Neoroussoella chromolaenae Z. H. Htet, A. Mapook & K. D. Hyde, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.111.136922 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14510044 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4EF5EA92-5E50-5E22-8BE2-AA307EF9C9C8 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Neoroussoella chromolaenae Z. H. Htet, A. Mapook & K. D. Hyde |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neoroussoella chromolaenae Z. H. Htet, A. Mapook & K. D. Hyde sp. nov.
Fig. 2 View Figure 2
Etymology.
Name reflects the host plant Chromolaena odorata , from which this species was isolated.
Holotype.
MFLU 24-0264 .
Description.
Saprobic on the dead stems of Chromolaena odorata ( Asteraceae ). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata 70–150 × 120–150 µm (av. 85 × 138 µm, n = 5), pycnidial, solitary, uniloculate, immersed, ostiolate. Ostiole papillate. Peridium 10–20 µm wide, comprising 2–3 layers of brown cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3–5 × 2–3.5 µm (av. 3 × 3 µm, n = 10), phialidic, ampulliform to cylindrical, hyaline. Conidia 3–6 × 2–4 μm (av. 4.4 × 3.1 μm, n = 20), hyaline, oblong to slightly ellipsoid, aseptate, with small guttules.
Culture characteristics.
Conidia germinating on MEA within 24 hours, reaching 22 mm after 10 days at 27 ° C, irregular, curled margin, brown in the middle and becoming pale brown on the outer parts of the culture, wrinkled on the surface; wrinkle, pale brown to brown in reverse.
Material examined.
Thailand • Chiang Rai Province, Doi Pui , 19°48'51"N, 99°52'1"E, on dead stems of Chromolaena odorata ( Asteraceae ), 14 March 2023, Zin Hnin Htet (CO-DP-3, MFLU 24-0264 , holotype); ex-type culture MFLUCC 24-0274 GoogleMaps .
Notes.
In a megablast search of GenBank, the closest match for the ITS sequence of our isolate was fungal sp. isolate NFC- 3 (MG 189955) with 99.47 % similarity. The closest match for the LSU region was N. solani CBS 141288 ( MH 878207 View Materials ) with 100 % similarity, and the closest match for the SSU region was N. bambusae strain GMB 1295 ( OM 764650 View Materials ) with 93.99 % similarity. Additionally, the closet matches for the tef 1 - α and rpb 2 gene regions were Neoroussoella entadae strain MFLUCC 18-0243 ( MK 360065 View Materials ) and N. entadae strain MFLUCC 17-0920 ( MK 434898 View Materials ) with 99.45 % and 99.77 % similarities, respectively.
Based on the multi-locus phylogeny (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), our isolate ( MFLUCC 24-0274 ) formed a separate branch from N. entadae with 100 % ML and 1.00 BYPP. A comparative analysis of base pair differences between Neoroussoella chromolaenae ( MFLUCC 24-0274 ) and Neoroussoella entadae ( MFLUCC 18-0243 ) revealed variations in ITS (0.6 % - 3 / 476), LSU (0.1 % - 1 / 838), SSU (1.9 % - 14 / 717), tef 1 - α (0.5 % - 5 / 902), and rpb 2 (2.0 % - 18 / 885) without gaps, respectively. Morphologically, our collection is similar to N. entadae ( MFLUCC 17–0920 ) in having solitary, unilocular, ostiolate, phialidic, ampulliform to cylindrical, hyaline conidiogenous cells, and oblong to ellipsoidal, hyaline conidia ( Jayasiri et al. 2019). However, our species differs from N. entadae ( MFLUCC 17–0920 ) in having smaller conidiomata (70–150 × 120–150 µm vs. 127–192 × 161–190 µm), slightly wider conidiogenous cells (2–3.5 µm vs. 0.7–1.8 µm) and larger conidia size (3–6 × 2–4 μm vs. 3–4 × 1.7–1.9 μm). Therefore, N. chromolaenae is described here as a new species based on phylogeny and morphological evidence. Synopsis of the asexual morph of Neoroussoella species is also provided in Table 3 View Table 3 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |