Leucogeorgia turbanovi, Antić & Reip, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.713 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6CB58F5-1ECC-47F0-AA07-798844AF80A7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4335810 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/75EECC8C-DAAB-49F7-B6EF-BEAD1FCE546F |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:75EECC8C-DAAB-49F7-B6EF-BEAD1FCE546F |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Leucogeorgia turbanovi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leucogeorgia turbanovi View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:75EECC8C-DAAB-49F7-B6EF-BEAD1FCE546F
Figs 1G View Fig , 47–49 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 56–57 View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
This species belongs to the group of Leucogeorgia spp. with modified mouthparts and teeth on the mesomeral claw (vs teeth absent in L. longipes ). Leucogeorgia turbanovi sp. nov. differs from L. rediviva , L. redivivoides sp. nov. and L. caudata sp. nov. by having a mesomeral claw that continues directly with the margin of the lamella, both being fully coalesced (vs mesomeral claw and lamella being clearly connected mesally in L. rediviva , L. redivivoides sp. nov. and L. caudata sp. nov.). Leucogeorgia turbanovi sp. nov. differs from L. mystax sp. nov. by the absence of highly modified mouthparts, viz., two rounded labral lobes with a deep incision in between and a unique gnathochilarium with a distolateral bundle of long setae on the stipites and distal rows of long setae on both stipites and lamellae linguales (vs presence of such structures in L. mystax sp. nov.). Leucogeorgia turbanovi sp. nov. differs from L. profunda sp. nov. by having a stout mesomeral claw (vs slender in L. profunda sp. nov.), longer antennae with a length of 170% of the vertical diameter of the largest body ring (vs shorter antennae with a length of 160% of the vertical diameter of the largest body ring in L. profunda sp. nov.) and a subrhomboid hypoproct (vs hypoproct posterior margin with a characteristic rounded extension in L. profunda sp. nov.).
Etymology
This new species is dedicated to Ilya Turbanov, a well-known Russian biospeleologist, the collector of some specimens of this species. Noun in the genitive case.
Material examined
Holotype
RUSSIA – Krasnodar Province • ♂; Greater Sochi , Alek-Dzykhrinsky karst Massif , Dzykhra Mt , Pechalnaya Cave ; 43.57° N, 40.07° E; 825 m a.s.l.; 3 Oct. 1985; N. Mugue leg.; ZMUM.
GoogleMapsParatypes
RUSSIA – Krasnodar Province • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀, 4 juvs; same collection data as for holotype; ZMUM GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; IZB GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; SMNG GoogleMaps .
Other material
ABKHAZIA – Gagry District • 1 ♂; Arabika karst Massif , Gagra Mt Ridge , Ortobalagan Valley , Krubera (= Krubera-Voronya) Cave , - 100 m deep; 43.41° N, 40.31° E; 2256 m a.s.l.; 29 Aug. 2015; I.S. Turbanov leg.; ZMUM GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Arabika karst Massif , Gagra Mt Ridge , Pozharnaya Cave , - 120 m deep; 43.42° N, 40.33° E; 2187 m a.s.l.; 15 Aug. 2015; F.L. Tsherednitshenko leg.; ZMUM GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Arabika karst Massif , Orlinoye Gnezdo Cave , - 30 m deep; 43.38° N, 40.38° E; 2205 m a.s.l.; 27 Aug. 2012; E. Golubnichaya leg.; ZMUM GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Arabika karst Massif , Lastochkino Krylo area , Nytshka Cave , - 7 m deep; 43.45° N, 40.31° E; 2157 m a.s.l.; 27 Aug. 2014; I.S. Turbanov leg.; ZMUM GoogleMaps .
Description
SIZE AND NUMBER OF BODY RINGS. Holotype male 18 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.35 mm, body with 29 podous rings + 2 apodous rings + telson. Paratype males 19–24 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.35–1.6 mm, body with 32–36 podous rings + 0–1 apodous ring + telson. Paratype females 21–28 mm long, vertical diameter of largest body ring 1.7–2 mm, body with 33–40 podous rings + 0–1 apodous ring + telson.
COLOUR ( Figs 1G View Fig , 47 View Fig ). Living animal with whitish head, legs and telson; due to thin and transparent cuticle, body looks blackish, with some greyish or blackish patterns. Yellowish white to yellowishbrown in alcohol.
HEAD ( Figs 47B, E View Fig , 48 View Fig C–E). Without ommatidia. Frontal setae absent. Labrum without labral teeth, with 4 supralabral setae (one paratype male with 5) and 29–35 labral setae. Gnathochilarium with a triangular promentum; lamellae linguales with 1+1 long distal and 4+4 long proximal setae; stipites with 3+3 long distolateral setae; no other setae. Antennae 2.3 mm long in holotype male, their length ca 170% of vertical diameter of largest body ring. Lengths of antennomeres I–VIII (in mm): 0.1 (I), 0.35 (II), 0.54 (III), 0.48 (IV), 0.57 (V), 0.22 (VI), 0.1 (VII) and 0.04 (VIII). Length/width ratio of antennomeres I–VII: 0.8 (I), 2 (II), 3.4 (III), 3 (IV), 2.8 (V), 1.2 (VI) and 0.8 (VII). Antennomeres V and VI each with a terminal corolla of large sensilla basiconica bacilliformia; antennomere VII with a terminal corolla of small sensilla basiconica bacilliformia.
BODY RINGS ( Fig. 47H View Fig ). Ventral and ventrolateral sides of metazonal area with longitudinal striations. Dorsal side with poorly visible striations. Length of midbody setae ca 6% of vertical diameter of rings.
TELSON ( Fig. 47 View Fig C–D). Epiproct with a short, acuminate and triangular process covered with dorsal and lateral setae. Paraprocts rounded, densely setose. Hypoproct subrhomboid, covered with ca seven long setae in paratype male.
LEGS IN MALES. First pair of legs modified, hook-shaped ( Figs 48 View Fig A–B, 49C), with three podomeres; coxa with one seta; prefemur with 4–6 setae; femora, postfemora and tibiotarsi coalesced; femur with 2–3 setae; postfemur with one seta. Tibiotarsal part with a small distal lobe. Tip slightly tuberculate. Postfemoral and tibial ventral pads poorly developed on pregonopodal legs, then gradually disappearing on postgonopodal legs.
VENTRAL MARGIN OF MALE BODY RING 7 ( Fig. 47F View Fig ). Poorly developed, low, rounded in lateral view.
PENES ( Fig. 49D View Fig ). Elongate, apically with two long subtriangular lobes.
GONOPODS ( Figs 48F View Fig , 49 View Fig A–B). Promere (p) long and slender, slightly curved anteriad, with a flagellum (f); apical part spatulate, with denticulate margins; basal half with two developed ridges. Mesomere (m) with a robust and denticulate mesomeral claw (mc); mesomeral lamella (ml) slightly convex, distal margin serrate, posterior margin finely fimbriate. Opisthomere (o) bipartite. Anterior branch of o with a solenomere (s) with a short tip, and a well-developed and fimbriate velum (v). Posterior branch of o in form of a shield-like protective lamella (pl). Mesomere and opisthomere connected basally with an accessory membrane (am).
Distribution
Known from several caves in the Alek-Dzykhrinsky and Arabika karst massifs ( Fig. 57 View Fig , black square). The occurrence of this species in some of these caves has previously been recorded by Sidorov et al. (2014), Turbanov (2015) and Turbanov et al. (2018).
Remarks
This new species occurs sympatrically or even syntopically with two other species of Leucogeorgia with modified mouthparts. In the Krubera Cave, it lives sympatrically with L. profunda sp. nov. (see above), while in the Nytshka Cave it is syntopic with L. mystax sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Oncoiulinae |
Tribe |
Leucogeorgiini |
Genus |