Exoprosopa tuckeri Bezzi, 1921
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1149.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:015DD261-8C5F-496E-A005-169ECDE3D10A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5059033 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F954D757-F359-FFA3-3666-F8A3FE12FC87 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Exoprosopa tuckeri Bezzi |
status |
|
Exoprosopa tuckeri Bezzi View in CoL
Exoprosopa tuckeri Bezzi, 1921a: 169 View in CoL .
Distribution. Namibia , Zimbabwe.
Material examined. 3♂♂, 3♀♀, Rundu District, Mile 46, 18°18’39”S 19°15’29”, 25–27.iii.2003, A.H. KirkSpriggs, Malaise trap ; 1♂, Otjiwene District, Epukiro River at 21°24’27”S 20°16’29”E, 9.ii.2001, A.H. KirkSpriggs GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Gobabis District, Somerkoms 521, 22°01’59”S 19°57’22”E, 6–8.ii.2001, KirkSpriggs, Marais & Wheeler, Malaise trap sample GoogleMaps .
Notes. The hitherto undescribed female is similar to the male, including width of vertex, except that the wing pattern is sexually dimorphic. Like E. sigmoidea the dimidiate infuscation of the male is extended obliquely in an almost parallel sided projection from the end of R 1 to the anterior end of the interradial crossvein thence to M 2 midway between cell dm and the wing margin on the outer side and on the inner side from the posterior end of mm forward across the apex of dm to meet the dimidiate infuscation in cell r 5. The prolongation of the infuscation is thus more rectangular than that of E. sigmoidea females and does not extend to cell m 1 but slightly more of the axillary cell is infuscated.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Exoprosopa tuckeri Bezzi
Greathead, David J. 2006 |
Exoprosopa tuckeri
Bezzi 1921: 169 |