Epitarsipus rufithorax Le Cerf, 1922
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4433.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB01DC36-A123-41C3-B870-C73DD35BF6C2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5953575 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/847D3258-EB77-181D-62AD-FE77FE95BC13 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epitarsipus rufithorax Le Cerf, 1922 |
status |
|
Epitarsipus rufithorax Le Cerf, 1922 View in CoL comb. rev.
Figs 17–19 View FIGURES 13–24
Lectotype: ♀, Madagascar, Brickaville [Ampasimanolotra], 1917 ( MNHN).
Additional material examined: 1♂, 1♀, Madagascar, Reg. sud de l'Ile, Bekily, Sept. [19]33 ( MNHN) ; 1♀, S/W Madagascar, 27km N Tollara , 7m, dry forest near Ifaty, 9.- 13.11.2003, leg. Oelke ( SMNS) .
Epitarsipus rufithorax View in CoL was described on the basis of a male and a female from Brickaville [Ampasimanolotra] ( Le Cerf 1922). Viette (1982) designated the male as the lectotype and the female as a paralectotype. He concluded that the female, which is considerably different, belonged to another species, M. biedermanni View in CoL (see M. rufescens View in CoL below). This conclusion was based on the examination of a short series of both sexes of E. rufithorax View in CoL from “Reg. sud de l'Ile, Bekily” collected in Sept. 1933, which clearly showed that there is no relevant dimorphism between the sexes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Epitarsipus rufithorax Le Cerf, 1922
Bartsch, Daniel 2018 |
M. biedermanni
Viette 1982 |
Epitarsipus rufithorax
Le Cerf 1922 |
M. rufescens
Le Cerf 1922 |
E. rufithorax
Le Cerf 1922 |