Paracinipe alticola ( Werner, 1932 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:259A2EA9-21DF-4482-8615-B1DB7E18597F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6333090 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB489415-E036-FFEC-FF4A-C00AFA9C3E48 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paracinipe alticola ( Werner, 1932 ) |
status |
|
Paracinipe alticola ( Werner, 1932) View in CoL ( Figs. 1F, G View FIG )
Type locality: Morocco, Tadlest .
Material examined. Achahoud towards road Marrakesh-Ouarzazad, 31.26094°N, 7.38826°W (2150 m), 27.V.2013 (1♂); GoogleMaps N of Achahoud, 31.28659°N, 7.18926°W (2000 m), 27.V.2013 (1♀) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. This species is known from central Morocco; the type-locality (Tadlest) is located north of Ouarzazad, Achahoud lies not far from Ouarzazad.
Remarks. According to Werner (1932), this montane species differs from P. crassicornis by the less yellow apically colored hind tibiae, and Chopard (1943) added that the male genitalia allow to identify it correctly.According to Descamps & Mounassif (1972), P. alticola has not the bilobate hind margin in the epiphallus; in addition, P. alticola differs from P. crassicornis by its lower pronotum and higher tegmina. P. alticola is very similar to P. luteomaculata , but differs from it by the male cerci shape (ca. 2 times longer than wide, while in P. luteomaculata they are 1.2 times longer than wide), the hind tibiae yellow or red (in P. luteomaculata they are yellow), always hairy, and the epiphallus, which generally is not bilobate on the hind margin (in P. luteomaculata it is always bilobate).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Caelifera |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Pamphaginae |
Tribe |
Pamphagini |
Genus |