Opisthophthalmus fuscipes
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.3.37464 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87602625-AF8D-4A3F-BAE5-F35C09FB6C00 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FCE76F7D-8BD6-5266-856B-5E29CBA13EC9 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Opisthophthalmus fuscipes |
status |
|
Opisthophthalmus fuscipes Fig. 49 View Figure 49
Opisthophthalmus fuscipes Purcell, 1898: 20-23
Current combination.
Opistophthalmus fuscipes Purcell, 1898
Paralectotypes.
1 ♂ ( Fig. 49 A–B View Figure 49 ), 1 ♀ ( Fig. 49 C–D View Figure 49 ) (ZMH-A0001865), [South Africa], Kapland [Western Cape], Tulbagh Division, near the railway station [33°19 ’13” S, 19°05 ’59” E] Tulbagh Road at the foot of the Waterfall Mountains, F. Purcell leg.
Remarks.
Purcell (1899: 149-150) considered O. fuscipes as a subspecies of Opistophthalmus capensis (Herbst, 1800). Prendini (2001) subsequently highlighted consistent diagnostic differences between the two taxa and thus reinstated O. fuscipes as a species. Prendini (2001) also designated lectotype and paralectotype from the syntype series housed in the SAMC collection but did not cite the present specimens. Purcell (1898) mentioned that numerous specimens were part of the type series without giving a precise number. Given that the data of the present specimens match that of the original description, they are considered as paralectotypes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |