Euochin bethunei, Wang & Zhang, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5E47BD6-8995-40CC-9C0F-CA7462A62DF2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8005026 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F70C8787-FF8A-E07C-FF5C-FF54FD9AFDDF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euochin bethunei |
status |
sp. nov. |
Euochin bethunei View in CoL sp. nov. (ƦĖḋƙẅss)
Figs 4–18 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–14 View FIGURES 15–18
Type material. Holotype: ♁ (MHBU-ARA-00022291), CHINA: Hunan Province, Yongzhou City, Dongan County, Damiaokou Town , Shunshan Park , Ehuangxi (kěUDZHƜȑȁđṖĀ), 26.416301°N, 111.0356687°E, 694 m a.s.l., 8 October 2015, leg. C. Jin, X. Guo & J. He. GoogleMaps Paratype: 1♀ (MHBU-ARA-00025229), same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is in honor of a prominent internationalist from Canada, Dr. Henry Norman Bethune, who saved numerous Chinese soldiers during World War II and is widely commemorated by the people of China.
Diagnosis. The males resemble Euochin bulbus ( Bao & Peng, 2002) in genitalic features, but can easily be distinguished by the non-furcated retromarginal tooth of the chelicera and the tubular form of the embolus ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 4–8 , 9–12 View FIGURES 9–14 , 15 View FIGURES 15–18 ; vs. the compound retromarginal tooth of four cusps and the ribbon-like embolus in E. bulbus , see Bao & Peng 2002: fig. 14; Zha et al. 2014: figs 16–17, 19–20). The male palp is also like that of Euochin yaoi Wang & Li, 2021 , but differs by the robust embolus and thin RTA (vs. thin embolus and strong RTA in E. yaoi , see Wang & Li 2021: figs 2B–D). The female epigyne is similar to that of E. bulbus , but can be recognized by the obviously smaller epigynal window and accessory gland ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 9–14 , 17 View FIGURES 15–18 ; see Zha et al. 2014: figs 14, 21).
Description. Male. Habitus see Figs 4, 6 View FIGURES 4–8 . Carapace length 1.518; abdomen length 1.390. Eye measurements: AME 0.289, ALE 0.229, PME 0.067, PLE 0.190. Leg measurements: I 2.413 (0.813, 0.381, 0.559, 0.326, 0.334), II 2.276 (0.756, 0.354, 0.483, 0.364, 0.319), III 2.425 (0.807, 0.311, 0.483, 0.481, 0.343), IV 2.847 (0.853, 0.361, 0.614, 0.640, 0.379); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: carapace dark. Abdomen dark, with light bands and patches. Chelicera ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–8 ) with two promarginal and one retromarginal teeth. Palp ( Figs 9–12 View FIGURES 9–14 , 15–16 View FIGURES 15–18 ): tibia and cymbium with long white setal tuft dorsally; embolic disc circular, embolus relatively short and thick, tube-like, with notably large opening of sperm duct at tip; cymbial flange narrow but obvious; RTA short, dorsally margined with laminate process.
Female. Habitus see Figs 5, 7 View FIGURES 4–8 . Carapace length 1.486; abdomen length 1.452. Eye measurements: AME 0.283, ALE 0.214, PME 0.062, PLE 0.194. Leg measurements: I 2.177 (0.747, 0.345, 0.490, 0.292, 0.303), II 2.004 (0.694, 0.346, 0.407, 0.295, 0.262), III 2.350 (0.831, 0.342, 0.443, 0.442, 0.292), IV 2.869 (0.871, 0.336, 0.637, 0.628, 0.397); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: similar to that of male, but lighter in coloration. Chelicera as in male. Epigyne ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURES 9–14 , 17–18 View FIGURES 15–18 ): diameter of epigynal window less than that of spermatheca; median septum hourglass-like; copulatory opening located antero-centrally on margin of epigynal window; copulatory duct with obvious accessory gland; spermatheca ovoid, bottom close to genital furrow.
Distribution. China (Hunan).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |