Uduba valiha, Griswold & Ubick & Ledford & Polotow, 2022

Griswold, Charles, Ubick, Darrell, Ledford, Joel & Polotow, Daniele, 2022, A Revision of the Malagasy Crack-Leg Spiders of the Genus Uduba Simon, 1880 (Araneae, Udubidae), with Description of 35 New Species from Madagascar, Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 67, pp. 1-193 : 87-89

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13158554

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74E0D22E-9890-4FF0-80AB-8FCBBA976B2F

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB934153-0D08-4FA2-B1EC-105C2CF48036

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:DB934153-0D08-4FA2-B1EC-105C2CF48036

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Uduba valiha
status

sp. nov.

Uduba valiha View in CoL , new species

Figures 6 C View FIGURE , 8 F View FIGURE , 28 B View FIGURE , 64 A–C View FIGURE , 65 A–F View FIGURE , 72 G, H View FIGURE , 80 H, I View FIGURE , Maps 10, 17.

Type material. Holotype male ( CASENT9026394 ) and one paratype male ( CASENT9082181 ) collected in rainforest at 600m elevation in Forêt de Vevembe , Fianarantsoa Province, Madagascar, on 23 April 2006 by B.L. Fisher et al., deposited in CAS . Paratype female ( CASENT9006071 ) collected at 785m elevation from Massif Andringitra , Fianarantsoa Province, Madagascar on 24 September 1993 by B.L. Fisher, deposited in CAS .

Remarks. The form of the male palp is similar among Uduba valiha , U. fisheri and U. hiragasy : females of U. fisheri and U. hiragasy have been collected with and therefore associated with males but no females have been collected with U. valiha . The form of the female genitalia of both the species U. fisheri and U. hiragasy is similar to that of specimen CASENT9006071 from Massif Andringitra, suggesting this female belongs to the same group of species. Because this female is distinct from those of U. fisheri and U. hiragasy , and geographically near the male localities of U. valiha , we tentatively associate the males collected in rainforest at 600m elevation in Forêt de Vevembe with the female collected at 785m elevation from Massif Andringitra as U. valiha . There appears to be an error on the label for specimens collected by S. Goodman at Forêt de Vinetalo [FMHD-00-223, i.e., CASENT9064656, 3♂, FMNH): the label states “[212°[sic] 46.6ʹS, 47°20.8ʹE” but according to maps and Google Earth the locality should be 21°46.6ʹS, 47°20.8ʹE.

Etymology. The species epithet, valiha, refers to a tube zither considered the “national instrument” of Madagascar, a noun in apposition.

Diagnosis. Uduba valiha belong to Group III, the Uduba valiha group ( Map 17 View MAP ). They are cribellate with divided cribellum or vestige. Males differ from other species by having a retromedian ridge on the tegulum ( Figs. 64 C View FIGURE , 65 E View FIGURE ), and a deeply bifid MA ( Fig. 28 B View FIGURE ) with prolateral lobe slender, retrolateral lobe stout; U. valiha males differ from those of U. hiragasy by having a short, stout retrolateral spine on the palpal tibia ( Fig. 64 C View FIGURE ) (spine absent in U. hiragasy , Fig. 44 C View FIGURE ), by having the TA2 apically rolled ( Fig. 28 B View FIGURE ) (blunt, entire in U. hiragasy , Fig. 28 A View FIGURE ) and the apex of the MA prolateral lobe rounded slender ( Figs. 64 A View FIGURE , 65 E View FIGURE ) (truncate in U. hiragasy , Fig. 44 B View FIGURE ). Females lack a median lobe or defined atrium on the epigynum ( Figs. 72 G View FIGURE , 80 H View FIGURE ) and have the vulva with spermathecal loops few, anteroposteriorly oriented ( Figs. 72 H View FIGURE , 80 I View FIGURE ); U. valiha can be distinguished from those of similar Uduba species by having the lateral epigynal margins strongly convex ( Fig. 72 G View FIGURE , 80 H View FIGURE ) (but the lateral margins not developed into the lateral “ears” found in U. evanescens and U. pseudoevanescens , Figs. 71 A, E View FIGURE ); distinguished from female U. fisheri ( Fig. 72 E View FIGURE ). and U. hiragasy ( Fig. 72 C View FIGURE ) by lacking a strong ridge along epigastric furrow and having lateral lobes with convex edges forming ridges or lobes on each side, these ridges extending around anteriorly and posteriorly of CO ( Fig. 72 G View FIGURE ).

Description. Male (holotype): Total length 9.00. Markings as in Fig. 8 F View FIGURE . Carapace 4.60 long, 3.10 wide, 1.60 high; clypeus 0.25 high. Eye diameters:AME 0.18, ALE, PME and PLE 0.20. Chelicerae 1.80 long; sternum 2.10 long, 1.60 wide; labium 1.00 long; palpal coxae 1.50 long. Divid- ed cribellum. Spination (paratype CASENT9082181): palpus–femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, tibia r0-1-0, p0-1-0; leg I–femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1-0, r0-1-1-1, patella p1, tibia d0-1-1-1, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, r0- 1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-1; leg II–femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1-0, r0-1-1-1, patella p1, tibia d0-0-1-1, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-1; leg III–femur d1-1-1, p1-0-1-1, r1-0-1-1, patella p1, tibia d1-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1- 2, v2-2-1, r1-1-2; leg IV–femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1-1, r0-0-1-0, tibia d1-0-1-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-2-2, r0-1- 1-0, metatarsus p1-2-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-2. Scopulae: cymbium, apicodorsal ( Fig. 65 A View FIGURE ); tarsi I–IV, ventral. Leg measurements (holotype): I: 4.20 + 1.60 + 4.00 + 4.30 + 2.50 = 16.60; II: 3.90 + 1.50 + 3.40 + 3.60 + 2.20 = 14.60; III: 3.30 + 1.40 + 2.40 + 3.30 + 1.90 = 12.30; IV: 4.60 + 1.40 + 4.00 + 5.20 + 2.30 = 17.50; palpus: 1.80 + 0.70 + 0.80 + NA + 2.00 = 5.30. Leg formula 4123. Male palp (holotype): palpal tibia 0.41 cymbial length, RTA triangular, procurved, with pointed apex ( Figs. 64 C View FIGURE , 65 A, C View FIGURE ), RTA length 0.33 tibia, VTA triangular, short, length 0.30 tibia width ( Figs. 64 B, C View FIGURE ), UTA small; tibia with slender prolateral and a stout retrolateral spine ( Fig. 64 C View FIGURE ); tegulum ( Figs. 64 C View FIGURE , 65 D View FIGURE ) with longitudinal, retromedian ridge, ridge beginning near tegulum base and extending for 0.80 tegulum length; TA3 a pointed spine, mostly hidden behind TA2, TA2 small, rectangular, apex curled ( Fig. 28 B View FIGURE ); MA origin at 0.56 tegulum length, extends to tegulum apex, length (including apical processes) slightly greater than width, length 0.45 tegulum width, deeply bifid MA with prolateral lobe slender, with rounded apex, retrolateral lobe stout with apical hook ( Figs. 64 A–C View FIGURE ); tegulum with apical mound that partially covers prolateral lobe of MA ( Fig. 64 A View FIGURE ); conductor fan entire. Female (paratype): Total length 10.00. Markings as in Fig. 6 C View FIGURE . Carapace 4.79 long, 3.29 wide, 2.14 high; clypeus 0.21 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.18, ALE and PME 0.25, PLE 0.21. Chelicerae 2.43 long; sternum 2.18 long, 1.61 wide; labium 1.07 long; palpal coxae 1.61 long. Ratios –carapace length / width = 1.46, carapace height / width = 0.65, PER / carapace width = 0.67, PER/OAL = 2.67, PER/AER = 1.31, OAL/OQL = 1.00, OQP/ OQA = 1.24, clypeus height / AME = 1.20, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 11.33, sternum length / width = 1.36, palpal coxa length / width = 2.25, femur I length / carapace width =1.00, metatarsus I length / carapace width = 0.76, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.00, palpal tarsus length / carapace width = 0.37, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.42, palpal tarsus length / palpal tibia length = 1.42, palpal tarsus length / palpal femur length = 0.81, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.00. Divided cribellum. Spination: palpus–femur d0-0-1-1, r0-0-1, tibia p2-1, r1-0, tarsus p2-1; leg I– femur d0-1-1-0, p0-0-2, tibia v2-2-2-2, metatarsus v2-2-3; leg II–femur d0-1-1-0, p0-0-0-1, tibia v1-1-1-2, metatarsus v2-2-3; leg III–femur d0-1-0-0, p0-1-0-1, r0-1-0-1, tibia d1-1-0-0, p0-1-1-0, v2-1-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p1-1-2, v2-2-2, r1-1-2, tarsus v0-1-0; leg IV–femur d0-1-1-0, tibia v1- 2-2, r0-1-1-0, metatarsus p0-1-2, v0-2-2, r1-1-2, tarsus v0-1-0. Scopulae: ventral on metatarsus– tarsus I and II, ventral on apical metatarsus–tarsus III and IV. Leg measurements: I: 3.29 + 1.57 + 2.43 + 2.50 + 1.50 = 11.29; II: 2.79 + 1.43 + 2.07 + 1.86 + 1.36 = 9.50; III: 2.43 + 1.07 + 1.43 + 1.79 + 1.07 = 7.79; IV: 3.29 + 1.50 + 2.57 + 3.21 + 1.43 = 12.00; palpus: 1.50 + 0.86 + 0.86 + NA + 1.21 = 4.43. Leg formula 4123. Female genitalia: epigynal plate without depressed atrium ( Figs. 72 G View FIGURE , 80 H View FIGURE ), plate width 1.43 times length, lateral lobes with convex edges forming ridges on each side, these convex, these ridges extending around anteriorly and posteriorly of CO, width between bases of LL 0.88 times epigynum width, LL side width 0.14 times width epigynum; medi- an lobe a flat plate, copulatory openings at mid-level of plate at 0.41 of epigynum length, distance between copulatory openings 0.58 times epigynum width. Vulva ( Figs. 72 H View FIGURE , 80 I View FIGURE ) with spermathecal ducts forming 2–3 loose, longitudinal loops, vulva length 0.88 times width, fertilization ducts very close, vulva width 16.50 times distance between FD.

Variation. Male (N= 5): Total length 8.50–11.00; carapace length / width = 1.38–1.68, carapace height / width = 0.49–0.55, PER / carapace width = 0.34–0.38, PER/OAL = 2.19–2.60, PER/AER = 1.24–1.51, OAL/OQL = 1.13–1.37, OQP/ OQA = 1.19–1.39, clypeus height / AME = 1.11–1.67, cheliceral length / clypeus height = 7.00–10.50, sternum length / width = 1.29–1.41, palpal coxa length / width = 2.33–2.80, femur I length / carapace width = 1.16–1.35, metatarsus I length / carapace width = 1.11–1.39, femur IV length / carapace width = 1.18–1.48, cymbium length / carapace width = 0.60–0.70, cymbium length / palpal patella length = 2.86–3.83, cymbium length / palpal tibia length = 2.33–2.80, cymbium length / palpal femur length = 1.05–1.28, palpal tibia length / palpal patella length = 1.14–1.50. Compared to specimens from Vinetelo, specimens from Vevembe have the legs slightly relatively longer and the cymbium slightly shorter. Female variation unknown: only one female, a paratype, has been collected.

Material examined. MADAGASCAR: Fianarantsoa Province: Forêt de Vevembe , 66.6 km 293°WNW Farafangana, 22°47ʹ28ʺS, 047°10ʹ55ʺE, elev. 600m, yellow pan trap, rainforest in transition to montane forest, 23 April 2006, B.L. Fisher et al. [BLF14119] (Holotype, CASENT9026394 , 1♂, CAS), (paratype, CASENT9082181 , 1♂, CAS) GoogleMaps , Forêt de Vinetalo, at foot of Ambodivohita , 21°46.6ʹS, 47°20.8ʹE, elev. 100m, disturbed lowland rainforest in transition to montane forest, pitfall traps, S. Goodman [FMHD-00-223] ( CASENT9064656 , 3♂, FMNH) , Massif Andringitra , 45 km S Ambalavo, 22°13ʹS, 47°1ʹE, elev. 785m, rainforest, pitfall trap, 24 September 1993, B.L. Fisher (paratype CASENT9006071 , 1♀, CAS) .

Natural history. All specimens of Uduba valiha have been collected in rainforest at low to mid elevation, from 100m to 785m, and all were collected in pitfall or yellow pan traps, suggesting that males and females of this cribellate species both wander at some point in their lives. We know nothing of the use of cribellate silk in U. valiha .

Distribution. The species Uduba valiha is known only from three forested localities in southeastern Madagascar (Maps 10, 17).

CAS

California Academy of Sciences

FMNH

Field Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Udubidae

Genus

Uduba

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF