Basic anatomy of species of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil Fernandes, Maurício Romulo Pimenta, Alexandre Dias European Journal of Taxonomy 2019 2019-04-17 517 1 60 YVFX (C. B. Adams, 1850) C. B. Adams 1850 [519,1068,1380,1407] Gastropoda Triphoridae Cosmotriphora Animalia 14 15 Mollusca species melanura   Figs 2C, 7–8    Material examined   BRAZIL–  Espírito Santo State• [1, d] spec.; Ilha Escalvada, Guarapari; 20°42´00″ S, 40°24´28″ W;  10–15 mdepth;  12 Dec. 2014;  M. R. Fernandesand  L. S. Souzaleg.;  MNRJ33980. –   Rio de Janeiro State• [3, 2 d] specs; Campos Basin; 22°42´ S, 40°40´ W; 2006;  MNRJ18750• [3, 2 d] specs; same data as for preceding;  MNRJ33138.    Description of basic anatomy EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY. Body mainly white, but a distinct, sinuous, black stripe occupies the upper-mid portion of the whorl during a little less than half whorl of length, one to two whorls posteriorly to the operculum; roof of mantle cavity can be yellowish in fresh specimens. OPERCULUM. Yellowish, ovate-elliptical, thin, semi-transparent, membranous, poorly distinct whorls, nucleussubcentral, dislocated 14% to 23% from center toward margin; denticles in the inner border of operculum; diameter of operculum exceeds diameter of opercular pouch in 22% to 30%. JAW. Wing-shaped; outer side with scales rectangular, rectangular-bilobed or acute-lanceolate; scales with micro-pores up to 260 nmin diameter; inner side with hexagonal scales, surface smooth; outer side with rectangular scales 12.1–12.3 µmlong, 2.7–2.9 µmwide, ratio length/width 4.2–4.4, acutelanceolate scales 21.0– 26.7 µmlong, 6.9–7.9 µmwide, ratio length/width 3.0–3.7; scales of inner side 13.7–17.3 µmlong, 3.9–5.0 µm wide, ratio length/width 2.9–3.8. RADULA. Formula not discernible because of overcrowded outer marginal teeth; central and lateral teeth head-fork shaped with four triangular cusps, inner ones 1.3–1.6× more elongated than outer ones; inner marginal teeth (i.e., M1 to M5) with three cusps, width of teeth gradually decreasing towards outer marginal teeth, median cusp more prominent and elongated, 1.2–2.1× longer than outer cusps, becoming increasingly elongated towards outer marginal teeth; outer marginal teeth (i.e., after M6) with two elongated and filiform cusps, somewhat hook-shaped, inner cusp much shorter (usually 2.2–2.9× shorter than outer cusp, but even 4.5–5.0× shorter in teeth under development); central tooth 2.9–3.5 µmwide, lateral teeth 2.9–3.6 µmwide, inner marginal teeth 1.7–2.7 µmwide, outer marginal teeth 6.0– 10.6 µmlong.    Remarks  Rolán & Fernández-Garcés ( 1994)described the external morphology of  C. melanuraas having numerous white/yellowish spots in the anterior portion of the body, which was not observed in the present study probably due to a faint coloration after a long storage in ethanol. However, all specimens had a distinct and previously unnoticed black stripe situated at one to two whorls posteriorly to the operculum ( Fig. 7A–B), not present in any other triphorid studied so far; this stripe is continuous and does not seem to be related to fecal pellets. Opercula of specimens from Brazil( Fig. 7C–D) are identical to those of Caribbean specimens ( Bouchet 1985: fig. 2).   Fig. 7.  Cosmotriphora melanura(C.B. Adams, 1850). A, E, G. MNRJ 33138. B–D, F. MNRJ 18750. A–B. External morphology, different specimens. C–D. Operculum. E–G. Jaw, outer (E–F) and inner (G) sides. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–D = 100 µm; E, G = 5 µm; F = 2 µm.   Fig. 8.  Cosmotriphora melanura(C.B. Adams, 1850). A–G. Radula (MNRJ 18750). Scale bars: A = 10 µm; B–G = 5 µm. The radula of specimens from Brazil( Fig. 8) is almost identical to that of Caribbean specimens ( Bouchet 1985; Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 1994), with the exception that the central tooth of Brazilian specimens is more similar to the lateral teeth of Caribbean ones (outer cusps considerably shorter than inner ones), but lateral teeth of Brazilian specimens are more similar to the central tooth of Caribbean ones (outer cusps not so shorter than inner ones). Although not illustrated, Bouchet ( 1985)noted differences in the marginal teeth of a juvenile from the eastern Atlantic when compared to the pattern seen in adults from the western Atlantic, warning for the necessity of fine radular comparisons from adult specimens from both sides of the Atlantic. After examining several specimens from Cuba(Caribbean) and Ghana(eastern Atlantic), Rolán & Fernández-Garcés ( 1994)concluded that there were no significant differences in their radulae, despite not having illustrated those from the eastern Atlantic. 2236664064 2014-12-12 MNRJ M. R. Fernandes & L. S. Souza Brazil State 13 -20.7 Guarapari 21 -40.40778 Ilha Escalvada 14 15 MNRJ 33980 1 Espirito Santo 2236664047 MNRJ Brazil State -22.7 Campos Basin 1258 -40.666668 14 15 MNRJ 18750 1 Rio de Janeiro 2236664082 MNRJ Brazil State -22.7 Campos Basin 1258 -40.666668 14 15 MNRJ 33138 1 Rio de Janeiro