Pheidole glabra, Salata & Fisher, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.905.39592 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F4C766E4-633A-4103-9FFD-E952718F41FB |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C54726DF-9759-447D-AC25-87D471335D43 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C54726DF-9759-447D-AC25-87D471335D43 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Pheidole glabra |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Pheidole glabra sp. nov. Figs 68A-F View Figure 68 , 84T View Figure 84 , 86T View Figure 86
Type material.
Holotype. Madagascar. •1 major worker; Toliara; Grand Lavasoa, 25.9 km W Tolagnaro; -25.08767, 46.749; alt. 450 m; 30 Nov 2006; B.L. Fisher et al. leg.; BLF15399, CASENT0122911 (CASC). Paratype. Madagascar. •1 w.; same data as for holotype; CASENT0235037 (CASC).
Other material.
Madagascar. - Toliara: •1w., 1s.; Manatantely, 8.9 km NW Tolagnaro; -24.9815, 46.92567; alt. 100 m; 27 Nov 2006; B.L. Fisher et al. leg.; CASENT0125808, CASENT0125809 (CASC).
Diagnosis.
Major workers. Head in full-face view square, anterior and posterior of eyes relatively straight; sides of the head with dense, short, erect pilosity; malar area with sparse to moderately dense longitudinal rugae, interspaces smooth to finely rugulose; inner hypostomal teeth distinct, big, thick, triangular, with rounded apex; outer hypostomal teeth slightly but distinctly smaller and thin, with rounded tips, and wide base; propodeal spines moderately long, with base slightly wider than top; first gastral tergite shiny and finely shagreened; body brownish black to black. Minor workers. Whole head with sparse foveolae, frons and malar area with few additional, indistinct, longitudinal rugae, genae and centre of frons with sculpture reduced to absent; promesonotum low, slightly convex, with relatively steep posterior declivity; mesosoma foveolate, reduced on dorsal surface of pronotum, with katepisternum, anepisternum, promesonotal declivity, and lateral surfaces of propodeum smooth; propodeal spines very short, triangular; body dark brown.
Description.
Major workers. Measurements (N = 1): HL: 1.38; HW: 1.33; SL: 0.58; EL: 0.15; WL: 0.9; PSL: 0.2; MTL: 0.56; PNW: 0.63; PTW: 0.17; PPW: 0.61; CI: 96.3; SI: 43.8; PSLI: 14.1; PPI: 27.9; PNI: 47.1; MTI: 42.2. Head. In full-face view square, anterior and posterior of eyes relatively straight (Fig. 68B View Figure 68 ). In lateral view sub-rectangular; ventral and dorsal faces relatively flat; dorsal face indistinctly depressed posteriorly, forming indistinct transverse depression between frons and occipital lobes; inner hypostomal teeth visible. Sides of the head with dense, short, erect pilosity; whole head with dense, short, suberect to erect pilosity. Antennal scrobes indistinct and not delimited by carinulae; scrobe surface shiny, with dense to sparse, fine, longitudinal to irregular rugae, interspaces smooth to rugulae. Occipital lobes with thick, sparse, irregular rugae, interspaces smooth; frons with thick, sparse to moderately sparse, longitudinal rugae, interspaces smooth; malar area with sparse to moderately dense longitudinal rugae, interspaces smooth to finely rugulose; genae with fine, thin to indistinct rugulae. Clypeus shiny and smooth, with thin, longitudinal rugulae on the lateral sides; median notch present, wide and shallow; median longitudinal carina absent; lateral longitudinal carinae absent. Scape, when laid back, slightly surpassing the mid-length of head; pilosity decumbent to erect (Fig. 68B, D View Figure 68 ). Inner hypostomal teeth distinct, big, thick, triangular, with rounded apex; outer hypostomal teeth slightly but distinctly smaller and thin, with rounded tips, and wide base (Fig. 84T View Figure 84 ). Mesosoma. In lateral view, promesonotum short, angular, and relatively low, posterior mesonotum slightly steep, with indistinct tubercle-like projections; promesonotal groove absent; metanotal groove absent or indistinct; propodeal spines moderately long, with base slightly wider than top, apex rounded; humeral area with small and flat tubercles (Fig. 68D View Figure 68 ). Surface shiny, with fine and sparse rugoreticulation, pronotum with sculpture reduced, sometimes with smooth notches on lateral sides and centre of its dorsal surface; katepisternum and lateral sides of propodeum at least partially smooth. Pilosity moderately dense, long, and erect (Fig. 68D, F View Figure 68 ). Petiole. Shiny, with dense and fine rugulae; peduncle short, with small, rounded, horizontal lobes on its basal part; node moderately high and narrow, with convex apex, in rear view node slightly dorsoventrally concave; pilosity moderately and erect, long to moderately long (Fig. 68D, F View Figure 68 ). Postpetiole. Shiny, with fine and dense rugulae; short and rounded; in dorsal view sides with relatively long, acute, narrow and triangular projections; pilosity long, moderately dense, and erect (Fig. 68D, F View Figure 68 ). Petiole. First gastral tergite shiny and finely shagreened; pilosity moderately dense, moderately long, and erect (Fig. 68D, F View Figure 68 ). Colour. Unicolourous, brownish black to black; legs yellow to brown (Fig. 68D, F View Figure 68 ).
Minor workers. Measurements (N = 1): HL: 0.53; HW: 0.47; SL: 0.52; EL: 0.1; WL: 0.59; PSL: 0.1; MTL: 0.4; PNW: 0.32; PTW: 0.07; PPW: 0.11; CI: 88.4; SI: 111.4; PSLI: 18.0; PPI: 64.3; PNI: 68.9; MTI: 84.1. Head. Occipital margin straight or indistinctly concave; occipital carina indistinct, weakly developed (Fig. 68A View Figure 68 ). Pilosity moderately dense, long, erect. Whole head with sparse foveolae, frons and malar area with few additional, indistinct, longitudinal rugae, genae and centre of frons with sculpture reduced to absent. Clypeus shiny, rugoreticulate; median longitudinal carina absent; two lateral longitudinal carinae absent. Scape, when laid back, surpassing the posterior head margin by one-fifth of its length; pilosity erect (Fig. 68A, C View Figure 68 ). Mesosoma. In lateral view, promesonotum low, slightly convex, with relatively steep posterior declivity; promesonotal groove absent; metanotal groove indistinct; propodeal spines very short, triangular, apex acute (Fig. 68C View Figure 68 ). Sculpture foveolate, reduced on dorsal surface of pronotum, with katepisternum, anepisternum, promesonotal declivity, and lateral surfaces of propodeum smooth. Pilosity sparse, long, and erect (Fig. 68C, E View Figure 68 ). Petiole. Peduncle short and thin with ventral face slightly convex; node low, globular, and small; with few long, erect setae (Fig. 68C, E View Figure 68 ). Postpetiole. Moderately long, low, and convex; with few short, erect setae (Fig. 68C, E View Figure 68 ). Petiole. With moderately sparse, erect pilosity (Fig. 68C, E View Figure 68 ). Colour. Unicolourous, dark brown (Fig. 68C, E View Figure 68 ).
Etymology.
Latin for smooth, in reference to reduced sculpture of minor workers.
Biology.
The species was collected at 450 m in elevation, in rainforest. Nest was located in rotten log.
Comments.
This species is most similar to P. petax and P. brevipilosa sp. nov. Major workers. Pheidole glabra sp. nov. can be distinguished from P. petax by presence of erect pilosity on sides of head and lateral sides of head, and square head shape in full-face view; from P. brevipilosa sp. nov. by absence of foveolate sculpture on head, well-developed outer hypostomal teeth, pronotum with reduced sculpture and presence of smooth notches on its lateral and dorsal surfaces, and propodeum with presence of smooth notches on lateral sides. Minor workers. Pheidole glabra sp. nov. can be distinguished from P. petax by dark brown body colouration, presence of additional indistinct, longitudinal rugae on frons and malar area, clypeus never foveolate, and reduced sculpture on frons, dorsal surface of pronotum, promesonotal declivity, and lateral surfaces of propodeum; from P. brevipilosa sp. nov. by denser and longer pilosity on head, and frons, dorsal surface of pronotum, promesonotal declivity, and lateral surfaces of propodeum with sculpture reduced or absent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.