The genus Thelepus Leuckart, 1849 (Annelida, Thelepodidae) in Brazil, with a redescription of the holotype of T. setosus (Quatrefages, 1866) Carrerette, Orlemir Nogueira, João Miguel De Matos Hutchings, Pat Zootaxa 2017 4250 6 587 599 56875 [151,442,152,178] Polychaeta Terebellidae Thelepus Animalia Terebellida 4 591 Annelida species megalabiatum sp. nov.    Thelepuscf. setosus. (Non Quatrefages) Alves 2008: p. 81–87, figs 26–27.      Typeseries. Atlantic Ocean, southeastern Brazil, state of Rio de Janeiro, Campos Basin, project ‘HABITATS – Environmentalheterogeneity in the Campos Basin’: Holotype(  MZUSP3017): 21°27'56.300"S 40°56'28.755"W,  15 mdeep, in sand, coll.  20 Jul. 2009; paratypes 1–4 (MZUSP 3018, 3019, 3043, 3044, respectively): 22°45'44.583"S 41°45'39.316"W, 48.2 mdeep, in sand, coll. 16 Jul. 2009.  Additional material examined.Project 'BIOTA/FAPESP/Benthic marine biodiversity in the state of São Paulo’: 23°25’S 44°46’W, 35 mdeep, in sand, coll. 10 Jun 2001, 1 spec. Data on the range of variation of numerical characters within the type series is provided in Table 1.   Description.All specimens incomplete, with 51–78 (78) segments, 40–113 (60) mm long, 4–7 mm(7) wide. Preserved body uniformly beige to yellowish, without distinct patterns of pigmentation ( Fig. 3A–I). Transverse prostomium attached to dorsal surface of upper lip; basal part with two well separated irregular rows of eyespots, both continuous throughout, eyespots more separated from each other mid-dorsally ( Fig. 3D–H); distal part of prostomium low, restricted to base of upper lip ( Fig. 3C, F, H), thick and deeply grooved buccal tentacles, reaching around segment 10 if directed posteriorly (missing in holotype). Peristomium restricted to lips, not continuing dorsally; upper lip short and thick, hood-like, much wider than long ( Fig. 3A–H); large lower lip, swollen, as trapezoidal, distally rounded lobe extending posteriorly until segment 3 ( Fig. 3A, F–H). Anterior body highly glandular ventrally, corrugated and crenulate until segments 26–35 (31), progressively less marked and shorter from segments 16–17 ( Fig. 3A, D, F–H); segment 1 narrow all around, covered by lower lip mid-ventrally ( Fig. 3A, C, F–H); segments 2–7 progressively longer, with thickened, raised anterior margins laterally and ventrally, forming continuous crests across ventrum ( Fig. 3A, D–H); following anterior segments about same size. Three pairs of branchiae, on segments 2–4, segment 2 with 27–42 (35) branchial filaments on each side, segment 3 with 22–26 (25) filaments, segment 4 with 17–22 (18) filaments; origin of filaments of segment 2 extending slightly laterally to the level of notopodia, those of following segments originating dorsally to notopodia;   FIGURE 3.  Thelepus megalabiatum  n. sp.(Holotype, MZUSP 3017), (A–B, D–E). Anterior end, ventral, dorsal, right and left lateral views, respectively; (C, F–I). Close ups, anterior end in dorsal, ventral, right and left lateral views, and of the termination of notopodia, respectively, pointing to last notopodia and the difference between anterior and posterior neuropodia in I. Numbers refer to the segments; bc = branchial cushions; e = eyespots; g = glandular ventral areas; ll = lower lip; no = notopodia; an = anterior (= ‘thoracic’) neuropodia; pn = posterior (‘abdominal’) neuropodia; P = basal part of prostomium; po = pharyngeal organ; ul = upper lip; * distal part of prostomium. Scale bars: A–B, D–E, G–H = 1 mm; C, F, I = 0.5 mm.   FIGURE 4.  Thelepus megalabiatum  n. sp.(Holotype, MZUSP 3017), (A–C). Notochaetae, segments 6 and 35 (2), respectively. (D–G). uncini, segments 7, 25 (2) and 47, respectively. b = base of uncinus; c = crest with secondary rows of teeth; db = dorsal button; h = heel; mf = main fang; p = prow. Scale bars: A–C = 60 µm; D = 50 µm; E = 10 µm; F–G = 20 µm. filaments of either side within pairs separated by wide, progressively larger mid-dorsal gap; branchial filaments long and thin, reaching in length about half of body width at corresponding segment, originating from swollen, apparently glandular areas ( Fig. 3B–E, G–H). Notopodia from segment 3 until the segments 44–61+ (44), progressively longer and inserted more laterally on segments 3–4; notopodia progressively shorter from mid-body, last pairs well developed ( Fig. 3B–I); narrowly-winged notochaetae in both rows, well marked difference in length between rows on anterior notopodia, less marked posteriorly, wings only present on distal halves of chaetae, slender, lanceolate, slightly wider basally ( Fig. 4A–C). Neuropodia as fleshy ridges on anterior body, progressively wider until termination of mid-ventral glandular areas, accompanying narrowing of glandular areas; after termination of glandular areas, neuropodia progressively narrower and more raised, and as narrow pinnules after notopodia terminate ( Fig. 3A–B, D–I), internal support rods only present after notopodia terminate; uncini with terminal dorsal button, remarkably short prow, as almost inconspicuous triangular knob, crest with 2 rows of secondary teeth, basal row with 2 large teeth, distal row with single tiny tooth in between teeth of first row, and base strongly convex ( Fig. 4D–G). Small nephridial and genital papillae on segments 4–7, posterior to bases of notopodia and between parapodial lobes. Pygidium unknown.   TABLE 2. Comparison between the most important numerical characters of the species of  Thelepusmost similar to  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.and  T. brevitori  n. sp.Sources: Hutchings & Glasby (1987); Londoño-Mesa (2009); Capa & Hutchings (2006); characters of  T. setosusexamined directly from type-material. ;   Remarks.Members of  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.have been identified by previous authors as  T. setosusor  T.cf. setosus( Alves 2008, Amaral et al.2013), but they differ from the holotypeof  T. setosus, after the redescription above, in the morphology of branchiae and uncini, as well as in the shape of anterior segments and position of neuropodial tori. The holotypeof  T. setosushas fewer branchial filaments ( Table 2) and they originate directly from the body wall, leaving very narrow gap between filaments of either side of pairs, while members of  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.have more branchial filaments, originating from swollen cushions, with wide mid-dorsal gap between filaments within pairs (compare our Figs 1B–C, E–G and 3B–E, G–H). The uncini are very similar between members of these species, but the holotypeof  T. setosushas a characteristic medial indentation at base, which is not found among members of  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.In addition, while the Brazilian species present high ventral crests on anterior segments and neuropodia varying in width, according to the width of the mid-ventral glandular areas, the holotypeof  T. setosushas much lower crests on anterior segments and neuropodia of uniform width. As discussed above, specimens from several other localities around the world were first identified as  T. setosusand then assigned to other species, in most cases new ones. These species are  T. haitiensis Treadwell, 1931,  T. verrilli( Treadwell, 1911)and  T. fraggleorum Capa & Hutchings, 2006, from the Caribbean, and  T. extensus Hutchings & Glasby, 1987, from Australia. Among these,  T. fraggleorum,  T. verrilliand  T. extensusdiffer from the new species in regards to the numbers of both branchial filaments and pairs of notopodia (see Table 2).  Thelepus haitiensisshares with  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.similar number of branchial filaments and rows of secondary teeth of uncini, but members of  T. haitiensisdo not have eyespots and present only up to 46 pairs of notopodia ( Table 2), while members of the Brazilian species have two well developed rows of eyespots and notopodia extending until segments 44–61+. In addition, members of  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.have high ventral crests on segments 2–7, which are absent in  T. haitiensis(compare Fig. 3A–B, D–E, G–H with Londoño-Mesa 2009, fig. 24A–E, p. 81). Finally,  T. megalabiatum  n. sp.,differs from the other species described herein in the size of the specimens, the characteristic remarkably large lower lip, numbers of both branchial filaments and pairs of notopodia, as well as in the shape of ventral glandular areas and morphology of the uncini (see below).   Etymology.We attribute the epithet “  megalabiatum” to this taxon in reference to the large size of lower lip, projecting as a ventral lobe reaching segment 3.     Typelocality. Atlantic Ocean, Southeastern Brazil, state of Rio de Janeiro, Campos Basin: 21°27'56.300"S 40°56'28.755"W,  15 mdeep, in sand. 1455758450 2009-07-20 MZUSP Brazil Type 15 -21.46564 Campos Basin 1 -40.941322 Atlantic Ocean 4 591 MZUSP 3017 2 Rio de Janeiro holotype 1455758452 Brazil 15 -21.46564 Campos Basin 1 -40.941322 Atlantic Ocean 8 595 1 Rio de Janeiro holotype