Gonatocerus ater Foerster 1841: 45
Gonatocerus ater Foerster
Walker 1846: 53
Kirchner 1867: 201
Dalla Torre 1898: 429
Hellén 1974: 13
Matthews 1986: 221
ater species group
Donev 1987: 73
Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70
Donev 1988d: 194
Donev 1988e: 203
Donev 2005: 383
Pricop 2010b: 112
Anwar & Zeya 2012: 52
Zeya & Khan 2012: 57
Rachistus ater ( Foerster): Foerster 1847 : 206–207
Gonatocerus pannonicus Soyka 1946: 39
Matthews 1986: 221
Lymaenon ater (Förster)
Debauche 1948: 81
Viggiani & Jesu 1988: 1023
Lymaenon schmitzi Debauche 1948: 86–88
Matthews 1986: 221
Lymaenon indicus Subba Rao & Kaur 1959: 229–231
Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70
Lymaenon nigroides Narayanan & Subba Rao 1961: 656–657
Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70
Lymaenon schmitzi Debauche
Boţoc 1962: 108
Viggiani 1969: 39
longicauda species group
Lymaenon
Lymaenon intermedius Boţoc 1962: 108–110
Matthews 1986: 222
Lymaenon empoascae Subba Rao 1966: 190
Stethynium empoascae Subba Rao
Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70
Lymaenon populi Viggiani 1969: 40–44
Matthews 1986: 222
Gonatocerus populi ( Viggiani): Graham 1973 : 48
Graham 1973
Pricop 2010b: 113
G. intermedius (Boţoc)
Gonatocerus empoascae ( Subba Rao): Subba Rao & Hayat 1983 : 135
Subba Rao & Hayat 1983
Gonatocerus indicus (Subba Rao & Kaur)
Subba Rao & Hayat 1983: 135
Gonatocerus nigriodes
Subba Rao): Subba Rao & Hayat 1983 : 136
Lymaenon populi Viggiani
Viggiani 1988: 561
Viggiani & Jesu 1988: 1023
G. ater
Lymaenon cicadellae Viggiani
Viggiani 1988: 563
L. populi
Gonatocerus schmitzi (Debauche)
Huber 1988: 50
ater species group
G. latipennis
Gonatocerus pannonicus Soyka
Pricop 2010b: 112
G. ater
Gonatocerus intermedius (Boţoc)
Pricop 2010b: 113
Review of Gonatocerus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the Palaearctic region, with notes on extralimital distributions
Triapitsyn, Serguei V.
Zootaxa
2013
2013-04-30
3644
1
1
178
Foerster, 1841
Foerster
1841
[151,788,487,513]
Insecta
Mymaridae
Gonatocerus
Animalia
Hymenoptera
118
119
Arthropoda
species
lato
ater
Cosmocomoidea
( Figs 206–247)
Gonatocerus ater Foerster 1841: 45.
Type locality (of the lectotypedesignated here): Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Gonatocerus aterFoerster[or Förster]: Walker 1846: 53(English translation of the original description); Kirchner 1867: 201(catalog); Dalla Torre 1898: 429(catalog); Hellén 1974: 13(diagnosis, distribution); Matthews 1986: 221–222(synonymy, diagnosis, member of the aterspecies group); Donev 1987: 73–74(distribution); Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70–72(synonymy, references on the Indian synonyms, redescription, host association, distribution) + 129, 137–138 (illustrations); Donev 1988d: 194(distribution); Donev 1988e: 203(distribution); Donev 2005: 383(diagnosis, distribution); Pricop 2010b: 112–113(diagnosis, distribution), 114 (illustrations); Anwar & Zeya 2012: 52(distribution in India); Zeya & Khan 2012: 57(distribution). Rachistus ater( Foerster): Foerster 1847: 206–207(diagnosis), 232 (list, distribution). Gonatocerus pannonicus Soyka 1946: 39.
Type locality: Hundsheim, Lower Austria, Austria. Synonymized under G. aterby Matthews 1986: 221.
Lymaenon ater(Förster): Debauche 1948: 81(list); Viggiani & Jesu 1988: 1023(polytypic species based on the study of the type material). Lymaenon schmitzi Debauche 1948: 86–88, plate IX (illustrations).
Type locality: Heverlee (as Héverlé in the original description), Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgium. Synonymized under G. aterby Matthews 1986: 221.
Lymaenon indicus Subba Rao & Kaur 1959: 229–231.
Holotypefemale [ IARI] (not examined). Type locality: New Delhi, Delhi, India. Synonymized under G. aterby Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70.
Lymaenon nigroides Narayanan & Subba Rao 1961: 656–657.
Holotypefemale [lost from IARI( Zeya & Hayat 1995)] (not examined). Type locality: Delhi, India. Synonymized under G. aterby Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70.
Lymaenon schmitziDebauche: Boţoc 1962: 108(short diagnosis); Viggiani 1969: 39(member of the longicaudaspecies groupof Lymaenon). Lymaenon intermedius Boţoc 1962: 108–110.
Type status not indicated, five females of the type series mentioned in the original description (although Matthews (1986)incorrectly designated a holotype), all of which were syntypes) [lost together with the entire M. Boţoc’s personal collection of the Romanian Mymaridae ( Pricop 2010b)] (not examined). Type locality: “Aluviunea Someşului” (Someş [river] deposits—i.e., Someş River flood plain), near Cluj-Napoca, Cluj County, Romania. Synonymized under G. aterby Matthews 1986: 222but treated as a valid species by Pricop (2010b), see “Comments” below.
Lymaenon empoascae Subba Rao 1966: 190(illustrations [plate III, under Stethynium empoascaeSubba Rao!]), 195–196. Holotypefemale [IARI] (not examined).
Type locality: “Jullunder” (Jalandhar), Punjab, India[or Jullundhur ( Subba Rao et al.1968), although Zeya & Hayat (1995)indicated it as Jallunder (p. 70) but under “Specimens examined” (p. 72) they indicated it as “ INDIA: Delhi”]. Synonymized under G. aterby Zeya & Hayat 1995: 70.
Lymaenon populi Viggiani 1969: 40–44.
Type locality: Rome, Lazio, Italy(Gennaro Viggiani, personal communication; the collecting locality of the holotypewas not indicated either in the original description or on the two holotypeslides). Synonymized under G. aterby Matthews 1986: 222.
Gonatocerus populi( Viggiani): Graham 1973: 48(record from Ireland); Pricop 2010b: 113(possible synonym of G. intermedius(Boţoc)—see “Comments” below). Gonatocerus empoascae( Subba Rao): Subba Rao & Hayat 1983: 135(catalog). Gonatocerus indicus(Subba Rao & Kaur): Subba Rao & Hayat 1983: 135(catalog). Gonatocerus nigriodes[sic] (Narayanan & Subba Rao): Subba Rao & Hayat 1983: 136(catalog). Lymaenon populiViggiani: Viggiani 1988: 561(illustration); Viggiani & Jesu 1988: 1023(host association, valid species separate from G. ater). Lymaenon cicadellaeViggiani: Viggiani 1988: 563(misspelling of L. populi). Gonatocerus schmitzi(Debauche): Huber 1988: 50( aterspecies group, quite similar to the Nearctic species G. latipennis). Gonatocerus pannonicusSoyka: Pricop 2010b: 112–113(possible synonym of G. ater), 114 (illustrations). Gonatocerus intermedius(Boţoc): Pricop 2010b: 113(valid species, diagnosis based on non-type specimens, records from Romania—see “Comments” below), 114–116 (illustrations).
Type material examined. Gonatocerus aterFoerster: lectotype female[ NHMW], here designated to avoid the existing confusion regarding the type specimens of this species, on slide ( Fig. 206) labeled [in Soyka’s handwriting]: 1. “ GonatocerusƤ ater”; 2. [an empty red label]; 3. [Soyka’s slide number] “742”; 4. “ Gonat. aterFörster Type Aachen Förster Coll. G. Mayr In Canadab. 1943”. The lectotype was poorly remounted by Soyka from a minuten pin, with several parts of the specimen separate under the coverslip and one hind wing in the excess balsam not covered by it (the other hind wing is missing). Matthews (1986: 221)and Pricop (2010b: 112–114)erroneously mentioned this specimen (on Soyka’s slide No. 742) as holotypeof G. aterbut that was not a valid lectotypedesignation (Article 74.5, [ ICZN] 1999) because the original description mentioned an unspecified number of female and male specimens, all of which are syntypes. Paralectotypes: 1 Ƥ [ NHMW] on slide labeled: 1. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “ GonatocerusƤ foresteri[sic, Soyka’s manuscript name, in pencil]”; 2. [an empty red label]; 3. [Soyka’s slide number] “20”; 4. [partially in?Foerster’s handwriting, partially printed] “ Gon. aterFörster, Type”; 5. [printed] “Collect. G. Mayr”; 6. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “In Canadab. 1943”. This specimen ( Figs 290–292) actually belongs to G.( Cosmocomoidea) oxypygusFoerster.1 3 [ NHMW] on slide labeled: 1. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “ Gonatocerus3 aterFörsterType”; 2. [red] “Allo-Type” [incorrectly labeled as such by Soyka]; 3. [Soyka’s slide number] “18”; 4. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “ Gonatocerus aterFörsterType Coll. G. Mayr In Canadab. 1943”. This specimen ( Fig. 213) is mounted laterally, so the propodeal submedian carinae are not fully visible; it belongs to G.( Cosmocomoidea) and may be or may not be conspecific with the female lectotype; Pricop (2010b)was of opinion that it resembles G. ovicenatusLeonard & Crosby.1 3 [ NHMW] on slide labeled: 1. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “ Gonatocerus3 aterfoersteri[Soyka’s manuscript name]”; 2. [partially in?Foerster’s handwriting, partially printed] “ Gon. aterFörster, Type”; 3. [printed] “Aach. Först.”; 4. [in Soyka’s handwriting] “In Canadab. 1943”. This specimen actually belongs to G. acuminatus. Potential paralectotypes: 1 Ƥ, 1 3 [ MHNG] on minuten pins inserted in the same small balsawood piece on a pin labeled: 1. [in A. Foerster’s handwriting] “ Gonatocerus aterFrst.”; 2. “Not Rachistus aterFst. 1847 W. D. Hincks”; 3. [in blue ink] “ Gonatocerus aterF.”. At least the female actually belongs to G. oxypygus. Although Foerster (1847)indicated 2 femalesand 1 maleof G. ater, actually 4 specimens( 2 femalesand 2 males) in NHMWcan be unambiguously attributed to the syntypeseries of this species, and these belong at least to 3 different taxa. In addition, the abovementioned female in MHNGcould also be part of the syntypeseries although that is less likely. All Foerster’s specimens identified by him as G. atermore or less fit the vague original description even though they represent several different species; in this situation I follow Matthews (1986), the first reviser, and designate as lectotypethe specimen he mentioned as “ holotype”. The original description of G. ater( Foerster 1841, p. 45) stated, as newly translated here from German: “2. Gon. ater. Black, shining, antennae brown, scape yellowish, legs black-brown, knees and apices of tibiae and tarsi yellow, fore tibiae completely yellow. 3. Ƥ. Lg. [Length] 2/5 Lin. [Linie (an old Germanmeasuring unit, usually = 1/ 12 inch, but could also = 1/ 10 inch)]”. Later, Foerster (1847, pp. 206–207)added the following to the diagnosis of G. ater[as Rachistus ater] (partial translation from German): “Body coloration completely dark. Scape dark brown and rather wide. F1–F4 very short and of the same length and progressively thicker. F5 considerably longer and thicker than F6; F6–F8 almost the same length. F8 equals F 5 inthickness. Clava almost the same length as F6–F8 combined. 2 Ƥ, 1 3 from the same area [i.e., Aachen]”. Gonatocerus pannonicusSoyka: holotype female[ NHMW] on slide labeled: 1. “ GonatoceruspannonicusƤ ( Soyka) Type det. W. Soyka”, 2. [red] “Type”, 3. “809”, 4. “ Hundsheim 9 Sept 1940in Canadabalsam”. Thecollecting date on the holotypeslide does not match the one ( August 1941) indicated in the original description of G. pannonicusby Soyka(1946). The holotypeis mounted laterally, insufficiently cleared, lacking F5–F8 and clava of one antenna. Lymaenon populiViggiani: holotype female[ DEZA(current depository), although Viggiani (1969)indicated that the holotype femalewas to be deposited in the collection of the Center of the Identification of Entomophagues of the International Organization for Biological Control in Geneva, Switzerland(at MHNG)] on 2 slides, as follows: slide 1 (head, one antenna, and 1 fore wing), labeled: “ Coll. O. I. L. B.27.67/2 1 Ƥ Lymaenonpopuli n. sp.olotipo det. G. Viggiani’69”; slide 1 (remainder of the specimen), labeled: “ Coll. O. I. L. B.27.67/ 2 Ƥ Lymaenonpopuli n. sp.olotipo det. G. Viggiani’69”. Paratypes[all DEZA]: 1 Ƥon slide labeled: “ Lymaenon populiVigg.paratipo 1 Ƥ Roma, VI.68ex uova Cicadellaviridissu pioppo”; 1 Ƥon slide labeled: “ Lymaenon populiVigg.paratipo Ƥ Roma, VI.68ex uova Cic. viridis”; 1 Ƥon slide labeled: “ Lymaenon populiVigg.paratipo Ƥ Roma, VI/68ex uova Cic. viridis”; 1 3 on slide labeled: “ Lymaenon populiVigg.3 paraallotipo de uova cicadellide su pioppo Roma, VI/68leg. Cavascasolle”. Allthe paratypesare dissected in several body parts. Lymaenon schmitziDebauche: holotype female[ ISNB] on slide ( Fig. 214) labeled: 1. “ Héverlé 1.VI.41— no140 1 [the last number in pencil]”; 2. “Dr. H. DEBAUCHE det. LymaenonschmitziDeb. 1943Ƥ TYPE [the latter glued on a red triangleonto the right label]”. The holotype( Fig. 216) is in fair condition although uncleared, complete, and mounted dorsoventrally. Paratypes[both ISNB]: 13 (the allotype) on slide labeled: 1. “ Lab. D’Entomologiede l’Université Louvain Eegenhoven 11.V.42. 180”, 2. “Dr. H. DEBAUCHE det. LymaenonschmitziDeb. 19433 ALLO TYPE [sic, the latter glued on a red triangleonto the right label]”; 1 3 on slide labeled: 1. “ Lab. D’Entomologiede l’Université Louvain Eegenhoven 18.V.42no183”, 2. “Dr. H. DEBAUCHE det. LymaenonschmitziDeb. 19433 PARA TYPE [sic, the latter glued on a red triangleonto the right label]”. Both paratypesare uncleared and mounted laterally so that the propodeal carinae are not visible.
Material examined. Gonatocerus ater s. str.(i.e., specimensthat more or less agree with the lectotype, particularly in the shape of the propodeal carinae). CZECH REPUBLIC.HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ, Orlické Mountains, Kačerov Nature Reserve, 50°14’25.241’’N 16°23’07.139’’E, 690 m, 20.x.2008, J. Hájek[ 1 Ƥ, CUPC]. RUSSIA.MOSCOVSKAYA OBLAST’: Noginskiyrayon, Fryazevo, M.E. Tretiakov: 1–18.v.2000[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 2.vi.2002[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 9.vii.2002[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. Pushkinskiyrayon, Pushkino, Mamontovka, Sosnovka, 5– 16.v.2001, E.Ya. Shuvakhina[ 2 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]. SAKHALINSKAYA OBLAST’, Sakhalin Island, 2 kmE Sokol, D.J. Bennett, T. Anderson, 21.vii.2001[ 1 Ƥ, CAS]. TAMBOVSKAYA OBLAST’, Inzhavinskiyrayon, Talinka( 7 km Sof Pavlovka), 26–27.v.2000, M.E. Tretiakov[1 3, UCRC]. UK. ENGLAND: Berkshire Co., Ascot, Silwood Park, 11.vi.1994, J.S. Noyes[4 3, CNCI]. Cheshire Co., Lymm, 28.v.1949, W.D. Hincks[ 1 Ƥ, MMUE]. WALES, BridgendCo. Borough, Kenfig Pool National Nature Reserve, 4.viii.1994, J.S. Noyes[1 3, CNCI]. Gonatocerus ater s. l.(i.e., specimens that either do not agree with the lectotypein the shape of the propodeal carinae but fit Matthews’ (1986) and Zeya & Hayat’s (1995)concepts of the species, or for which the shape of the propodeal carinae is not known or has not been recorded for various reasons). BELGIUM. LIÈGE, Wanze, Antheit, Corphalie, 27.iv–11.v.1990, R. Detry[ 1 Ƥ, ISNB]. WALLOON BRABANT, Waterloo, 26.vii– 2.viii.1992, P. Dessart[ 1 Ƥ, [ ISNB]. GERMANY. NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA: Cologne, 6.viii.1962, M. Boness[ 3 Ƥ, NHMW]. Leverkusen, 3.vii.1963, M. Boness[ 1 Ƥ, NHMW]. GREECE.CENTRAL MACEDONIA, Lake Kerkini, Kerkini Marsh, 41°13’32.8’’N 23°05’04.2’’E, 45 m, 11–17.iv.2007, G. Ramel[ 1 Ƥ, 3 3, UCRC]. RUSSIA.KRASNODARSKIY KRAY, Krasnodar, 19–20.viii.2001, V.V. Kostjukov[1 3, UCRC]. KALUZHSKAYA OBLAST’, Sivkovo, 18.viii.1978, V.A. Trjapitzin[ 1 Ƥ, ZIN]. PRIMORSKIY KRAY, Ussuriyskiyrayon, Gornotayozhnoye, M.V. Michailovskaya: 11–12.vi.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 23–24.vi.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 1–2.vii.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 11–14.vii.1999[ 2 Ƥ, 1 3, UCRC]; 24.vii–1.viii.1999[ 2 Ƥ, IBPV, UCRC]; 27.vii–1.viii.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 4–5.viii.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 5–11.viii.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 12–17.viii.1999[ 2 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]; 22–28.viii.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; viii.1999[ 4 Ƥ, IBPV, UCRC, ZIN]; viii–ix.1999[1 3, UCRC]; 10– 15.ix.1999[ 3 Ƥ, UCRC]; 25–26.ix.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; ix.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 8–11.x.1999[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 1– 10.vii.2000[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 10–20.vii.2000[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 21–26.viii.2000[ 2 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]; viii.2000[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. SAKHALINSKAYA OBLAST’, Sakhalin Island, 6 kmE of Sokol, 16.viii.2001[1 3, CAS]. STAVROPOL’SKIY KRAY, Prietokskiy, V.V. Kostjukov: 29.viii.2002[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 7.viii.2003[ 4 Ƥ, UCRC]; 12.viii.2003[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]; 14.viii.2003[ 3 Ƥ, UCRC]. UK. ENGLAND: Cheshire Co., Middlewood, 6.vii.1948, H. Britten[ 1 Ƥ, MMUE]. Surrey Co., Dorking, J.S. Noyes: Leith Hill, 26.viii.1984[ 1 Ƥ, BMNH] (det. M.J. Matthews); White Downs, 21.ix.1986[ 1 Ƥ, CNCI]. Countryor locality not indicated (most likely Aachenarea, North Rhine-Westphalia, GERMANY): 2 Ƥ[ MHNG] on minuten pins inserted in the same small balsawood piece on a pin labeled: 1. [in A. Foerster’s handwriting] “ Gonatocerus ecaudatusFrst.” [Foerster’s manuscript name]; 2. [in blue ink] “ Gonatocerus ecaudatusF.” (mounted together, but on separate minuten pins, with a female of G. oxypygus).
Distribution.PALAEARCTIC: Gonatocerus ater s. str.: Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Russia*, and UK( England, and Wales*). Records of this species from Austria( Soyka 1946) [as G. pannonicus], Bulgaria( Donev 1986[also as G. populi], 1987, 1988d, 1988e, 2005), Finland( Hellén 1974), Greece( Donev 1988c, 2005), Ireland( Graham 1973) [as G. populi], Italy( Viggiani 1969) [as G. populi], Netherlands( Noyes 2012), Romania( Boţoc 1962[as L. schmitzi]; Pricop 2009b; Pricop 2010b[as G. intermedius], and Sweden( Hedqvist 2003) need confirmation. NEARCTIC*: USA* ( G. ater s. l., see “Comments” below for Lymaenon populi). ORIENTAL: India( Zeya & Hayat 1995; Anwar & Zeya 2012; Zeya & Khan 2012) ( G. ater s. l., records need confirmation).
Redescription.FEMALE ( lectotypeof G. ater, 5 non-type specimens of G. ater s. str.from Moskovskaya oblast’, Russia, 1 non-type specimen from Kačerov Nature Reserve, Czech Republic, and 1 non-type specimen from Lymm, England, that agree with the lectotype). Body length 840–860 µm (dry-mounted specimens from Kačerov Nature Reserve and Lymm, respectively). Body and appendages mostly dark brown, legs light to dark brown. Head ( Fig. 207) about as wide as mesosoma. Antenna ( Figs 207, 209, 217–218) with radicle 0.24–0.29× total length of scape, rest of scape 2.1–2.4× as long as wide; pedicel much longer than F1; F1 and F2 subequal in length and the shortest funicle segments, F4 slightly shorter than F3 and shorter than following funicle segments, F5–F8 more or less subequal in length when F6 bears 1 or 2 mps except F8 slightly shorter, but if F6 lacks mps then F6 about as long as F8 or slightly shorter; mps on F5 (2), F6 (0, 1, or 2), F7 (2), and F8 (2); clava with 8 mps, 2.1–2.4× as long as wide, almost as long as combined length of F6–F8 or a little shorter. Mesosoma ( Fig. 210) about as long as gaster ( Fig. 211) or a little shorter. Propodeum ( Figs 208, 219) with fine, usually complete submedian carinae that narrow from propodeal posterior margin (their widest point) and either join together anteriorly at propodeal anterior margin at apex of dorsellum (as in the lectotype, Fig. 208) or fading at dorsellum ( Fig. 219). Fore wing ( Figs 212, 220) 2.6–2.8× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 0.19– 0.2× maximum wing width; disc with a slight brownish tinge and bare behind venation except for 3 or more setae behind stigmal vein, and densely setose elsewhere. Hindwing ( Fig. 220) 12–14× as long as wide; disc unevenly setose, with a slight brownish tinge; longest marginal seta 1.6–1.7× maximum wing width. FIGURES 217–219. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. str.Ƥ (Mamontovka, Moskovskaya oblast’, Russia): 217–218, antennae; 219, dorsellum and propodeum. Metasoma. Petiole short, about 2.2× as wide as long; ovipositor ( Fig. 211) not or at most barely exserted beyond apex of gaster, 1.1–1.4× as long as mesotibia. Measurements (µm) of the lectotype. Head (as height: width) 264:283; mesosoma 474; ovipositor 412. Antenna: radicle 42; rest of scape 124; pedicel 64; F1 36; F2 36; F3 41; F4 40; F5 57; F6 49; F7 55; F8 49; clava 142. Fore wing 1236:474; longest marginal seta 91. Hindwing 947:81. Mesotibia 354. MALE (non-type specimens from Englandand Russia). Body length 1130–1250 µm (slide-mounted specimens). Similar to female except for normal sexually dimorphic features and the following. Antenna ( Fig. 221) with scape 1.5–1.8× as long as wide, F1 wider than other flagellomeres. Fore wing ( Fig. 222) 2.5–2.7× as long as wide. Genitalia as in Fig. 223.
Diagnosis. Gonatocerus ater s. str.is characterized mainly by the fine, usually complete submedian carinae that narrow from propodeal posterior margin (their widest point) and either joining together anteriorly at propodeal anterior margin at apex of dorsellum ( Fig. 208) or fading at dorsellum ( Fig. 219). The scape minus radicle of the female antenna ( Figs 217–218) is 2.1–2.4× as long as wide, and F3 normally lacks mps (although not observed in the specimens studied, presumably F 3 mayoccasionally have a mps on one or both antennae, particularly in large specimens). The ovipositor is short (1.1–1.4× as long as mesotibia) and not or at most barely exserted beyond apex of gaster ( Fig. 211). Hosts.Unknown for G. ater s. str. Amrasca biguttula(Ishida)[as Empoasca devastansDistant] for Lymaenon empoascae( Subba Rao 1966; Subba Rao et al.1968) and Cicadella viridis(Linnaeus)for Lymaenon populi( Viggiani 1969) (Cicadellidae). However, later Viggiani (1988)[as Lymaenon cicadellae Viggiani] and Viggiani & Jesu (1988)indicated Rhytidodus decimaquartus(Schrank)[as R. decimusquartus] as the host of L. populiin Italy.
Comments.In the holotypeof L. schmitzithe submedian carinae on the propodeum are more or less clearly visible ( Fig. 215); they appear to be subparallel and fading anteriorly, not extending to the anterior margin of the propodeum and thus not joining at the apex of dorsellum. The antenna ( Fig. 216) is more or less similar to that of the lectotypeof G. ater: one antenna of the former has 2 mps on F6 and the other lacks mps, and in the latter one antenna has 1 mps on F6 and the other lacks mps; both lack mps on F1–F4 and have 2 mps on F5, F7, and F8. Also, in the holotypeof L. schmitzithe scape minus radicle is about 2.3× as long as wide, the fore wing is 2.7× as long as wide, and the ovipositor is about 1.4× mesotibia length. Taking all this into consideration, I accept (although not confidently) the synonymy of L. schmitziunder G. ater. More, fresh, and properly prepared material from or near the type localities of both nominal taxa is needed to assess variation, particularly of the shape of the propodeal submedian carinae. Because the holotypefemale of G. pannonicusis mounted laterally, it is impossible to see the propodeal submedian carinae in dorsal view. F3 of its antenna is notably longer than F1, F2, or F4 and subequal to F5 (both are the longest funicle segments); mps are on F3 (1 or?2), F4 (0), F5 (2), F6 (1), F7 (?1 or 2), and F8 (2). The ovipositor is short, about 0.7× length of the gaster, not exserted beyond its apex. I tentatively accept the synonymy of this species under G. aterby Matthews (1986)although at the same time agree with Pricop (2010b)that these two taxa may not be conspecific. Possibly, G. pannonicusis conspecific with L. intermediusand also with L. populi, as described and illustrated by Boţoc (1962)and Viggiani (1969), respectively, as all these taxa have similar female antennae and short ovipositors. The holotypeof G. pannonicusneeds to be carefully re-mounted dorsoventrally to be able to see its propodeal submedian carinae and thus determine its true identity. FIGURES 221–223. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. str.3 (Silwood Park, Ascot, England): 221, antenna; 222, fore wing; 223, genitalia. FIGURES 224–226. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. l.[= G. intermedius(Boţoc) sensu Pricop (2010b)] Ƥ (224, 225— 1 km W of Hollern, Austria; 226—Ponte San Pietro, Lazio, Italy): 224, antenna; 225, dorsellum, propodeum, and metasoma; 226, wings. Pricop (2010b)considered G. intermediusto be a valid species based on several specimens of both sexes collected in Romaniabut these are not from Cluj County where the unspecified type locality (near Cluj-Napoca) of Lymaenon intermediuswas. According to the diagnosis and illustrations of the non-type specimens attributed to this species by Pricop (2010b), indeed these appear to fit well with the original description except for the markedly longer ovipositor (1.8× as long as mesotibia and slightly exserted beyond the gastral apex). According to Boţoc (1962), the ovipositor was short and not exserted in the syntypesof L. intermedius, as seen on the photograph of the female habitus (p. 109, her fig. 3). Collections should be made near Cluj-Napoca in June, and if a female that fits the original description of L. intermediusis found (it is important to have a short ovipositor!), a neotypeneeds to be designated meeting all the requirements of Article 75.3 ([ICZN] 1999). It is inadvisable to use any of the female specimens mentioned by Pricop (2010b)for such a designation, even though they might eventually turn out to be conspecific with L. intermedius, because they have markedly longer ovipositors and were collected significantly far away from the type locality. I have examined the following specimens that fit well the diagnosis and the illustrations of the form that was attributed by Pricop (2010b)to G. intermedius— AUSTRIA. LOWER AUSTRIA, 1 kmW of Hollern, 48°04’22’’N 16°52’37’’E, 150 m, 16.vi.2007, C. Thuróczy, S.V. Triapitsyn[ 2 Ƥ, UCRC]. FIGURES 227–229. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. l.[= G. intermedius(Boţoc) sensu Pricop (2010b)] Ƥ (Ponte San Pietro, Lazio, Italy): 227, antenna; 228, dorsellum and propodeum; 229, gaster. FIGURES 230–232. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. l.(paratypes of Lymaenon populiViggiani) Ƥ: 230, head and antennae; 231, antenna; 232, mesosoma. ITALY. LAZIO, Viterbo Prov., Ponte San Pietro, 42°31.669’N 11°36.353’E, 75 m, 10.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 3 Ƥ, UCRC]. RUSSIA. PRIMORSKIY KRAY, Ussuriyskiyrayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 28.viii–5.ix.1999, M.V. Michailovskaya[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. STAVROPOL’SKIY KRAY, Prietokskiy, V.V. Kostjukov: 14.vii.2003[ 4 Ƥ, UCRC]; 12.viii.2003[ 16 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]. SLOVAKIA.BRATISLAVA, Jurský Šúr Nature Reserve, 48°14’03’’N 17°12’47’’E, 133 m, 8.viii.2008, B.V. Brown(alder forest) [ 2 Ƥ, UCRC]. In these specimens, the ovipositor is 1.6–1.9× as long as mesotibia and slightly exserted beyond the gastral apex ( Figs 225, 229); other important features such as the antenna ( Figs 224, 227), the propodeal submedian carinae ( Fig. 228), and the wings ( Fig. 226) are identical to the ones in Pricop’s specimens from Romaniaand to the numerous specimens attributable to L. populifrom several European countries, as discussed below. Thus, the length of the ovipositor relative to the length of the mesotibia in both forms seems to be slightly overlapping while gradually increasing in various specimens between 1.0× and 1.6× (in some individuals attributable to L. populisensu Viggiani) to 1.6–1.9× (in the specimens attributable to G. intermediussensu Pricop). However, the significance of that is not clear, and I would abstain from resurrecting or sinking nominal species in the G. atercomplex based on such variable morphological features as the relative length of the ovipositor or presence/absence of mps on F3 and/or F6. FIGURES 233, 234. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. l.(paratypes of Lymaenon populiViggiani) Ƥ: 233, gaster; 234, wings. FIGURES 235, 236. Gonatocerus( Cosmocomoidea) ater s. l.(paratype of Lymaenon populiViggiani) 3: 235, antenna; 236, dorsellum and propodeum. Viggiani & Jesu (1988)did not accept the synonymy of Lymaenon populiunder G. aterby Matthews (1986)and they might be right unless the shape of the propodeal submedian carinae and the relative length of the ovipositor vary significantly in G. ater. This is quite possible because forms with somewhat different shapes of the propodeal submedian carinae and/or different relative lengths of the ovipositor do occur in Austria(near Hollern), Italy(Ponte San Pietro), and Russia(Fryazevo, Prietokskiy) in the same place and at the same or about the same time: unlike in the lectotypeof G. ater, the propodeal carinae in specimens of the type series of L. populiare more or less parallel to each other, not joining anteriorly at the posterior margin of the dorsellum and not extending (or sometimes almost extending) to it ( Figs 232, 236). In the holotypeand female paratypesof L. populi, the scape minus radicle ( Figs 230–231) is rather wide (2.0–2.1× as long as wide, very similar to that in G. ater s. str.), F3 and F6 bear 1 mps each and F5, F6 and F7 bear 2 mps each, the clava has 8 mps, and the ovipositor ( Fig. 233) is short (1.1–1.2× as long as mesotibia). Also illustrated here are the female wings ( Fig. 234) and the male antenna ( Fig. 235) of the paratypesof L. populias well as the antennae ( Figs 237–239), wings ( Fig. 240), body ( Fig. 241), propodeum ( Fig. 242), and metasoma ( Fig. 243) of the female, and the antenna ( Fig. 244), fore wing ( Fig. 245), and genitalia ( Fig. 246) of the male to illustrate variation of the key morphological features in the non-type specimens attributable to this form, of which I have examined the following material— AUSTRIA. LOWER AUSTRIA, 1 kmW of Hollern, 48°04’22’’N 16°52’37’’E, 150 m, 16.vi.2007, C. Thuróczy, S.V. Triapitsyn[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. GREECE.CENTRAL MACEDONIA, Lake Kerkini: BelesMts., 41°17’19.5’’N 23°12’18.4’’E, 550 m, 9–15.v.2007, G. Ramel[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. Kerkini Marsh, 41°13’32.8’’N 23°05’04.2’’E, 45 m, 11–17.iv.2007, G. Ramel[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. ITALY. LAZIO, Roma Prov.: Castelporziano Presidential Estate, Ponte Guidoni, 41°45.415’N 12°23.851’E, 80 m, 11.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. Near Maccarese Cemetary, 41°52.836’N 12°16.190’E, 40 m, 11.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. Viterbo Prov.: Ponte San Pietro, 42°31.669’N 11°36.353’E, 75 m, 10.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 5 Ƥ, 1 3, UCRC]. Roccaccia, 42°19.809’N 11°45.671’E, 125 m, 10.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 5 Ƥ, UCRC]. San Giovenale, 42°13.568’N 12°00.039’E, 225 m, 9.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. MOLISE, Campobasso Prov., 2.5 kmSW of Guardiaregia, 41°26.322’N 14°32.635’E, 860 m, 7.vi.2003, M. Bologna, J. Munro, A. Owen, J.D. Pinto[ 7 Ƥ, UCRC]. RUSSIA.KRASNODARSKIY KRAY, Krasnodar, 31.viii.2003, V.V. Kostjukov[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. MOSCOVSKAYA OBLAST’, Noginskiyrayon, Fryazevo, M.E. Tretiakov: 2–15.vi.2000[ 1 Ƥ, [ UCRC]; 21.vi.2001[ 1 Ƥ, [ UCRC]. PRIMORSKIY KRAY, Ussuriyskiyrayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 2–28.x.1999, M.V. Michailovskaya[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. STAVROPOL’SKIY KRAY: Achikulak, 26.viii.2002, V.V. Kostjukov[ 2 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]. Prietokskiy, V.V. Kostjukov: 14.vii.2003[ 3 Ƥ, UCRC, ZIN]; 12.viii.2003[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. UK. ENGLAND, East Sussex Co., Ashdown Forest, 28.vii.1982, J.S. Noyes[ 1 Ƥ, BMNH] (det. by M.J. Matthews). USA.CALIFORNIA, Orange Co., Irvine, Northwood Pointe, 33°43’18’’N 117°45’12’’W, 76 m, 7.viii.2011, S.V. Triapitsyn(on Lombardypoplar, Populusnigra) [ 1 Ƥ, UCRC]. NEW YORK, Ontario Co., Geneva, 42°52’46’’N 77°00’40’’W, 185 m(on Lombardypoplar, Populusnigra, roadside of County Road6): 3.viii.2010, S.V. Triapitsyn[ 4 Ƥ, 1 3, UCRC]; 23.ix.2010, S.V. Triapitsyn, G. Loeb[ 1 Ƥ, UCRC].In these specimens, some of which are at least tentatively attributable to Viggiani’s species, F3 and F6 of the female antenna sometimes may lack mps (usually in small specimens) or F 6 mayoccasionally bear 2 mps in large specimens, occasionally the propodeal submedian carinae may slightly curve towards each other anteriorly (but not joining nor extending to the anterior margin of the propodeum), and the ovipositor length varies from usually 1.0–1.3× to sometimes up to 1.6× as long as mesotibia. I found the same form ( Fig. 247) on Lombardy poplars (non-native to North America, of the European origin) in Geneva, New York, USA, which was apparently unintentionally introduced there with its likely host, Rhytidodus decimaquartus, along with G. oxypygus. Both species are also known from Italy( Viggiani 1969), apparently from the similar habitat. I also found this form on Lombardy poplars in southern California, USA; it differs from the native species G.( Cosmocomoidea) imparHuberby a shorter radicle and a relatively wider main body of the scape of the female antenna and a relatively wider hind wing.
Gonatocerus bifasciatusGirault ( Viggiani 2005: 65), who compared its male genitalia with those of “ G.prope populiViggiani” (two males from Williamsville, Wayne Co., Missouri, USA), is a nomen nudum ( Noyes 2012). Because the proportions of funicle segments and presence/absence of mps (particularly on F3 and F6) are quite variable in specimens that can be attributed more or less confidently to the already described species within G. atercomplex, in any possible combination with the shape of the propodeal submedian carinae and the length of the ovipositor relative to the length of the mesotibia (which is also quite variable), it is currently impossible to decide where the limits between the likely cryptic species are versus intraspecific variation. Until this complex is studied extensively using molecular methods and cross-breeding experiments (e.g., Triapitsyn et al.2008) to go along a thorough morphometrical analysis, and until more freshly collected, preferably reared from known hosts, specimens are obtained in or near the type localities of the nominal species comprising it, the synonymies proposed by Matthews (1986)are accepted (including that of L. intermedius) and I treat all the specimens discussed here as belonging to G. ater s. l.
3743914302
NHMW
121
122
120
121
1
1
lectotype
3743914306
1940-09-09
1941-08
1940-09-09
NHMW
G. pannonicus by Soyka
W. Soyka
Gonatocerus
121
122
1
1
holotype
3743914303
1968-06
DEZA, MHNG
Cavascasolle
Switzerland
G. Viggiani
Lymaenon
Coll. O. I. L. B.
121
122
12
2
7
Geneva
holotype
3743914307
1941-06-01
1942-05-18
1941-06-01
ISNB
122
123
Heverle
121
122
1944
1
1943
holotype
3743916322
2008-10-20
CUPC
J. Hajek
Czech Republic
690
50.240345
Kacerov Nature Reserve
1
16.385317
Orlicke Mountains
122
123
2
1
lectotype
3743916358
[151,1436,1576,1601]
2000-05-01
2000-05-18
2000-05-01
UCRC
Russia
Fryazevo, M. E. Tretiakov
Noginskiy
122
123
1
1
3743916313
[151,438,1613,1637]
2002-06-02
UCRC
122
123
1
1
3743916381
[450,744,1613,1637]
2002-07-09
UCRC
122
123
1
1
3743916304
2001-05-05
2001-05-16
2001-05-05
UCRC, ZIN
E. Ya. Shuvakhina
Pushkino
Pushkinskiy
122
123
2
2
3743916308
2001-07-21
CAS
D. J. Bennett & T. Anderson
Iceland
Sokol
122
123
1
1
3743916343
2000-05-26
2000-05-27
2000-05-26
UCRC
M. E. Tretiakov
Talinka
Inzhavinskiy
122
123
1
3743916340
1949-05-28
1994-06-11
1949-05-28
CNCI, MMUE
J. S. Noyes & W. D. Hincks
United Kingdom
Berkshire Co.
Silwood Park
Ascot
122
123
1
1
3743916324
1994-08-04
CNCI
J. S. Noyes
United Kingdom
Bridgend Co.
Kenfig Pool National Nature Reserve
Borough
122
123
1
3743916309
1990-04-27
1990-05-11
1990-04-27
LIEGE, ISNB
R. Detry
Belgium
Antheit
Wanze
122
123
1
1
3743916311
1992-07-26
1992-08-02
1992-07-26
ISNB
P. Dessart
Belgium
Waterloo
122
123
1
1
3743916349
1962-08-06
NHMW
M. Boness
Germany
Cologne
122
123
3
3
NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA
3743916332
[416,985,2008,2032]
1963-07-03
NHMW
M. Boness
Leverkusen
122
123
1
1
3743916350
2007-04-11
2007-04-17
2007-04-11
UCRC
G. Ramel
Greece
45
123
124
41.225777
Kerkini Marsh
1
23.084501
Lake Kerkini
122
123
1
1
3743916375
[151,1436,187,212]
2001-08-19
2001-08-20
2001-08-19
KRAY, UCRC
V. V. Kostjukov
Russia
Krasnodar
123
124
1
Krasnodar
3743916368
[151,1144,223,248]
1978-08-18
ZIN
V. A. Trjapitzin
Sivkovo
123
124
1
1
3743916305
1999-06-11
1999-06-12
1999-06-11
KRAY, UCRC
Gornotayozhnoye, M. V. Michailovskaya
Ussuriyskiy
123
124
1
1
3743916352
1999-06-23
1999-06-24
1999-06-23
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916374
[253,566,295,319]
1999-07-01
1999-07-02
1999-07-01
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916362
[575,976,295,320]
1999-07-11
1999-07-14
1999-07-11
UCRC
123
124
2
2
3743916319
[985,1436,295,319]
1999-07-24
1999-08-01
1999-07-24
IBPV, UCRC
123
124
2
2
3743916330
[151,519,332,356]
1999-07-27
1999-08-01
1999-07-27
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916348
[527,844,332,356]
1999-08-04
1999-08-05
1999-08-04
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916333
[852,1184,332,356]
1999-08-05
1999-08-11
1999-08-05
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916361
1999-08-12
1999-08-17
1999-08-12
UCRC, ZIN
123
124
2
2
3743916336
[313,658,367,391]
1999-08-22
1999-08-28
1999-08-22
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916320
[666,1073,367,391]
1999-08
IBPV, UCRC, ZIN
123
124
4
4
3743916318
[1082,1386,367,392]
1999-08
1999-09-31
1999-08
UCRC
123
124
1
3743916310
1999-09-10
1999-09-15
1999-09-10
UCRC
123
124
3
3
3743916321
[458,797,404,428]
1999-09-25
1999-09-26
1999-09-25
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916353
[808,1069,404,428]
1999-09
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916378
[1080,1397,404,428]
1999-10-08
1999-10-11
1999-10-08
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916356
2000-07-01
2000-07-10
2000-07-01
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916370
[469,817,439,463]
2000-07-10
2000-07-20
2000-07-10
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916345
[828,1250,439,463]
2000-08-21
2000-08-26
2000-08-21
UCRC, ZIN
123
124
2
2
3743916380
2000-08
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916303
[262,1436,476,500]
2001-08-16
CAS
Iceland
Sokol
Sokol
123
124
1
3743916301
[151,1136,511,536]
2002-08-29
KRAY, UCRC
V. V. Kostjukov
Prietokskiy
123
124
1
1
3743916373
[1145,1436,511,535]
2003-08-07
UCRC
123
124
4
4
3743916328
[151,450,548,572]
2003-08-12
UCRC
123
124
1
1
3743916344
[456,755,548,572]
2003-08-14
UCRC
123
124
3
3
3743916346
1948-07-06
MMUE
H. Britten
United Kingdom
Cheshire Co.
Middlewood
123
124
1
1
3743916376
1984-08-26
BMNH
J. S. Noyes
Surrey Co.
M. J. Matthews
Leith Hill
Dorking
123
124
1
1
3743916369
1986-09-21
CNCI
Country
White Downs
123
124
1
1
3743916347
on minuten pins inserted in the same small balsa wood piece on a pin labeled
MHNG
Germany
GERMANY
123
124
2
2
3743916314
2007-06-16
LOWER, UCRC
C. Thuroczy & S. V. Triapitsyn
Austria
150
48.072777
Hollern
18
16.876945
129
130
2
2
3743916316
2003-06-10
LAZIO, UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
Italy
75
42.527817
Ponte San Pietro
1
11.605884
Viterbo Prov
130
131
3
3
3743916315
1999-08-28
1999-09-05
1999-08-28
UCRC
M. V. Michailovskaya
Russia
Gornotayozhnoye
Ussuriyskiy
130
131
1
1
PRIMORSKIY KRAY
3743916326
2003-07-14
2003-08-12
2003-07-14
KRAY, UCRC, ZIN
V. V. Kostjukov
131
132
Prietokskiy
130
131
20
20
3743916363
2008-08-08
UCRC
B. V. Brown
Slovakia
133
48.234165
Jursky Sur Nature Reserve
18
17.213057
131
132
2
2
3743916341
2007-06-16
LOWER, UCRC
C. Thuroczy & S. V. Triapitsyn
Austria
150
48.072777
Hollern
18
16.876945
Hollern
132
133
1
1
3743916379
2007-05-09
2007-05-15
2007-05-09
UCRC
G. Ramel
Greece
550
41.28875
Lake Kerkini
1
23.205112
132
133
1
1
3743916366
2007-04-11
2007-04-17
2007-04-11
UCRC
G. Ramel
45
41.225777
Kerkini Marsh
1
23.084501
132
133
1
1
3743916323
2003-06-11
LAZIO, UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
Italy
80
41.756916
Castelporziano Presidential Estate
1
12.397516
Roma Prov
132
133
1
1
3743916306
2003-06-11
UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
40
41.8806
Near Maccarese Cemetary
1
12.269834
132
133
1
1
3743916302
2003-06-10
UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
75
42.527817
Ponte San Pietro
1
11.605884
Viterbo Prov
132
133
5
5
3743916325
2003-06-10
UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
125
42.33015
Roccaccia
1
11.761184
132
133
5
5
3743916312
2003-06-09
UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
225
42.22613
San Giovenale
1
12.00065
132
133
1
1
3743916372
2003-06-07
UCRC
M. Bologna & J. Munro & A. Owen & J. D. Pinto
860
41.4387
Guardiaregia
1
14.543917
Campobasso Prov
132
133
7
7
3743916351
[151,1216,1595,1620]
2003-08-31
KRAY, UCRC
V. V. Kostjukov
Russia
Krasnodar
133
134
1
1
Krasnodar
3743916331
2000-06-02
2000-06-15
2000-06-02
UCRC
Fryazevo, M. E. Tretiakov
Noginskiy
133
134
1
1
3743916307
[1137,1436,1630,1654]
2001-06-21
UCRC
133
134
1
1
3743916365
[151,1437,1664,1689]
1999-10-02
1999-10-28
1999-10-02
UCRC
M. V. Michailovskaya
Gornotayozhnoye
Ussuriyskiy
133
134
1
1
PRIMORSKIY KRAY
3743916329
[151,1223,1699,1724]
2002-08-26
KRAY, UCRC, ZIN
V. V. Kostjukov
Achikulak
133
134
2
2
3743916382
2003-07-14
UCRC, ZIN
V. V. Kostjukov
Prietokskiy
Prietokskiy
133
134
3
3
3743916342
[635,930,1734,1758]
2003-08-12
UCRC
133
134
1
1
3743916337
1982-07-28
BMNH
J. S. Noyes & M. J. Matthews
United Kingdom
East Sussex Co.
Ashdown Forest
133
134
1
1
3743916338
2011-08-07
UCRC
S. V. Triapitsyn
United States of America
Orange Co.
76
33.72167
Northwood Pointe
19
-117.753334
Irvine
133
134
1
1
3743916355
2010-08-03
NEW, YORK, UCRC
S. V. Triapitsyn
Ontario Co.
185
42.879444
Populus
19
-77.01111
Lombardy
133
134
4
4
Geneva
3743916359
2010-09-23
UCRC
S. V. Triapitsyn & G. Loeb
133
134
1
1