Lectotypification of 16 names in Rubus subg. Idaeobatus, 12 names in R. subg. Malachobatus, and 1 name in R. subg. Chamaebatus (Rosaceae) Idrees, Muhammad Zhang, Zhiyong Phytotaxa 2022 2022-08-19 559 1 13 24 6X9MC Leveille (1912: 33) H. Leveille 33 1912 [217,690,770,797] Magnoliopsida Rosaceae Rubus Plantae Rosales 2 15 Tracheophyta species croceacanthus   Type(  lectotypedesignated here):—  SOUTH KOREA. Corée: Quelpaert, dans les haies a Setchimeri,  May 1911,  T. Taquet5554(barcode E00010581!, isolectotypes: P00755222!, P00755224!). [Image available at https://data.rbge. org.uk/herb/E00010581].  Note:— Léveillé (1912)mentioned the following locality: “ Corée, Quelpaert, dans les haies a Setchimeri, mai 1911( Taquet 5554, 5555, 5556, 5557)” in the protologue when he describing  Rubus croceacanthus, but did not indicate the holotypespecimen. In addition, no author has designated a lectotype, even inadvertently (Art. 7.11 of ICN). According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979), all of the Léveillé’s type specimens have been purchased by E in 1919. We locate four collections, one of them “ Taquet 5554” deposited in E (barcode 00010581), and P (barcode 00755222 and 00755224), the specimen “ Taquet 5555” in E (barcode 00313545), the specimen “ Taquet 5556” in E (barcode 00313544), and the specimen “ Taquet 5557” in E (barcode 00313543); all these collections should be regarded as syntypes(Art. 9.6 of ICN). All the specimens in E bear the information “ Syntype  Rubus croceacanthusH. Léveillé”, and it is necessary to select one of them as the lectotype(Art. 9.12 of ICN). Hence, we designate the blooming specimen of“ T. Taquet 5554” in E (barcode 00010581) as the lectotypesince it is morphological complete with the presence of stem, leaves, inflorescence and flower that fully correspond with the protologue. 3890546318 1911-05 T. Taquet South Korea Setchimeri Coree Quelpaert 2 15 1