Brevistoma bardii ( Navás, 1914 )

Zheng, Yuchen, Ni, Ziyang, Aspöck, Ulrike, Aspöck, Horst, Badano, Davide, Nel, André & Liu, Xingyue, 2025, A hidden treasure along Silk Roads: An unexpected new species of spoon-winged lacewings from Xinjiang, China, and a revision of the genus Brevistoma Tjeder, 1967 (Neuroptera: Nemopteridae), Zootaxa 5566 (1), pp. 97-118 : 99-101

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5566.1.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0BB43625-F628-4D0F-A98E-52E2337F14D6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14618910

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/142487C9-8038-E626-FF35-DC884507FDBE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Brevistoma bardii ( Navás, 1914 )
status

 

Brevistoma bardii ( Navás, 1914) View in CoL

( Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 ; 2A–B, D–E View FIGURE 2 ; 4 View FIGURE 4 ; 11A–B View FIGURE 11 ; 12 View FIGURE 12 )

Lertha bardii Navás, 1914: 202 View in CoL (type locality: “Hon, Oasi di Giofra” = Lybia: Al Kufrah, Hon town; holotype originally in MSNG, loaned but not returned). Monserrat, 1988: 105 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Poggi, 1993: 440 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Aspöck & Hölzel, 1996: 65 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Güsten, 2003: 136 ( Brevistoma View in CoL ). Prost, 2016: 410 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Ábrahám, 2017: 79 ( Brevistoma View in CoL ).

Lertha dumonti Navás, 1924: 111 View in CoL (type locality: Algeria, Laghouat; two syntypes in MNHN, one of them lost). Navás, 1929: 15 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Monserrat, 1985: 242 ( Lertha View in CoL ). Synonymised by Monserrat, 1988: 105.

Diagnosis. Vertex barely raised. Male antenna nearly 2/3 length of forewing; female antenna nearly half as long as forewing. Maxillary palpus columniform. Pronotum with a pair of indistinct brown stripes. Mesoprescutum brown anteriorly; mesonotum laterally with a pair of indistinct brown stripes; mesoscutellum pale yellow without marking. Forewing generally hyaline. Hind wing mostly hyaline, distal part of hind wing with two brown markings. Abdomen laterally with a pair of dark brown stripes. Male posterior gonocoxites 9 widely hook-like, dorsal protruded in lateral view; gonostyli 11 slightly swollen, gonocoxites + gonostyli 11 nearly W-shaped in dorsal view.

Re-description. Size. Head width 2.02–2.56 mm; forewing length 18.24–22.46 mm; hind wing length 46.76– 50.22 mm.

Head. Vertex barely raised, pale brown without marking. Male antenna nearly 2/3 length of forewing; female antenna nearly half as long as forewing. Scape and pedicel pale yellow. Each flagellomere nearly as long as wide in male ( Figs 11A, 11C–E, 11G View FIGURE 11 ), but longer than wide in female ( Figs 11B, 11F, 11H–I View FIGURE 11 ). Frons pale yellow, female frons nearly as long as wide. Female clypeus as long as wide. Labrum truncated on distal margin. Maxillary palpus columniform. Labial palpus slender. Cardo and stipe pale yellow. Mandibles pale yellow, elongate. Rostrum nearly as long as half of head width ( Figs 4E–G View FIGURE 4 ).

Thorax. Mostly pale yellow. Pronotum pale yellow, with a pair of indistinct brown stripes, covered with some short pale setae. Mesoprescutum brown anteriorly; mesonotum laterally with a pair of indistinct brown stripes; mesoscutellum pale yellow without marking. Metanotum extremely short. Meso- and metapleurae generally pale yellow ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ).

Legs. Slender, generally pale yellow. Tibial spur weakly developed. Tarsomeres 2–4 with some stout setae ventrally; pretarsal claws dark reddish brown, slightly curved ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ).

Wings. Forewing generally hyaline, apex rounded; subcostal area and pterostigma pale yellow; costal crossvein not forked; 11 presectoral crossveins present; RP with five branches; 3A closed to forewing margin. Hind wing slender, ribbon-like, nearly twice as long as forewing, mostly hyaline; distal part of hind wing with two dark brown markings; pterostigma pale ( Figs 3A, B, D, E View FIGURE 3 ; 4A–C View FIGURE 4 ).

Abdomen. Pale yellow, laterally with a pair of dark brown stripes. Male genitalia. Sternum 9 nearly twice as long as ectoproct (ect), rectangular in ventral view, medial margin slightly prominent ( Figs 4H–I View FIGURE 4 ). Posterior gonocoxites 9 widely hook-like, dorsally protruded in lateral view; gonocoxites 11 thick arched, medially with some short setae; gonostyli 11 slightly swollen, gonocoxites + gonostyli 11 nearly W-shaped in dorsal view ( Figs 4L–P View FIGURE 4 ). Ectoproct rounded in lateral view ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ). Female genitalia. Gonocoxites 9 long ovoid, covered with some short setae. Ectoproct rounded on distal margin, covered with some short setae ( Figs 1D View FIGURE 1 ; 7J–K View FIGURE 7 ).

Type material examined. 1♀, syntype of Lertha dumonti Navás, 1924 , “ Algérie, Laghouat, 20.7.19, C. Dumont, 1924” = ALGERIA: Laghouat ( MNHN) ( Fig. 1 A View FIGURE 1 ) .

Additional material examined. 1♂, ALGERIA: Ghardaia ( MNHN) ; 1♂ 6♀, MAURITANIA: Atar , 5.IV.1967, collections of André Prost ( MDC) ; 1♂ 1♀, MOROCCO: Ouarzazate, N12, Zagora , 720 m, 9.V.2024, D. Sechi ( DB) ; 8♀, MOROCCO: Errachidia, Aoufous ( Ose am Oued Ziz , S Kar-ej-Jdid ), 31.40N / 4.10W, 1100 m, 22.VII.1982, Horst Aspöck, Ulrike Aspöck, Christoph Aspöck, H. Rausch & R. Rausch ( HUAC) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, TUNISIA: “Tunisian desert” ( ZCAU) .

Distribution. Algeria (Ghardaia, Laghouat); Libya (Al Kufrah, Tripoli); Mauritania (Atar); Morocco (Draa-Tafilalet, Errachidia, Ouarzazate); Tunisia.

Remarks. This species was originally described by Navás (1914) based on a single specimen (the holotype) from Libya, as a member of the genus Lertha , i.e., L. bardii . Monserrat (1988) treated L. dumonti as a junior synonym of this species. Güsten (2003) transferred L. bardii to the genus Brevistoma , as a new combination, i.e., B. bardii , while also treating the type species of Brevistoma ( B. bourboni ) as another junior synonym of the former species. Lertha is a distinct genus, being characterized by the presence of some setae around the eye, the distal hindwing with distinct double dilations, the male gonostyli 11 not swollen into lingulate processes, and the absence of sexual dimorphism in the antennae and mouthparts ( Aspöck et al. 1984; Monserrat 1985). Thus, B. bardii fits the modern taxonomic concept of Brevistoma and therefore belongs to this genus. Unfortunately, we were unable to examine the holotype of L. bardii . According to the information provided by the MSNG staff, the type was not returned since it was borrowed in the turn of this century. However, we can still clarify the taxonomic status of this species based on the literature ( Monserrat 1988) and additional non-type specimens examined. Based on the examination of a syntype of L. dumonti ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ), we found that its characters match the descriptions of B. bardii provided by Navás (1914) and Monserrat (1988). Besides, since the type locality of L. dumonti and B. bardii are close, we agree with that L. dumonti is a junior synonym of B. bardii as proposed by Monserrat (1988).

MNHN

France, Paris, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Neuroptera

Family

Nemopteridae

SubFamily

Nemopterinae

Genus

Brevistoma

Loc

Brevistoma bardii ( Navás, 1914 )

Zheng, Yuchen, Ni, Ziyang, Aspöck, Ulrike, Aspöck, Horst, Badano, Davide, Nel, André & Liu, Xingyue 2025
2025
Loc

Lertha dumonti Navás, 1924: 111

Monserrat, V. J. 1988: 105
Monserrat, V. J. 1985: 242
Navas, L. 1929: 15
Navas, L. 1924: 111
1924
Loc

Lertha bardii Navás, 1914: 202

Abraham, L. 2017: 79
Prost, A. 2016: 410
Gusten, R. 2003: 136
Aspock, H. & Holzel, H. 1996: 65
Poggi, R. 1993: 440
Monserrat, V. J. 1988: 105
Navas, L. 1914: 202
1914
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF