Gymnolaelaps kabitae Bhattacharyya, 1968
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DC6D28F-4A18-4C6E-85E3-6CA734EBB4FC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4432758 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FE0387F2-FF9F-FFEA-6ACA-FC2777F4F926 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gymnolaelaps kabitae Bhattacharyya, 1968 |
status |
|
Gymnolaelaps kabitae Bhattacharyya, 1968
( Figs 30–37 View FIGURES 30–37 )
Gymnolaelaps kabitae Bhattacharyya, 1968: 537 .
Pseudoparasitus (Gymnolaelaps) kabitae .— Karg, 1989b: 334.
Laelaspisella kabitae .— Joharchi & Halliday, 2013: 47; Joharchi et al., 2016: 21; Nemati et al., 2019: 82.
Gymnolaelaps kabitae .— Nemati & Gwiazdowicz, 2016: 45 View Cited Treatment .
Specimens examined. Two females, Alborz, Karaj , 36°03’ N, 51°24’ E, alt. 1665 m, 7 June 2011, O. Joharchi coll., in nest of Pheidole pallidula View in CoL GoogleMaps .
Bhattacharyya (1968) described Gymnolaelaps kabitae as a new species from specimens collected in soil under rotting plant material in West Bengal. Joharchi & Halliday (2013) placed this species in Laelaspisella and presented a supplementary description for the species. They wrongly stated that the palp tarsal claw has three pointed tines, while it actually has two ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30–37 ). Nemati & Gwiazdowicz (2016) treated this species as member of Gymnolaelaps . Nemati et al. (2019) revised the concept of Laelaspisella , but could not decide on the correct generic placement for G. kabitae . This species agrees with Laelaspisella in the following character states: (1) dorsal shield hypertrichous and with at least 11–13 non-secretory slit-like lyrifissures ( Figs 30 & 32 View FIGURES 30–37 ), (2) metasternal setae st4 absent ( Figs 31 & 33 View FIGURES 30–37 ); (3) genitiventral shield large and broad rounded posteriorly ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–37 ); (4) iv3 located on posterolateral angles of sternal shield ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–37 ); (5) internal malae densely fringed and with elongate threads ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30–37 ); (6) palp tarsal claw with two tines ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30–37 ). However, it differs from the original concept of Laelaspisella as described by Marais & Loots (1969), because the dorsal cheliceral seta is present ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 30–37 ) and the anterior margin of the epistome is irregularly denticulate ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 30–37 ). Nemati & Gwiazdowicz (2016) provided more character states that excludes G. kabitae from Laelaspisella .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gymnolaelaps kabitae Bhattacharyya, 1968
Joharchi, Omid, Ramroodi, Sara & Halliday, Bruce 2020 |
Laelaspisella kabitae
Nemati, A. & Khalili-Moghadam, A. & Gwiazdowicz, D. J. 2019: 82 |
Joharchi, O. & Babaeian, E. & Jalalizand, A. 2016: 21 |
Joharchi, O. & Halliday, B. 2013: 47 |
Pseudoparasitus (Gymnolaelaps) kabitae
Karg, W. 1989: 334 |
Gymnolaelaps kabitae
Bhattacharyya, S. K. 1968: 537 |