Omorgus (Afromorgus) chinensis ( Boheman, 1858 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5437.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DC87F27D-C28A-4904-805F-FBE91DDC10DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10961439 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E67787E1-D913-CC13-D7D9-FD85779D5848 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Omorgus (Afromorgus) chinensis ( Boheman, 1858 ) |
status |
|
Omorgus (Afromorgus) chinensis ( Boheman, 1858) View in CoL
( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 6–7 )
Trox chinensis Boheman, 1858: 52 View in CoL (original description).
Trox chinensis View in CoL : Harold 1872: 104 (redescription); Lewis 1895: 386 (specimens of Japan); Arrow 1912: 54 (catalogue); Balthasar 1936: 438 (diagnosis); Haaf 1954: 387 (diagnosis, illustration, key).
Trox (Omorgus) chinensis View in CoL : Scholtz 1982: 9 (catalogue).
Omorgus (Afromorgus) chinensis View in CoL : Zidek 2013: 8, 20 (checklist); Zidek 2017: 13, 112 (checklist).
Afromorgus chinensis View in CoL : Pittino 2006: 79 (new combination, catalogue); Pittino & Bezdĕk 2016: 53 (catalogue); Singh et al. 2023: 370–373 (DNA-barcoding, biology, forensic entomology).
Omorgus chinensis View in CoL : Ying 2019 (mitogenome, GenBank: MK937809.1); Yu et al. 2022: 70–72 (mitogenome).
Trox obscurus Waterhouse, 1875: 98 View in CoL (original description). Type locality: “ Hong Kong ”. Type depository: Holotype (male) at NHMUK ( Figs. 8–11 View FIGURES 8–11 ). Synonymised by Arrow 1927: 466.
Trox obscurus View in CoL : Nakane & Tsukamoto 1955: 87 (specimens of Japan, key); Kim 2012: 4, 20 (specimens of Korea, treated as a valid species: Omorgus obscurus View in CoL ).
Type depository. Syntype (male) at NHRS ( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 6–7 ) .
Type locality. “ China (Hong Kong)” .
Distribution. Cambodia, China (including Taiwan), Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Japan, Vietnam ( Masumoto et al. 2005; Kim 2012; Pittino & Bezdĕk 2016; Schoolmeesters 2023).
NHRS |
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Collections |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Omorgus (Afromorgus) chinensis ( Boheman, 1858 )
Kalawate, Aparna S. & Strümpher, Werner P. 2024 |
Yu, H. & Chen, Y. - J. & Ying, Y. & Yuan, J. - J. 2022: 70 |
Omorgus
Zidek, J. 2017: 13 |
Zidek, J. 2013: 8 |
Afromorgus chinensis
Singh, S. & Yong, S. K. & Rahimi, R. & Singh, M. K. C. & Low, V. L. & Pittino, R. & Heo, C. C. 2023: 370 |
Pittino, R. & Bezdek, A. 2016: 53 |
Pittino, R. 2006: 79 |
Trox (Omorgus) chinensis
Scholtz, C. H. 1982: 9 |
Trox obscurus
Nakane, T. & Tsukamoto, K. 1955: 87 |
Trox obscurus
Arrow, G. J. 1927: 466 |
Waterhouse, C. O. 1875: 98 |
Trox chinensis
Haaf, E. 1954: 387 |
Balthasar, V. 1936: 438 |
Arrow, G. J. 1912: 54 |
Lewis, G. 1895: 386 |
Harold, E. 1872: 104 |
Trox chinensis
Boheman, C. H. 1858: 52 |