Azana akarenos Kerr and Greenwalt, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1215 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CC7CF97-AE37-4717-9340-6310AC3ACB84 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/465EEEB4-8583-4425-8878-FF79F8A4D252 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:465EEEB4-8583-4425-8878-FF79F8A4D252 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Azana akarenos Kerr and Greenwalt |
status |
sp. nov. |
Azana akarenos Kerr and Greenwalt View in CoL sp. n.
Figures 6-7 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7
zoobank.org/ 465EEEB4-8583-4425-8878-FF79F8A4D252
Type species. Azana scatopsoides Walker, 1856 View in CoL , by monotypy (= Azana anomala Staeger, 1840 View in CoL ).
Holotype. Female, USNM 625099 About USNM , deposited in the Paleobiology collections of the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.
Locality and horizon. Spring site, Middle Fork of the Flathead River (Pinnacle, Montana, USA). Middle Eocene Coal Creek Member, Kishenehn Formation.
Etymology. The species epithet is derived from the Greek term akarenos , meaning headless.
Diagnosis. Head is either not present or barely visible on left side of thorax below anterior margin of wing; thorax arched; costa produced beyond tip of R 4+5; subcosta short, ending free; r-m long, arising near base of wing; Rs essentially absent as R 1 and r-m veins touch; M 1 obsolete at its base, M 4 faintly present at wing margin.
Description (female). Body length 2.05 mm (from terminus of genitalia to middle of scutum); scutum, scutellum, abdomen and terminalia dark brown, legs light brown ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Wings 1.61 mm (right) and 1.66 mm (left) in length, 0.64 mm wide, lightly infuscate without markings, membrane densely microtrichose, veins thick and brown (except base of M 1 obsolete); costal vein extends beyond R 4+5, approximately 0.18 of distance between R 4+5 and M 1; Sc short; R 1 reaching C at 0.47 times length of wing; Rs imperceptible, R 1 touching longitudinal rm/R 4+5; ratio of R 1 to R 4+5 0.27 (given difficulty of locating Rs, this value could range from 0.24 to 0.27); r-m long and longitudinal; M 1 obsolete at base, but well defined in apical 2/3, extending straight to wing margin far beyond apex of wing; M 2 absent, M 4 present at right wing margin, about 0.2 mm in length (about twice the distance between M 4 and CuA), delaminated and very faint in left wing; CuA strong, more angled than smoothly curved (i.e., with defined inflection point) ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 A-C); halter relatively small, 0.19 mm long, knob 0.07 mm wide, stem and knob light brown. Femur covered in short, light brown setae;
PALAEO- ELECTRONICA.ORG all tibial setae shorter than width of tibia; mid and hind tibiae with row of several larger spines; abdomen 1.3 mm long, 0.62 mm wide; tibial spurs 1:2:2 ( Figure 7D View FIGURE 7 ). Gonostylus absent; abdomen suggestive of a female ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
Male. Unknown.
Synimpressions. Chironomidae (32, one at mideclosion), Parasitica ( Hymenoptera ) (1), Corixidae (2), Hemiptera (1), Dipteran pupae (6), unidentified larvae (2), Diptera (2)
Remarks. Mycetophilidae is a diverse group of small nematocerous Diptera with approximately 4,900 described species including 403 described fossil species ( Evenhuis and Pape, 2021). However, the Sciophiline genus Azana contains only 13 extant species, although it is widely distributed ( Kerr, 2010). Species of the genus are easily distinguished by reduced wing venation; Sc short, ending free; M 1 obsolete at its base; M 4 vestigially present, near wing margin. The habitus of extant species of Azana provides a rationale for the missing head of A. akarenos . The middle of the scutum is the anterior-most aspect of the bodies of these flies, with the entire head tucked below the ventral aspect of the thorax. From a dorsal view, therefore, the head is typically not visible. In the fossil, the head is probably mostly buried in the shale matrix although a portion of it may be seen to the left, near the base of the wing (computed tomography using a GE Phoenix micro CT failed to image the specimen.). Azana akarenos is distinct from the single fossil known for the genus, A. rarissima Meunier , described from Baltic amber by Meunier (1904). Meunier (1904) described the antenna of A. rarissima , figured its wing and stated that the 2.0 mm-long insect had tibial spines and setose tarsi. The two Eocene species are distinguished from one another based on the ratio of R 1 to R 4+5, 0.22 in A. rarissima and 0.24-0.27 in A. akarenos . More obvious, however, is the difference in the length of Rs. In A. akarenos , this vein – in both the left and right wings – is short to the point of not existing; R 1 and the junction of r-m and R 4+5 touch oneanother. In contrast, the length of Rs in A. rarissima is 80% of the distance between R 1 and C, at that point.
Given that differentiation of the various species of the genus are based mostly on characteristics of the head and male terminalia, and color, it would be futile to attempt a detailed comparison of A. akarenos with extant members of the genus. However, the four extant species of Azana from North America differ from A. akarenos with respect to the same character states used to distinguish the two fossil species of the genus. Azana malinamoena Kerr, 2010 , A. frizzelli Kerr, 2010 and A. sinusa Coher, 1995 (= A. pilosa Taber ) have distinctly longer R 1 veins relative to the length of R 4+5 (ratios = 0.37, 0.34, 0.39 and 0.36, respectively). In addition, all three of these species have a distinct Rs vein, although in A. sinusa the length of Rs is only about the width of the vein itself ( Coher, 1995; Taber, 2017). In A. atlantica Oliveira and Balbi, 2008 (in Amorim et al., 2008a), collected in Brazil, Rs and r-m are separated by slightly more than a vein width but the base of r-m is absent and “r-m indistinct from Rs” ( Amorim et al., 2008b). Again,
PALAEO- ELECTRONICA.ORG the ratio of R 1 to R 4+5 is large, in this case 0.37 (vs. 0.27 in A. akarenos ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |