaspis sherlockae View in CoL sp. nov.
( Fig. 6 View Fig )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:70BF765A-F219-4A81-8EA5-D3FD3DF860EC
Sternaspis scutata View in CoL : Day 1967: 648, Fig. 31.I.a-d (non Ranzani, 1817).
Type material: Red Sea. Holotype ( BMNH 2013.410 ) and paratype ( BMNH 2013.411 ), Crossland Red Sea Expedition, 19 Jan. 1904 (paratype 19 mm long, 7 mm wide, abdomen 12 mm long, left shield plate 3 mm long, 3 mm wide).
Additional material: Red Sea. Two specimens ( BMNH 1869.6.30.3), Gulf of Suez, R. McAndrew, coll. (smaller specimen with introvert invaginated, 8 mm long, 4.7 mm wide, left shield plate 1.1 mm long, 1.5 mm wide; larger specimen with introvert exposed 17 mm long, 6 mm wide, abdomen 10.7 mm long, left shield plate 2.5 mm long, 2 mm wide; both specimens with genital papillae whitish, thick, tapered).
Description: Holotype ( BMNH 2013.410) complete, whitish, introvert grayish, swollen, shield reddish, banded, integument rugose, papillae mostly eroded ( Fig. 6A View Fig ). Body 16 mm long, 4 mm wide, abdomen 11 mm long, left shield plate 2.5 mm long, 2.4 mm wide.
Prostomium small, opaque, without eyespots ( Figs. 6B, D View Fig ). Peristomium rounded, slightly depressed below mouth, with small papillae extended ventrally, not extetended laterally or over the prostomial lobe. Mouth circular, completely covered with minute papillae.
First three chaetigers with 10-12 hooks, broken, slightly falcate. Genital papillae not visible in type specimens (whitish, short, tapered lobes in additional materials). Pre-shield region with 7 segments, without fascicles of capillary chaetae.
Shield with ribs and concentric lines, reddish, banded, suture extended through ⅔ of shield length, posteriorly indistinct ( Fig. 6C View Fig ). Anterior margins angular; anterior depression deep; anterior keels visible, but not exposed (exposed in paratype). Lateral margins medially expanded, reduced posteriorly. Fan truncate, not extended beyond posterior corners; barely crenulate; without median or lateral notches.
Marginal chaetal fascicles include 10 lateral ones, chaetae ovally arranged, and seven posterior fascicles, chaetae in a slightly curved arrangement. Peg chaetae not seen, probably broken.
Branchiae abundant, helicoidal, yellowish. Interbranchial filaments shorter, thinner, grayish. Branchial plates (observed in non-type specimen) oval, slightly divergent, truncate, rounded anteriorly ( Fig. 6G View Fig ).
Variation: The paratype is larger than the holotype; its introvert has 12-14 hooks, its shield has two small, lateral notches and its anterior keels are visible ( Fig. 6E View Fig ). Smaller specimens have shields with suture visible throughout shield, but soon the lateral plates fuse posteriorly and the suture is not visible ( Figs. 6F, H View Fig ).
Etymology: This species name is a modest homage to Emma Sherlock ( BMNH) in recognition of her kind support to all of my research activities. The epithet is a noun in the genitive case.
Remarks: Sternaspis sherlockae sp. nov. resembles S. thorsoni Sendall & Salazar-Vallejo, 2013 , another species from the Indian Ocean, because both have reddish, banded shields with deep anterior depressions and truncate posterior margins. However, they differ because in S. sherlockae the posterior corners are rounded, not projected, whereas in S. thorsoni they are projected posteriorly as rounded lobes. Another perhaps more relevant difference is the number of introvert hooks; in S. sherlockae there are 12- 14 hooks in 16 mm long specimens (holotype), whereas in S. thorsoni there are 16-20 hooks in 14 mm long specimens (holotype).
On the other hand, as indicated in the key below, S. sherlockae resembles S. spinosa from Indonesia, because both have shields with anterior margins acute and the posterior corners are not projected. These two species differ because the shield in S. sherlockae shield plates are longer than wide, and its anterior keels are divergent, and the branchial plates are parallel, whereas in S. spinosa the shield plates are wider than long, its anterior keels are parallel, and the branchial plates are divergent.
The record by Day (1967) of S. scutata resembles the holotype of S. sherlockae by having shield with alternating pale and brown bands, a wide deep anterior furrow, a fan with posterior margin crenulate, with a shallow median notch, and without projecting posterior corners. If they are conspecific, the species would extend along the Western Indian Ocean margin, from the Red Sea to South Africa, but this distribution needs confirmation based upon additional specimens.
Distribution: Red Sea, presumably in shallow water.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sternaspis sherlockae
Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2017 |
Sternaspis scutata
Day JH 1967: 648 |