Litus, Haliday, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5557.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CE8CC38-F965-4404-ACCD-6D0DBDB942FB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14597190 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F879DB6E-9977-FFA3-FF35-F8F8FD60FD5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Litus |
status |
|
LITUS Haliday, 1833 View in CoL
( Figs 176–180 View FIGURES 176–178 View FIGURES 179, 180 )
Litus Haliday 1833a: 269 View in CoL ; 1833b: 345. Type species: Litus cynipseus Haliday, 1833 View in CoL , by monotypy.
Congolia Ghesquière, 1942: 320 View in CoL . Type species: Congolia sycophila Ghesquière, 1942 View in CoL , by monotypy. Synonymy by Debauche, 1949: 17. This genus and its type species were accidentally omitted from the list of generic synonyms in Huber et al. (2021).
Diagnosis. Funicle 6-segmented ( Fig. 177 View FIGURES 176–178 ); mandibles crossing or barely meeting when closed, each with 2 subequal teeth ( Fig. 176a View FIGURES 176–178 ); ocelli forming an obtuse triangle with the lateral ocellus at posterolateral angle of vertex; head posteriorly without evident sulci, the occiput separated from gena/postgena by slight change in sculpture lateral to dorsal margin of foramen ( Fig. 176b View FIGURES 176–178 ); fore wing narrow, only slightly widening towards apex ( Fig. 178 View FIGURES 176–178 ); mesophragma projecting into gaster; propodeum posteriorly with a short but wide ring-like nucha (neck) separated from rest of propodeum by a distinct narrowing ( Fig. 180a View FIGURES 179, 180 ); petiole (not visible unless metasoma detached) short and narrow; metasoma smooth, laterally compressed, cynipoid-like, with gt 1 the largest tergum ( Fig. 180a View FIGURES 179, 180 ).
Remarks. Huber et al. (2020) had placed Litus in the Alaptus group but this is incorrect. Litus apparently belongs to the Camptoptera group of genera because of its narrow petiole (usually completely hidden so removal of the metasoma is needed to see it). The most similar genus is probably Ptilomymar . The strongly sculptured head and mesosoma contrasting with the smooth and shiny metasoma helps separate the species of Litus from other genera in the group.
Neotropical hosts. Unknown.
Important reference. Ogloblin (1935).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Litus
Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2024 |
Congolia Ghesquière, 1942: 320
Debauche, H. R. 1949: 17 |
Ghesquiere, J. 1942: 320 |
Litus
Haliday, A. H. 1833: 269 |
Haliday, A. H. 1833: 345 |