Thereus praxioides Faynel & Fåhraeus, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5728.2.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E6171E0-E7A7-430E-BCC0-2C583209A94F |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F8303331-AF32-EA03-ABEF-FB1D9F7EEA19 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Thereus praxioides Faynel & Fåhraeus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Thereus praxioides Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov.
LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 43D0108A-9D02-49C6-A168-A3CA8FF483E5
Figures 27, 28 View FIGURES 23–33 , 46 View FIGURES 34–49 , 62 View FIGURES 60–65 , 75 View FIGURES 66–77 , 79 View FIGURES 78–80 , 81 View FIGURES 81–85 , 86 View FIGURES 86–87
Type material. Holotype male ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–33 ), FW: 17.65 mm, labelled as “ GUYANE // RN2—PK 45 ( Cordia ) // 4°36’N — 52°22’ O // 16. I. 2021 // E. Poirier leg.” (white rectangular label, black printed); “CF-LYC-1898” (orange rectangular label, black printed); “ Holotype ♂ // Thereus praxioides // Faynel & Fåhraeus, 2025 ” (red rectangular label, black printed). Currently in RCCF, the holotype will be deposited in MNHN. GoogleMaps
Paratypes ( 17♂, 4♀). MEXICO . 1♂, Veracruz, San Andrés Tuxtla , 700 m, ix.2015, B. López leg., CF-LYC-827*, gen. prep. K. Florczyk CFCF215 ( RCCF) ; 5♂, same locality ( RCCF) . COSTA RICA. 1♂, OP431090 View Materials *, GBAAZ30154-24 ( GenBank data from Valencia-Montoya et al. 2021) . TRINIDAD. 1♂, Ex. Grose Smith , 1910, J.J. Joicey Coll. B.M. 1929-435, NHMUK015203811* ( NHMUK) ; 1♂, Rio Claro, Guayaguayare Road , x.1995, S. Alston-Smith leg. ( Collection Scott Alston-Smith, Trinidad and Tobago). FRENCH GUIANA . 1♂, Patawa , 3.xii.2000, J. Cerda leg., Coll. C. Faynel n° 1033 ( RCCF) ; 1♂, Roura, Cacao , iv.2006 ( RCCF) ; 1♂, Roura, Cacao , 4°33'35" N, 52°27'29" W, 2.ix.2015, Bonin leg., CF-LYC-667*, gen. prep. K. Florczyk CFCF044 ( RCCF) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Roura, Route de Kaw , xii.2006 ( RCCF) ; 1♂, Sinnamary, Crique Malmanoury , 5°17'13" N, 52°49'38" W, 31.xii.2022 - 10.i.2023, C. Faynel leg. ( RCCF) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Route de Kaw PK 7, 21.xi.2013, ex-coll. Christian Castelain, CF-LYC-1061*, gen. prep. K. Florczyk CFCF045 ( RCCF, illustrated on Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23–33 ) ; 1♂, Sinnamary, Malmanoury (barrière), 3.i.2023, L1495, NPML_lyc97 (coll. Nino Page & Maeva Leroy) ; 1♂, Sinnamary , barrage de Petit Saut, sur Cordia , 28.i.2024, L1953, NPML_lyc422 (coll. Nino Page & Maeva Leroy) ; 1♀, Régina, ZNIEFF Mapaou Athanaze, Camp Mathias ( Mapaou ), 31.vii.2024, L2297, NPML_lyc494 (coll. Nino Page & Maeva Leroy) ; 1♀, Sinnamary, Route de Petit Saut , 5°04'03.9'' N, 53°02'48.2"W, 12.i.2025, L2372 (coll. Nino Page & Maeva Leroy) GoogleMaps . PERU. Huánuco. 1♂, Tingo María , 26.ix.2015, 9°17'58"S, 76°00'58"W, 750m, CFCD01305*, gen. prep. K. Florczyk ( FILS) GoogleMaps . BRAZIL. Pará . 1♀, B.M. Type NoRH. 720, NHMUK015200801* ( NHMUK) .
Paratypes have the following labels “ Paratype ♂ [or ♀] // Thereus praxioides // Faynel & Fåhraeus, 2025 ” (blue rectangular label, black printed).
iNaturalist data. GUYANA. 1♀, Orealla, 6.i.2023 .
Diagnosis and description. Thereus praxioides sp. nov. and Thereus praxis are sister species in the ML tree ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Thereus praxioides sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. praxis by: (1) narrower DFW black margins on males ( Figs 46, 47 View FIGURES 34–49 ); (2) different shapes of male scent patch, respectively oval in the first and flattened oval in the latter; (3) 5.31 % mean genetic divergence ( Table 3). Male ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–33 ). FW length: 15.39 mm (n = 1). Wing. DFW dark blue covering a large part of the wing. VW brown with same pattern as usual in this group. Male genitalia ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 60–65 ). Four males dissected. Similar to Thereus praxis but with longer dorsal pair of brush organs, genital ring less wide in ventral view. Eighth tergite long with W-shaped anterior border and concave posterior one. Female ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23–33 ). FW length: 13.9 mm (n = 2). Wings. brown dorsally, beige-brown ventrally but lighter than male, same ventral patterns. Female genitalia ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 66–77 ). Two females dissected. Similar to T. praxis but with deeper ostium bursae. Small signa present in the corpus bursae on the female from Pará, not the other one from French Guiana but its bursa was wrinkled and it is possible, regarding their small size, that the signa were not detected. Papillae anales also with two sclerotized half capsules facing each other attached to ventro-lateral sides of them. Eighth tergite subrectangular.
Ethology. Adults have been observed feeding on Cordia schomburgkii A. DC. ( Boraginaceae ) in French Guiana primary forest (Cacao, Kaw mountain).
Sympatry. According to the known distribution ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 86–87 ), Thereus praxioides sp. nov. is sympatric with T. confusus sp. nov. in Brazil (Pará) and Peru ( Huánuco). T. praxioides sp. nov. and T. praxis are sympatric at least in Mexico and Costa Rica.
Known distribution ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 86–87 ). Mexico. Costa Rica. Trinidad. Guyana. French Guiana. Peru (HUC). Brazil (PA).
Etymology. This name comes from the combination of praxis and the suffix -oides, that means "looks like " praxis , to form a masculine Latinized name, with a wink at T. ortalus / T. ortaloides stat. rev.
Remarks. A witness of the confusion that previously occurred in this group, this new species was listed as T. praxis ( Faynel 2010) in French Guiana; listed as T. ortalus and cited as a new island record for Trinidad (Cock & Robbins 2016). These authors also mentioned two females near Thereus tiasa ( ♀, Sangre Grande, S. Alston-Smith leg., ix.1980 and ♀, Inniss Field, M.J.W. Cock leg., x.1994). Thereus tiasa , as defined in this paper, does not occur in Trinidad. We consider these two females as also belonging to Thereus praxioides sp. nov.
The Brazilian paratype of Thereus praxioides sp. nov. (NHMUK015200801) has a label indicating “Formerly designated as TYPE [of T. tiasa ]. Does not match original description, B. Huertas, R. O’Brien” (see under T. tiasa paragraph).
| NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
