Stellaria filicaulis Makino, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo). 15: 113 (1901)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.170.59527 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/71F7952E-ADCA-5025-A7A4-5AE1C2811C3D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Stellaria filicaulis Makino, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo). 15: 113 (1901) |
status |
|
Stellaria filicaulis Makino, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo). 15: 113 (1901) View in CoL
Lectotype
(designated here):- Japan, Tokyo , Koiwa-mura, June 16, 1895, Watanabe s.n. ( TNS62378 digital image!, Figure 4 View Figure 4 ; Isolectotypes: Japan, Musashi Prov., Koiwa-mura, Yoda , Makino s.n., MAK barcode MAK009391 digital images! , Japan, Hitachi Prov., Itako , Suzuki s.n., MAK barcode MAK009392 digital images! , Japan, Musashi Prov., Koiwa-mura, Yoda , Watanabe s.n., MAK barcode MAK010156 digital image! ).
Note.
Makino first described S. filicaulis without designating a specimen as holotype but mentioned four specimens " Watanabe s.n., June 16, 1895; Makino s.n., June 23, 1895; Watanabe s.n., June 16, 1895; Suzuki s.n., May 19, 1901" in the protologue. Yet following Arts. 9.6 and 40 Note 1 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018), these specimens should be treated as syntypes. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1981 and 1988), the original specimens were traced in GH, TI and MAK, but no specimens could be found in GH and TI mentioned in the protologue. Tropicos ( Tropicos 2020) cited "Type-Protologue: K. Watanabe s.n. in TI", but related specimens were not found in TI. Fortunately, original specimens in TNS (TNS62378 digital image!) and MAK (MAK009391-MAK009392 digital images!, MAK010156 digital image!) were traced, with a description of the collecting location and date agreeing with the protologue. They could be confirmed as original specimens. Moreover, Makino might have described S. filicaulis based on one of these specimens because it has a label containing a message which means a new name. Hence, TNS62378 is designated here as the lectotype for its good preservation, the numerous flowers and fruits, and also greatly agreeing with the protologue according to Art. 9.3 and 9.4 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |