Bitis harenna, Gower, David J., Wade, Edward O. Z., Spawls, Stephen, Böhme, Wolfgang, Buechley, Evan R., Sykes, Daniel & Colston, Timothy J., 2016
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4093.1.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14DE413C-CCAE-4F43-87FE-BF359FD1BC23 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5620605 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/75616821-FF87-FF99-FF1F-DF99FA5FF9A4 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Bitis harenna |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Bitis harenna sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–7 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 , 12 View FIGURE 12 ; Tables 1–2 View TABLE 1 View TABLE 2 ; Appendices 1–2)
Bitis parviocula Böhme, 1977 : Largen & Rasmussen (1993: 383–385, in part); Spawls & Branch (1995: 120–121, in part); Largen & Spawls (2010: 615, in part); Wallach et al. (2014: 92, in part); Wittenberg et al. (2015, in part)
undescribed species of Bitis: Böhme (1990: 12–13, fig. 4)
Holotype. ZMUC R68255 ( Figs. 1–6 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 ), Dodola (from maps: 6.98° N, 39.18° E c. 2,400 m elevation), Oromia Region, Ethiopia; deposited by Sven Joergen Birket-Smith (1920–1983); preserved in ethanol; female. The exact date of collection is unknown, but was possibly 1966 or 1967, when Birket-Smith was in charge of the Addis Ababa Natural History Museum (M.J. Largen, pers. comm.).
Diagnosis. A Bitis of the subgenus Macrocerastes (sensu Lenk et al. 1999) that differs from all other species except B. parviocula in lacking horns between the nostrils, in having less than four scales between the rostral and first supralabial, and in having a pale cross bar on the dorsal surface of the head behind the eyes ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Differs from all other species of the subgenus Macrocerastes (including B. parviocula ) in having a concavity on the lateral wall of the braincase for the origin of the M. retractor pterygoidei that is limited posteriorly by flange on the parietal, rather than extending onto the prootic (see Groombridge 1980; Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 /4); in being mostly blackish dorsally with narrow pale (cream to yellowish) markings ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); in lacking a regular, parallel-sided mid-dorsal stripe (and a series of dark, approximately semicircular markings immediately lateral to this stripe; Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , 6 View FIGURE 6 ); and in having a black middorsal marking on the head that extends anteriorly to between the nostrils ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Among species of the subgenus Macrocerastes, the new species differs also from B. rhinoceros and B. gabonica in having a mostly dark rather than pale dorsal surface of the head. Unlike B. nasicornis , the new species lacks posteriorly notched scales. Unlike B. parviocula , the new species has facets on the frontals for articulation with the prefrontals that do not meet medially ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), and it also lacks a subhorizontal ridge on the lateral surface of the prootic overhanging the foramen for the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). See Remarks section for additional possible differences between the new species and its most similar congener, B. parviocula .
Description of holotype. Some morphometric and meristic data presented in Tables 1 View TABLE 1 and 2 View TABLE 2 and Appendix 2. Condition generally good, some scales rucked and/or abraded; specimen somewhat macerated in parts; 90 mm long approximately midventral incision extending back from approximately 150 mm behind snout tip, with approximately 10 mm 2 midventral section of body wall excised; outer layer of many scales lost. A large, relatively slender Bitis . Widest point slightly anterior to midbody; body tapers gently over anterior one-third of SVL, much more abruptly over posteriormost one-eighth of SVL. Tail short, very slender.
Head posteriorly much wider than anteriormost end of body (‘neck’). Distance between snout tip and posterior end of retroarticular process 43.7 mm (longitudinal distance between level of these two points 42.5 mm). Eyes surrounded by 12,15 circumorbital scales; separated from supralabials by 2 to 3 scales; pupil vertically eliptical. Left and right circumorbital series separated by at least 10 interorbital scales. Nostrils broadly oval (anteroventrally-posterodorsally oriented). Supranasal shields overhang nasals substantially, separated middorsally minimally by 2 scales, separated from circumorbitals minimally by 2 scales. Nasals and supranasals separated from rostral by 3,3 scales (> 3 mm), from first supralabial by 2,3 scales (2.5+ mm). Rostral much wider (5 mm) than high (2.1 mm at midline). Most dorsal and lateral head scales between and behind eyes keeled except supralabials and adjacent row posterior to 9th or 10th supralabial; no keels on scales of lower jaw or chin. Posteriormost left and right supralabials separated by at least 31 scales.
Supralabials 14,14. Infralabials 15,17, last of which especially small on each side; first pair contact at midline, second to fifth contact genials. Mental triangular, wider (5.1 mm) than long (3.3 mm). First pair of genials largest, contact at midline; second pair of genials much smaller and separated by one pair of smaller gulars; first pair of genials separated from first preventral by four gulars. First ventral separated from last infralabial by 8,7 scales.
Inside of mouth without pigment (except for at least tips of tongue, dark). Teeth mostly hidden in gingivae. Left fang intact, approximately 11.6 mm long.
Three preventrals (four discrete scales distributed over the length of the equivalent of three ventrals), 145 ventrals; ventrals mostly with orthoplicate posterior edges, notably convex in posteriormost ventral. Umbilical notch on posterior margin of 10th to 13th ventral scale anterior to anal scale. Anal shield single, strongly convex posterior margin; subcaudals 20,19 (excluding unpaired terminal scute), without keels; first subcaudal on left divided.
Immediately behind posterior end of lower jaw (level with sixth ventral) 43 dorsal scale rows, reducing to 36 rows ten ventrals further posteriorly. Numbers of dorsal scale rows thereafter fluctuate, most stable between approximately 50th and 110th ventral (35–40 rows, see Appendix 2). Dorsal rows reduced to 30 by 120th ventral; 28 rows at vent. Dorsal scale rows characterized by splits/duplications/divisions on upper part of flanks, fusions on lower part of flanks, beginning (anteriorly) by at least level of 15th ventral. Pattern of divisions, fusions produces posteroventrally oriented ‘lines’ (posteriorly diverging dorsal scale rows) accentuated visually by longitudinal keels on scales ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Scale row formula for 60th to 80th ventral as follows:
Midvertebral scales variably single (vertebral) or double (paravertebral), for example single from level of 60th to 72nd ventral and from 74th to 80th, but double at level of 73rd ventral ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Twentyseven (left) and 25 (right) vertebral scales aligned with the 60th–80th ventral scales ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ). Approximately 17 dorsal scale rows on base of tail at level of anteriormost subcaudal.
Keels on body scales moderate, most prominent on dorsum, less prominent on lower than upper flanks, absent on first dorsal scale row; where prominent, keels extend to distal tip of scales; posterior margins of scales entire (not notched). Difficult to determine presence or absence of apical pits; seemingly present in at least some dorsal body scales, paired, close to scale tips. All scales on tail keeled except for subcaudals.
Colour in preservative essentially two tone ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), with the dark varying from black to dark brown and the pale being ivory (off- or cream-white). Upper surface of head satin-black with two diverging ivory streaks united at the rostral, extending on to the nasal scute, contacting the upper edge of the eye, caudad to the throat and terminating at the retroarticular process. Approximately midway along length of head, the diverging ivory streaks are connected by a narrow (one scale wide), widely-open, V-shaped pale narrow band, broken at midline by 1 or 2 dark scales. Posteriorly a second pale, narrow band extends for five scales slightly obliquely posteriorly towards midline, then turns posteriorly and unites its antimere on the dorsum behind the head. The dark region on the dorsal surface of the head can be seen as a black (narrowly subtransversely bisected) arrowhead, 21 scales wide at its widest point, and reaching to within 3 scales of the rostral anteriorly. At its widest, the dark area bears a small middorsal spot across two scales. Laterally, a preorbital band, narrow but its width spread across two scales, extends from the dorsal streak, immediately anterior to the eye, to the posterior half of the 4th supralabial. A narrow postorbital bar (less than one scale wide) extends from the posterior margin of the eye to the 10th supralabial. Supralabials mostly with pale lower edges. Underside of head entirely pale except for dark anterior and posterior margins of anteriormost infralabials and few flecks posterolaterally, close to posteriormost infralabials.
Upper and lateral surfaces of body mostly dark with pale markings; ventral surface mostly pale with dark markings ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Dorsal body pattern comprises a chain of 21 black sub-lozenge-shaped saddles with approximate maxima of eight scales long by 12 (rarely 14) scales wide. Lateral margins of dark saddles demarcated by narrow (generally one scale wide), irregular pale lines, often with small breaks. The flank pattern comprises broad dark patches that approximately alternate with the dorsal saddles, separated from each other by narrow pale, more or less vertical bars, 1 scale increasing ventrally to 2–3 wide. Within these dark flank markings are small, irregular pale marks. On the mid to upper flanks these pale markings are either isolated flecks or connected to form an inverted V; approximately aligned with these on the lower flanks are larger, wider deltoid pale marks issuing from the belly. Most scales in first dorsal row are pale, such that pale deltoid marks on lower flans are often continuous (ventrally) with vertical bars. The belly has scattered series of irregular spots roughly in three ranks, the innermost two brownish on each ventral plate, the outermost more black, singly or more frequently paired longitudinally. The tail has the same general colour pattern as the body (dark dorsally, pale ventrally), though the dorsal markings are less regular.
Observation of live specimen. On 15 October, 2013, one of us (E.R.B.) observed a live specimen of B. harenna sp. nov. in the Bale Mountains National Park. The observations were made with colleagues Mark Chynoweth, James Kuria Ndung’u, Sisay Sayfu, Abdu Ibrahim and Khalifa Ali – the latter four of whom have worked in the Bale Mountains for at least three years without seeing this species before. The observation was made while driving along the road between the settlements of Rira and Delo Mena, as it passes through the Harenna Forest at approximately 2,140 m elevation (6.694525° N, 39.728576° E). This section of road is within a swath of forest that has openly spaced canopy trees (approximately 10% cover) and a very dense understory of shrubs and vines. The area is approximately 1 km from an illegal settlement (“Aboyea”) within the Bale Mountains National Park. The snake was on a large roadside verge under bright but partly cloudy skies at 12.30 pm. As a result of recent road repair the verge was formed by a large amount of earth and stone (approximately 2 m wide on either side of the road) that had been moved mechanically. This section of road requires regular maintenance in the wet season thus creating fairly regular disturbance for a distance of c. 3 km. Upon sighting, the driver Sisay Sayfu stopped the vehicle within 3 m of the snake, which was apparently basking on the verge and did not move for a few minutes while being observed and photographed. The animal was matt black dorsally, more glossy along the lower flanks. The pale markings were distinctly yellowish. From memory the animal was approximately 1m in total length. It moved slowly off the side of the road and into undergrowth when the observers left the vehicle for closer inspection.
The photographs (one shown in Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ) show an animal clearly very similar to the holotype of B. harenna sp. nov. The colour pattern is the same with minor differences, including a more transverse (not posteromedially deflected) pale bar dorsally on the head behind the eyes. The tail is relatively longer than in the holotype, such that the live specimen is likely male. The animal has a general overall similarity (the ‘jizz’ of birdwatchers) to the puff adder Bitis arietans .
Remarks. The holotype of Bitis harenna sp. nov. was identified previously as B. parviocula (Largen & Rasmussen 1993, Largen & Spawls 2010) and was used by Wittenberg et al. (2015) to score morphological characters for that species in their phylogenetic analyses. The skulls of ZMUC R68255 ( B. harenna sp. nov.) and R68254 and ZFMK63067 ( B. parviocula ), as analysed with HRXCT data, differ in several respects ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Groombridge (1980: 140) reported a derived condition (present in the subgenus Macrocerastes species B. nasicornis and especially B. gabonica [including its then subjective junior synonym B. rhinoceros ]) in which the concavity on the lateral wall of the braincase for the origin of the M. retractor pterygoidei is not limited posteriorly by a flange on the posterior edge of the parietal but instead extends onto the prootic. ZMUC R68255 exhibits the plesiomorphic condition, with a limiting posterior parietal flange ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D) and R68254 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E) and ZFMK 63067 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F) a moderate manifestation of the derived condition, somewhat more like that in B. nasicornis ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 B) than in B. gabonica ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C). The condition in B. parviocula was not previously reported.
In the B. parviocula specimens ZFMK 63067 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F) and ZMUC R68254 ( B. parviocula : Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E) the prootic forms a strong ridge overhanging the foramina for the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve, whereas this ridge is absent in R68255 ( B. harenna sp. nov.: Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D). A strong ridge here is present also in the dried skulls of B. gabonica and B. arietans examined in this study, but much smaller or absent in B. nasicornis . The facets on the anterodorsal edges of the frontals for the medial process of the prefrontals are clearly separated at the midline in the holotype of the new species (ZMUC R69255: Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A) but continuous in the B. parviocula specimens ZMUC R68254 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D) and ZFMK 63067 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G). The B. harenna sp. nov. condition for this character is also present in the skeletal material of B. arietans , B. gabonica , and B. nasicornis examined here. Böhme (1990) suggested that the fangs of B. harenna sp. nov. are relatively longer than those of B. parviocula , but we do not find that to be the case. Although there are very small differences in numbers of teeth between ZMUC R68255 and 68254, making accurate and precise tooth counts from HRXCT data is not easy, and counts for ZFMK63067 suggest there are not clear interspecific differences ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).
The holotype (ZFMK 16803) and the only other known museum specimens (ZFMK 60367, ZMUC R68254) of Bitis parviocula are shown in Figs. 8–10 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 . Although the skull of ZMUC R68254 is partly smashed ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), the proportions of the head of this B. parviocula specimen are nonetheless interpreted as being genuinely different to (more slender than) those of ZMUC R68255. The distance between the snout tip and eye in the holotype of the new species (ZMUC R68255) is 25.7% of the head length but this value in the ZMUC B. parviocula specimen is 32.1% - both specimens were measured on the left side of the head, the left mandible being largely intact in both. This proportion in the less damaged head of ZFMK 63067 is 28.2%, and is approximately 28.4 in the smashed ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ) head of the holotype ZFMK 16803. Although a small individual of B. parviocula (from S.S.’s memory approximately 25 cm long) has the appearance of being relatively slim ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 top left panel; Dobiey & Vogel 2007: 116; Nečas et al. 1993a: fig. 1; Nečas 1997: 59), all photographs of recently wild-caught, larger and presumably adult individuals (examples shown in Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) show heavily bodied, stout animals approximately similar to B. nasicornis , B. rhinoceros and B. gabonica , whereas the holotype of B. harenna sp. nov. and conspecific animal observed live in the Harenna Forest appear somewhat more slender, contributing (along with an apparently more slender, posteriorly elongate head) to its more puff-adder-like form. Bitis parviocula is clearly quite variable in colour and colour pattern ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Dobiey & Vogel 2007) but no specimens approach the distinctive appearance of B. harenna .
The scales of ZMUC R68255 ( B. harenna sp. nov.) are slightly different in texture to those of R68254 ( B. parviocula ), being less horny, but this might be attributable to differences in preservation. The dorsal scalation pattern of ZMUC R68254 ( B. parviocula ) is generally similar to the holotype of B. harenna sp. nov., though the fluctuations in the formula for the 60th to 80th ventral are even more pronounced:
The midvertebral scales in R68254 are also more variable: single from the level of 60th to 73rd ventral and from 74th to 77th, but double at level of 73rd and of 78th to 80th ventral. Compared with the holotype of B. harenna sp. nov., R68254 has more (30–31 versus 25–27: Table 2 View TABLE 2 ) vertebral scales aligned with the 60th–80th ventrals, and the posteroventral ‘lines’ of dorsal scales on the lower flanks are more steeply inclined ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). The range of variation in all characters noted in this paper for B. harenna sp. nov. and B. parviocula can be expected to expand (with unknown magnitude) as more specimens are examined, such that characterization of these two species will need revision in future. A map of the known distribution of the three species of Ethiopian Bitis is presented in Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Böhme (1977) named B. parviocula for its seemingly small eyes, and this morphological feature was interpreted as an indication that the species was somewhat fossorial. The eyes of the type (and at that time only known) specimen of B. parviocula are small by artefact—this specimen was found dead and squashed on the road, and live specimens of the species do not have notably small eyes (Spawls 1994).
Etymology. Named for the Harenna forest and escarpment, in the Bale Mountains National Park, where a live specimen of the new species was recently sighted. For nomenclatural purposes the specific epithet is considered a noun in apposition.
Suggested common name. Bale Mountains adder (English).
Conservation status. We obviously know very little about Bitis harenna sp. nov. and thus its conservation status is likely to be Data Deficient based on IUCN Red List criteria. However, any large snake, especially a probably venomous one, is likely to face persecution in Ethiopia. We are unable to support Nečas et al. ’s (1993b) comments about B. parviocula being revered and protected by local folklore, and all three specimens of this species in museum collections have been damaged and were likely killed (or at least smashed post mortem) by local people. The region as a whole is under great pressure from agriculture and increasing urbanization, exacerbated by very high human population growth. The only known precise locality for B. harenna sp. nov, the Harenna escarpment of the Bale Mountains, is within a National Park but is also under great environmental pressure by human modification of habitats (see Gower et al., 2013). Thus, we suggest there should be urgent concern about the well being of this species in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
Revised key to the Bitis of Ethiopia. Largen and Rasmussen (1993: 383) provided a key to the then two known species of Bitis from Ethiopia. Their key will not work with the addition of the new species, and here we offer the following, modified key to the three nominal Ethiopian species of Bitis :
1 Dorsal pattern consists of V-shapes pointing tailwards; pale interocular stripe running between posterior edge of eyes................................................................................................. Bitis arietans
- Dorsal pattern not comprising V-shapes; pale transverse stripe on dorsum of head substantially behind level of eyes (as far behind eyes as eyes are from snout tip)..................................................................... 2
2 Ground colour yellow, tan or brown, dorsal pattern consists of alternate blackish hexagons and yellowish butterfly shapes............................................................................................ Bitis parviocula
- Ground colour black, dorsal pattern consists of fine to broad yellowish reticulations................ Bitis harenna sp. nov.
TABLE 1. Morphometric and meristic data for specimens of Bitis harenna sp. nov. and B. parviocula. Dimensions in mm; * indicates holotype; values separated by comma given in left, right order; characters in the form “ X – Y ” represent shortest distance between (not including) structures “ X ” and “ Y ”; distances measured in number of scales represents fewest scales between two points. Head length measured as snout tip – posterior end of retroarticular process. Mental and rostral shield dimensions are for externally exposed surfaces. Circumorbital count includes supraocular scale. Data for holotype of B. parviocula in parentheses from Böhme (1977). Tooth counts are recorded from µCT reconstructions. Blank cells indicate data not recorded; dash indicates data could not be recorded.
| B. harenna * | B. parviocula * | B. parviocula | B. parviocula | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMUC R68255 | ZFMK 16803 | ZFMK 63067 | ZMUC R68254 | |
| Sex | female | female | - | female |
| Total length | 665 | c.760 (752) | - | c. 890 |
| Snout-vent length (SVL) | 625 | c.710 (705) | - | c.830 |
| Tail length | 39.7 | 47.6 | - | 61 |
| Maximum width of tail | 9.0 | 14.7 | - | 18.3 |
| Maximum body circumference (C) | 100 | 125 | - | 175 |
| SVL/C | 6.5 | - | - | 4.9 |
| Head width (maximum) | 31.5 | - | 43.2 | 60.4 |
| Head length | 44.8 | 45.8 | 52.0 | 55.5 |
| Diameter of exposed part of eye | 3.6 | - | 6.5 | 4.9 |
| Eye–eye | 12.3 | - | 16.7 | 19.0 |
| Eye–lip | 6.1 | 7.7 | 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Eye–snout tip | 11.5 | 13.0 | 14.1 | 17.8 |
| Eye–naris | 5.1 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 6.7 |
| Naris–naris | 6.5 | - | 9.9 | 10.6 |
| Length of naris | 1.8 | - | 2.4 | 2.9 |
| Circumorbital scales | 12,15 | 15,15 (14) | 14,15 | 12,14 |
| Scales circumorbitals–supralabials | 2 to 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 to 3 |
| Scales L–R circumorbitals | 10 | 10 (12) | 9 | 9 |
| Scales L–R supranasal | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Scales circumorbitals–supranasal | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,2 |
| Scales nasal–rostral | 3,3 | 4,4 | 4,4 | 4,4 |
| Scales nasal–supralabial 1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 4,4 | 3,3 |
| Scales supranasal–rostral | 3,3 | 3,3 | 3,3 | 3,3 |
| Scales supranasal–supralabial 1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 3,3 | 3,3 |
| Width of rostral scale | 5.0 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 7.6 |
| Height of rostral scale | 2.1 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
| Supralabial scales | 14,14 | 13,16 (13,14) | 15 or 16,16 | 15,14 |
| Infralabial scales | 15,17 | 16,16 (15,15) | 17,15 | 15,14 |
| Scales first genial-first preventral | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 or 4 |
| Dorsal scales last L–R supralabial | 31 | 32 | 29 | 30 |
| Width mental scale | 5.1 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Length mental scale | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Preventral scales | 3 | 3 | 4 or 5 | 3 or 4 |
| Ventral scales | 145 | 141 (144) | - | 146 |
| Subcaudal scales | 20,19 | 21,21 (21,21) | - | 21,21 |
| Scale rows at base of tail | c. 17 | c.21 | - | c.19 |
| Palatine teeth | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,2 | |
| Pterygoid teeth | 12,12 | 13?, 11–13 | 13,13 | |
| Mandibular teeth | 17,17 | 15,16–18 | 18,18 |
TABLE 2. Variation in numbers of vertebral scales aligned with 20 approximately midbody ventral scales in species of Bitis. Numbers separated by a comma are values reported for left, right side where that differs. Some of these specimens are illustrated in Fig. 6. All specimen numbers have BMNH prefix unless otherwise indicated.
| Species and specimen B. harenna sp. nov. ZMUC R68255 | Position of 20 ventral scales 60–80 | Number of vertebral scales 27, 25 |
|---|---|---|
| B. parviocula ZFMK 16803 B. parviocula ZMUC R68254 | 50–70 60–80 | 29 31, 30 |
| B. gabonica 1968.54 B. gabonica 96.5.14.20 B. gabonica 1975.1118 B. gabonica 1971.414 B. gabonica 1950.1.2.15 B. gabonica 1969.526 | 55–75 55–75 55–75 55–75 55–75 55–75 | 28 35 41 34 31 33 |
| B. rhinoceros 1930.11.19.75 B. rhinoceros unnumbered B. nasicornis ‘529’ B. nasicornis 1971.415 B. nasicornis 1935.10.2.1 B. nasicornis 1952.1.6.57 (118 ventrals) | 55–75 55–75 50–70 55–75 55–75 50–70 | 30.5 31 37 41 32 41 |
| B. nasicornis 1952.1.6.57 (123 ventrals) B. nasicornis 1952.1.6.57 (128 ventrals) B. arietans 87.11.3.32 B. arietans 1975.2146 | 50–70 50–70 60–80 60–80 | 37 38 20 21 |
| otherwise indicated.² |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
