Labyrinthomyxidae Cavalier-Smith, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4467/16890027AP.12.023.0783 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/915087B1-D641-1E72-C0F4-FCB9FD63F902 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Labyrinthomyxidae Cavalier-Smith |
status |
fam. nov. |
Labyrinthomyxidae Cavalier-Smith fam. n.
Diagnosis: Filoplasmodial heterotrophs whose spindle-shaped cells with bipolar projections form linear, branching, anastomosing rows and parasitize solenocysts of the brown alga Laminaria ; with uninucleate amoeba or uniciliate phases; cyst or theca unknown. Type genus Labyrinthomyxa ( Dubosq 1921) .
Another protist with similarities to labyrinthulids is Chlamydomyxa labyrinthuloides ( Archer 1875) , but its taxonomy is confused by probable later misidentifications. Unless Archer conflated multiple organisms, we support his interpretation of the original Chlamydomyxa labyrinthuloides as probably a labyrinthulid (distinct enough to merit its own family), unlike subsequent authors who questioned that or described other probably unrelated ‘ Chlamydomyxa ’ species ( Geddes 1882, Hieronymus 1898, Lankester 1896, Pascher 1930, Pearlmutter and Tumpano 1984, Penard 1904) – clonal cultures more similar to those of Archer are needed to check this. In particular we consider the non-reticulose, filose amoeboid heterokont alga identified as Chlamydomyxa labyrinthuloides by Wenderoth et al. (1999), whose 18S rDNA places it in Picophagea within the phylum Ochrophyta ( Cavalier-Smith and Chao 2006), was misidentified and is really a new species in an undescribed genus – to be established elsewhere.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.