Chaudoir, 1860 : 52 Bates, 1881 : 16 Fleutiaux 1892 : 123 Rivalier 1969 : 197 Horn 1893 : 343 Johnson 1996 : 37 Wiesner 1992 : 78 Taxonomic and nomenclatorial revision within the Neotropical genera of the subtribe Odontocheilina W. Horn in a new sense — 18. Six Mexican and Central American species related to Odontocheila mexicana Laporte de Castelnau and O. ignita Chaudoir, with a description of O. potosiana sp. nov. Moravec, Jiří Brzoska, David Huber, Ronald Zootaxa 2017 4231 4 451 499 48PKK Chaudoir, 1860 Chaudoir 1860 [151,589,367,394] Insecta Carabidae Odontocheila Animalia Coleoptera 31 482 Arthropoda species ignita     Odontochila ignita  Chaudoir, 1860: 52(320).   Type locality.“Mexique”.     Odontocheila cinctula  Bates, 1881: 16(synonymy by Horn 1904). Type locality.Guatemala: Zapote.    Odontochila ignita:  Fleutiaux 1892: 123;  Rivalier 1969: 197, 208, 209.  Odontochila cinctula:  Horn 1893: 343.    Odontocheila cinctula:  Johnson 1996: 37, 42; 2000: 13.  Odontocheila ignita:  Wiesner 1992: 78.   Type materialof  O. ignitaChaudoir.Holotype (by monotypy) ♂ in MNHN, labelled: “ ignita Chaud., Mexique, 59. C. Reiche” [ochraceous label with black frame, handwritten]; “Muséum Paris, Coll. Chaudoir, 1874” [greenish, printed]; “Type” [red, printed]; “Revision Jiří Moravec 2012: Holotype (by monotypy), Odontochila ignita Chaudoir, 1860” [red, printed].  Note: the holotypelacks its abdomen, as also mentioned by Chaudoir (1860)in the original description.  Type materialof  O. cinctulaBates.Lectotype (designated here),  ♂in BMNHlabelled: “  Type” [circular with red border, printed] // “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” // “B. C. A., Coll., I(1). / Odontocheila cinctula” [printed] // “ Odontocheila/ cinctula/ Bates” [handwritten] // “ Lectotype ♂/ Odontocheila/ cinctula Bts./ by Erwin76” [printed/handwritten] // “ The lectotypelabel / by Erwinis invalid / (unpublished)” [printed]; “ Lectotype/ Odontocheila cinctula Bates, 1881/ design. Jiří Moravec2012” [red, printed]. Paralectotypes. 4 ♂♂,  3 ♀♀in MNHN: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” [printed] // “ H.W.Bates/ Biol.  Cent.Amer” [printed] // “Muséum Paris / 1952 / Coll. R.Oberthür” [greenish, printed] // “ Odontocheila/ cinctula/ Bates” [(only in ♂), handwritten]. 2 ♀♀ in MNHN [Coll. Fleutiaux] with same labels. 1 ♂ in SDEI,  3 ♀♀in MFNB: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” // “ Mus. Berolin” [handwritten]; “  Type! / Coll. W.Horn / DEI Eberswalde” [printed] // “ Syntypus” [red, printed] // “( cinctula/ Bat.)” [greenish with black border, handwritten]. // “ Odontocheila ignita cinctula/ Bates Type(DEI-Eberswalde / borrowed by D. L. Pearson/  23 Oct.1996(drawer # 58)” [printed].  1 ♂in SDEI“ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” // “ Musée de Belgique” [printed] // “ Coll. W.Horn / DEI Eberswalde” [printed].  1 ♀in IRSNB: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” [printed] // “see. W. Horn Coll. Cat./ Junk/86, 1926, p. 119: / Odontocheila/ ignita Chaud.” // “ O. cinctula Bts./ det. H.W. Bates” [handwritten].  1 ♂in BMNH: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” [printed] // “ Odontocheila/ cinctula/ Bates” [handwritten] // “B. C. A., Coll., I(1). / Odontocheila/ cinctula” [handwritten]. 6 ♀♀ in BMNH with same first three labels.  1 ♂in BMNHwith same first three labels and: “ Odontochila/ ignita/ Chaudoir/ det. R.R. Murray‘79”.  1 ♂in BMNH: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” // “Co- / type” [circular with yellow border, printed] // “B. C. A., Coll., I(1). / Odont.: / secedens Steinh.[sic!]: / cinctula Bat.”. All paralectotypeslabelled: “ Revision Jiří Moravec2012 [2013 or 2014 respectively]: “ Paralectotype, Odontocheila cinctula Bates, 1881” [red, printed].   Other material examined. Historical data. 1 ♂in SDEI: “ Guatemala” // “ex Museo/ H.W. Bates/ 1892”.  1 ♀in BMNH[standing as  Odontocheila chrysisFabricius]: “ Zapote/ Guatemala/ G. C. Champion” // “Odont. / secedens Steinh.[sic!].  1 ♀in BMNH: “ San Isidro/  1600 ft/ Champion” // “ B.C.A. Coll.I. (1) / Odontocheila cinctula”.  1♂in MNHN: “ Venezuela” [sic!] // “ Muséum Paris, Coll. Chaudoir, 1874” // “1543 / Rivalier” [referring to the separately mounted aedeagus by Rivalier]. Otherdata.  1 ♀in MNHN: “ Guatemala”. // “ Odontocheila/ cinctula Bates”. 1 ♂,  1♀in MFNB: “ Mexico/ Soconusco/  8.VII./ Purpus S.V.”. Recentdata. 3 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ in DBCN,  1 ♂in CCJM: “ Mexico—Chiapas,  210 m/  13 kmN Mapastepek/ 15°32.7´N; 92°52.9´W” / D. Brzoska 1- VI-209”. 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ in DBCN,  2 ♂♂in CCJM: “ Mexico—Chiapas/ Union Juarez Rd/ Km  15, 735 m/ 15°02.4´Ń; 92°07.7´W / D. Brzoska 31-V-2009”. 1 ♂,  1 ♀in DBCN: “ Mexico, Chiapas/ Rd. to Motozintla, Km32, (NE- Huixtla) / D. Brzoska  9-VI-1999” 1 ♂in DBCN: ibid., except for: “Hy. 211, KM 32, ( S. Motozintla) / D.   Brzoska  30-V- 2009”.  4 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀in DBCN, 1 ♂, 1 ♀in CCJM: “ Guatemala: / Quezaltenango[Quezaltenango] / Rd. 3 / km 216—W—Colomba / 14°42.2´N, 91°46.7´W,  900 m/ D. Brzoska  24-V-2004”.  2 ♂♂, 1 ♀in RLHC: “ Mex: Chiapas/ KM15 on road to / Union Juarez/  31.V.2009/ N of Cacahoatàn// R.L. Huber/ 1502.4’N / 9207.9’W / elev  735m”.  2 ♂♂in RLHC: “ Guatemala: Quezaltenango/ W of Colomba/  24.V.2004/ R.L. Huber” / / “ 14°42.18’N, 91°46.74’W/ elev  900m, km 216 on / Hwy3, Finca Horizonte”.  2 ♂♂, 1 ♀in WJCM: “ Chiapas, Mexico/ 3.5 mi. n. of Belisario Dominguez/  23.VI.1994, Walter N. Johnsoncoll.” 1 ♂, 1 ♀in WJCM: “ Bosque El Imposible/ Depto.  Ahuachapan/ El Salvador/  VI 19 1979// RD Cave/ colr”.   Differential diagnosis.  O. ignitapossesses similar, dense elytral sculpture of commonly anastomosing punctures as in  O. iodopleura,  O. tawahkaand  O. exilis.However, males of  O. ignitaimmediately differ in having much wider, capitate apex of their aedeagi, in contrast to much narrower apex of the aedeagi in  O. iodopleuraand  O. tawahka(and also in  O. mexicanaand  O. potosiana  sp. nov.); the male labrum in  O. ignitais mostly notably shorter than in males of  O. iodopleuraand  O. tawahka; females of  O. ignitacan be distinguished from  O. iodopleuraand  O. tawahkaby their narrower pronotal disc with bright reddish sublateral areas, and more irregular and finer surface sculpture (in contrast to the pronotal disc in  O. iodopleuraand  O. tawahka, which is much wider and covered with generally coarser and more regular and continuous rugae, particularly along the median line). Nevertheless, very rarely adults of  O. ignitapossess wider pronotal disc and such females may cause a confusion with females of  O. iodopleurawhich, apart from the above mentioned difference in the surface sculpture of the pronotal disc, differ in having more distinctly multicoloured elytra.   O. exilisis externally very similar, but can be distinguished from  O. ignitaby generally larger size, generally smaller white elytral maculae, and almost subacute elytral apices in both sexes. In addition, females of  O. exilishave much darker mandibles and legs, and usually even denser elytral punctation of which the narrow intervals form almost reticulate ornamentation on the elytral disc. Males of  O. exilisare clearly recognizable by the differently shaped apex of their aedeagi ( Figs 197–207), in contrast to the capitate apex of the aedeagi in  O. ignita( Figs 161–176); moreover, the labrum in  O. exilisis slightly but notably longer.    O. potosiana  sp. nov., apart from the very different, much narrower apex of the aedeagus, clearly differs from  O. ignitain having much more regular elytral punctation and an even much finer surface sculpture on its pronotal disc which is, moreover, bright reddish-cupreous in the middle.   O. mexicanaimmediately differs in having its pronotal disc notably subglobose and almost smooth and polished.  Redescription. Body ( Figs 132–133, 141–142) medium-sized, 8.80–10.2 (LT 9.70) mm long, 2.70–3.20 (LT 2.80) mm wide, females mostly larger than males. Head ( Figs 134, 143–144) with notably pronounced eyes, large, as wide as body or slightly smaller, 2.60–3.05 mmwide, all head portions glabrous. Frons, vertex and clypeus basically as in  O. iodopleurawith the same pattern of the striae and rugae on the surface of vertex, but vertex moderately convex in middle, and the striae and rugae somewhat coarser and deeper, and the lateral edges above the supraantennal plates very short and indistinct as formed by much smaller impression at the apices of the supraantennal plates. Genae as in  O. mexicana, but mostly shallowly parallel-striate also on median and anterior area. Labrum 4-setose; distinctly bicoloured; male labrum ( Figs 135–137, 145–146) with shape of teeth basically as in  O. mexicana(anterior margin either shallowly emarginate in middle, or with either indicated or small median tooth), rather short, length 0.60–0.65 mm, width 1.10–1.15 mm, female labrum ( Figs 138–139, 147) 1.00– 1.15 mmlong, 1.15–1.30 mmwide, with prominent, acutely tridentate median lobe with protruding median tooth. Mandibles ( Figs 134, 143–144) metallic-black (faded to brown in old specimens), with distinct, ivory-yellow lateral stripe (more extended in male), normally shaped (as in  O. mexicana). Palpi ( Figs 134, 143–144) shaped as in  O. mexicana, ivory-yellow to ochre-testaceous, terminal palpomeres in both labial and maxillary palpi metallic black; penultimate palpomeres of maxillary palpi variably yellow-ochre to brownish-darkened, or black. Antennae ( Figs 132–134, 141–144) rather short, in male slightly reaching elytral half, in female shorter, barely reaching elytral third; scape with only apical seta, coloration of scape and antennomeres 2–4 ( Figs 134, 143–144) as in  O. iodopleura. Thorax. Pronotum ( Figs 157–160) glabrous, usually metallic green-blue in middle, iridescent reddish-cupreous on sublateral areas and iridescent blue-green on lateral areas, slightly but mostly notably longer than wide, length 1.75–2.05 mm, width 1.75–1.95 mm; sulci well pronounced; anterior lobe slightly wider than posterior lobe; surface of anterior lobe rather coarsely, irregularly but mostly transversely rugulose; disc normally shaped with only moderately convex lateral margins of dorsally visible proepisterna, while thin, clearly dorsally visible notopleural sutures are much narrower and mutually subparallel; medial line distinct; whole discal surface up to the notopleural sutures covered with rather fine, wavy to vermicular rugae which are irregularly arranged and only slightly more transverse and coarser on median area; posterior lobe with distinct basal rim, shiny metallic reddishcupreous and mostly iridescent green on distinct dorsolateral bulges, its surface mostly coarsely and irregularly rugulose; all ventral and lateral sterna glabrous; proepisterna, mesepisterna and metepisterna shiny metallic black, rarely with diffusing golden or bluish lustre, female mesepisternal coupling sulci in form of a deep, sinuous longitudinal furrow running in the middle throughout the mesepisternum, more distinctly carved than the similar but shallower furrow in male, lacking any pit; prosternum, mesosternum and metasternum smooth and polished, metallic black with strong, chatoyant, blue or blue-green lustre. Elytra ( Figs 149–156) elongate, length 5.70–6.70 mm, in male with rounded humeri which are subquadrate in female; lateral margins as in  O. mexicanaand other species of this species-complex; dorsal elytral surface and pattern of commonly anastomosing punctures as in  O. iodopleura, but the punctation and also cristulate sculpture on elytral disc is somewhat denser; elytral coloration almost uniformly dark or bright reddish cupreous on elytral disc and also sublateral areas, with narrow or more distinct, blue-green lateral stripe passing to violaceous or purple-violet juxtaepipleural area; whitish elytral maculation in both sexes as in  O. iodopleura. Abdomen as in other species of this species complex, but ventrites predominantly metallic-blue. Legs as in  O. mexicana, but metatrochanters in some females blackened; femora rather variably coloured independent of sex, sometimes darker, particularly metafemora almost black (faded in old specimens). Aedeagus ( Figs 161–176) slightly more voluminous in middle than in preceding species, 3.25–3.40 mmlong, 0.95–1.00 mm wide, apex conspicuously capitate; internal sac ( Figs 162, 168) as in the preceding species.  Variability. Apart from some faint differences in the brightness of the elytral coloration,  O. ignitais not significantly variable in its external characters, but in some adults (independent of locality) the pronotal disc is wider than usual and such females my cause confusion with  O. iodopleura(see “Differential diagnosis” above). Humeral macula of female elytra is either reduced and invisible from above, or entirely missing. The aedeagi are somewhat variable in the shape of the capitate apex ( Figs 161–176), but among the great number of examined specimens, only one aedeagus of  O. ignita( Fig. 172) and one of  O. exilis( Fig. 203) with the apex of an intermediate shape between these two species have been found.   Biology and distribution(map Fig. 208). The occurrence of  O. ignitahas been verified only from Mexico (the state of Chiapas) and neighbouring Guatemala, and the occurrence in El Salvador, mentioned by Boyd (1982), has also been confirmed (two specimens in WJCM). Rivalier (1969)quite mistakenly mentioned “Venezuela and Panama” as the only occurrence for  O. ignita, partly because he obviously confused this species with  O. exilis,which was entirely unknown to him as he omitted the name in his review (see under that taxon below). Moreover, one historical specimen in MNHN from the Chaudoir collection bears handwritten labels “Venezuela” and “1543 / Rivalier”; the latter refers to the aedeagus separately mounted by Rivalier between two, underlying and cover glasses (stored in MNHN as “lames”). Examinations of the male and the “lame” with its aedeagus by the first author has confirmed that the male is conspecific with  O. ignita, but the specimen was obviously mislabelled as the occurrence in Venezuela is quite improbable (see “Map of the occurrence Fig. 208).  Erwin & Pearson (2008)in error have not mentioned the occurrence of  O. ignitain Mexico, although the country is the type locality of this species. The records from other countries outside of Mexico and Guatemala by some other authors, such as from Venezuela by Fleutiaux (1892)and Horn (1910, 1926), Panama by Boyd (1982), Costa Rica, Panama and Venezuela by Cassola & Pearson (2001), partly adopted by Erwin & Pearson (2008), are based either on the mentioned mislabelled historical specimens or on the confusion with  O. exiliswhich occurs in Panama but was not confirmed within this revision from Colombia nor Venezuela. These localities are with question marks in Erwin & Pearson (2008). Probably influenced by Rivalier (1969), Werner (1993)also erroneously included  Panamaand Venezuelaas the occurrence of  O. ignita, and published ( Werner 1993: 24, plate 12, fig. 89) a colour photograph of a supposed specimen of  O. ignitafrom Quepos (misspelled by him as “Quopos”) in the Costa Rican province of Puntarenas; thus he obviously confused this species with  O. exiliswhich occurs in the nearby Manuel Antonio National Park.   FIGURES 132–140.  Odontocheila ignitaChaudoir.132–133—habitus: 132—♂, 9.7mm, Mexique, HT (MNHN); 133—♂, 9.8 mm, Mexico, Union Suarez (CCJM ex DBCN); 134—head, ♂, ibid. (CCJM ex DBCN); 135–139—labrum: 135—♂, HT (MNHN); 136—♂, Guatemala, Quezaltenango (CCJM ex DBCN); 137—♂, Mexico, Mapastepek (CCJM ex DBCN); 138—♀, Union Suarez (CCJM ex DBCN); 139—♀, Guatemala, Quezaltenango (CCJM ex DBCN); 140—original labels, HT (MNHN). Bars = 1mm.   FIGURES 141–148.  Odontocheila ignitaChaudoir, type specimens of syn.  O. cinctulaBates, Guatemala, Zapote. 141–142— habitus: 141—♂, LT (BMNH); 142—♀, PLT (MNHN); 143—head, ♂, PLT (SDEI); 144—head part with buccal appendages, ♀, PLT (MNHN); 145–147—labrum: 145—♂, PLT (SDEI); 146—♂, LT (BMNH); 147—♀, PLT (MNHN); 148— original labels, LT (BMNH). Bars = 1mm.   FIGURES 149–157.  Odontocheila ignitaChaudoir.149–156—elytron: 149—♂, Mexique, HT (MNHN); 150—♂, Guatemala, Zapote, LT of syn.  O. cinctulaBates(BMNH); 151—♂, ibid., PLT of syn.  O. cinctula(SDEI); 152—♂, Mexico, Mapastepek (DBCN); 153—♂, Mexico, Union Juarez (CCJM); 154—♀, ibid. (DBCN); 155—♀, Guatemala, Quezaltenango (CCJM); 156—♀, Guatemala, Zapote, PLT of syn.  O. cinctula(MNHN); 157—pronotum, ♂, Mexique, HT (MNHN); Bars = 1mm.   FIGURES 158–176.  Odontocheila ignitaChaudoir.158–160—pronotum: 158—♂, Guatemala, Zapote, LT of syn.  O. cinctulaBates(BMNH); 159—♂, Mexico, Union Juarez (CCJM); 160—♀, Mexico, Mapastepek (CCJM); 161–176—aedeagus or its apex: 161—Mapastepek (CCJM); 162—ditto, internal sac; 163—ibid. (DBCN); 164—Zapote, LT of syn.  O. cinctula(BMNH); 165–168—ibid., PLT of syn.  O. cinctula: 165—(BMNH); 166—(SDEI); 167—(MNHN); 168—internal sac (SDEI); 169– 174—Union Juarez (DBCN and CCJM); 175–176—Guatemala, Quezaltenango (DBCN). Bars = 1mm. The record of  O. ignitafrom Peruby ( Pearson 1984) was based on misidentification as later rectified by Pearson et al. (1999)that the Peruvian record belonged to “  Pentacomia pentacomioides( W. Horn, 1900)”, which was restored by Moravec (2014) to its original name combination  Odontocheila pentacomioides W. Horn, 1900.   The Mexican regionof Soconusco is a narrow strip wedged between the Siera Madre de Chiapas mountains(Cordillera Central) and the Pacific Ocean, along the border with Guatemalain the southwest corner of the Mexican state of Chiapas. Mapastepek is in the same area and Union Juarez is situated eastwards, just near the border with Guatemala.  Quezaltenangolies in south-western Guatemala, while El Zapote(the typelocality of the synonymous  O. cinctula) is situated in north-eastern Guatemalanear the border with Belize. Like most of  Odontocheilaspecies, adults of  O. ignitainhabits trails through forests, but prefer the open areas for hunting. They frequently fly ahead and land on trails, sometimes landing on low vegetation, and often fly off the trail into the forest, but usually return to more open areas. The adults recently caught by the second author in Quezaltenango,  Guatemala, inhabited trails through coffee plantations.   Remarks. Examinations of the typespecimens has confirmed the synonymy of  O. cinctula Bates, 1881with  O. ignitaby Horn (1904), also treated it as such by Horn (1905, 1910, 1926) and subsequent authors such as Boyd (1982), Wiesner (1992)and Erwin & Pearson (2008), tentatively also by Huber et al.(2006). Lorenz (1989a, b, 2005a, b), Johnson (1996)and Cassola & Pearson (2001)mentioned or listed  O. cinctulaas a separate species.  Fleutiaux (1892)treated  O. cinctulaas a synonym of  Odontocheila secedens Steinheil, 1875that was described, however, from an area of the town of Muzo in the historical Nueva Grenada, 104 kmnorth of Bogota, Colombia. The synonymy by Fleutiaux (1892)was probably based on specimens labelled “  O. secedens”, but those in BMNH with “  secedens” on their labels, have their locality label: “Zapote, Guatemala” which is the type locality of the synonymous  O. cinctula, and indeed, these specimens proved to be identical with  O. ignita. In contrast,  O. secedensSteinheilwas correctly synonymized with  O. salviniby Horn (1892), and also was treated as the synonym of  O. salviniby Horn (1904), Boyd (1982)and Erwin & Pearson (2008). The synonymy is in accordance with some other specimens in collections labelled as  O. secedens, including the historical ones standing in MNHN (Fleutiaux historical Collection) under this name, and which proved to be conspecific with  O. salvini. The nomenclature is even more complicated by  O. secedenssensu Lynch Arribálzaga (1878), which is conspecific with  Odontocheila chrysis(Fabricius, 1801). Lynch Arribálzaga only misidentified and redescribed the species described by Steinheil (1875), but did not describe a new homonymous species as probably considered by Horn (1905)when he “synonymized”  O. secedenssensu Lynch Arribálzaga (1878)with  O. chrysis. In addition,  Odontocheila iodopleuroides Mandl, 1972was excluded from the genus  Odontocheila(Moravec 2013)because examination of the holotype(by monotypy) in NHMW by the first author, revealed that this species is conspecific with East Asian  Prothyma heteromalaMacLeay, 1825. 1434647457 BMNH G. C. Champion & Coll., I & Erwin & The & Jiri Moravec Guatemala Type Bates Zapote 31 482 2 2 lectotype 1434647454 MNHN Zapote & G. C. Champion & H. W. Bates & Biol Guatemala Guatemala 31 482 3 3 lectotype 1434647441 Coll. R. Guatemala Cent 31 482 1 1 Cent lectotype 1434647458 1996-10-23 MFNB, DEI Zapote & G. C. Champion & Mus. Berolin & Type & Coll. W. & Bat. & Bates Type & D. L. Pearson Guatemala Eberswalde 31 482 3 3 syntype 1434647444 SDEI, DEI Zapote & G. C. Champion & Musee de Belgique & Coll. W. & Eberswalde Guatemala Guatemala 31 482 1 1 syntype 1434647451 IRSNB G. C. Champion & W. Horn Coll. Cat. Guatemala H. W. Bates Junk Zapote 31 482 1 1 syntype 1434647448 BMNH Zapote & G. C. Champion & Bates & Coll., I Guatemala Guatemala 31 482 1 1 syntype 1434647445 BMNH Guatemala R. R. Murray Chaudoir 31 482 1 1 syntype 1434647438 BMNH G. C. Champion & Coll., I & Revision Jiri Moravec Guatemala All Zapote 31 482 1 1 paralectotype 1434647450 [199,1384,1655,1680] SDEI H. W. Bates Guatemala Museo 31 482 1 1 1434647434 BMNH G. C. Champion Guatemala Zapote 31 482 1 1 1434647455 BMNH B. C. A. Coll. Guatemala 488 San Isidro Champion 31 482 1 1 1434647436 MNHN Venezuela Other Museum Paris Rivalier 31 482 1 1 1434647439 MNHN Guatemala Guatemala 31 482 1 1 1434647456 [402,1243,1836,1861] 8. VII. MFNB Purpus S. V. Mexico Soconusco Recent 31 482 1 1 1434647453 [242,1111,1871,1896] CCJM Mexico 210 15.545 Mexico-Chiapas 31 482 1 1 1434647447 CCJM Mexico Km 15735 15.04 Mexico-Chiapas Union Juarez Rd 31 482 2 2 1434647449 1999-06-09 DBCN D. Brzoska & S. Motozintla Mexico Huixtla Motozintla Km 31 482 2 1 1 Chiapas 1434647435 [151,393,151,176] 2009-05-30 Brzoska 32 483 1 1434647452 2004-05-24 DBCN, CCJM D. Brzoska Guatemala 900 14.703333 Quezaltenango 128 -91.778336 32 483 11 6 5 1434647440 2009-05-31 RLHC Cacahoatan & R. L. Huber Mexico 735 Union Juarez 32 483 3 1 2 Chiapas 1434647446 2004-05-24 RLHC R. L. Huber & Hwy & Finca Horizonte Guatemala 900 14.703 Quezaltenango 13 -91.779 Colomba 32 483 2 2 1434647437 1994-06-23 WJCM N. Johnson & Bosque El Imposible & Depto Mexico Belisario Dominguez 32 483 5 2 3 Chiapas 1434647443 [367,1028,367,392] 1979-06-19 RD Cave El Salvador Ahuachapan 32 483 1 Ahuachapan 1434647442 Guatemala Siera Madre de Chiapas mountains The Mexican region 38 489 1 1434647478 Quezaltenango & El Zapote Guatemala Guatemala 38 489 1 holotype