Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35929/RSZ.0022 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FE1887BE-3923-FFC8-ED30-FEEF11FFFCEB |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758 ) |
status |
|
Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL
Cloe pumila . – F.-J. Pictet, 1843 -1845: 253, pl. 40, fig. 2. (nec Cloe pumila Burmeister, 1839 ; misidentification).
Baetis pumilus . – Eaton, 1870: 5 (transfer).
Baetis muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758) . – Bengtsson, 1912: 7 (synonymization).
Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL . – Waltz et al., 1994: 34 (transfer).
Material: NMW; 3 ♂ imagines; “Pictet vidit”, one male labelled “Baden [about 22 km southeast of Vienna], Kollar” .
Remarks: F.-J. Pictet mentioned “M. Kollar m’en a communiqué quelques exemplaires des environs de Vienne ”. A female specimen of B. muticus bears the label: vitreipennis Kllr Pictet Aust[ria] [Kollar’s handwriting?] / Baetis pumilus Burm. [Ulmer’s handwriting]. Kollar’s manuscript name “ Cloe vitreipennis” obviously has never been published and is therefore a nomen nudum.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
Sartori, Michel & Bauernfeind, Ernst 2020 |
Cloe pumila
Bengtsson S. 1912: 7 |
Eaton A. E. 1870: 5 |
Pictet F. -J. 1843: 253 |
Alainites muticus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
Waltz et al., 1994: 34 |