Ascelosodis emarginata, Ren, Guo-Dong & Shi, Ai-Min, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172696 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6261327 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F66D3B09-1414-4062-FED6-31E6FD31F890 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ascelosodis emarginata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ascelosodis emarginata , sp. nov.
( Figs 1–13 View FIGURES 1 – 13 , 146 View FIGURES 146 – 149. 146 )
Type material
Holotype: male, CHINA: Tibet, Burang, 30º18’ N, 81º06’ E, 3800 m, 12 Jul. 2004, collected by Yibin Ba and Aimin Shi ( MHBU). Paratypes: 23 males and 20 females, same data as the holotype ( MHBU); 4 males and 3 females, same data as the holotype but 18 Aug. 1974, collected by Jijun Li ( MHBU); 3 males and 2 females, same data as the holotype but 18 Aug. 1974, collected by Xiangchu Yin ( MHBU); 1 male, same data as the holotype but Gar, 32º06’N, 80º00’E, 4200 m, 15 Jul. 2004, collected by Aimin Shi and Yibin Ba ( MHBU).
Diagnosis
The new species is closely related to A. intermedia Bates, 1879 (as demonstrated by clypeal lobe separated from lateral lobes by shallow incisions, outer margins of epipleura not extending to shoulders of elytra), but can be distinguished by body shiny, anterior margin and base of pronotum bordered along entire length, pronotal surface with dense coarse punctures, elytra widest before the middle and humeral angles rounded.
Description
Male ( Figs 1–8 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ). Ovate, black to reddishbrown, shiny; antennae, legs and palpi pitchybrown to reddishbrown.
Clypeal lobe ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) moderately prominent, nearly semiglobate, separated from lateral lobes by shallow obtuseangled incisions. Genae weakly convex, outer margins arcuately converging to clypeus. Dorsal surface of head weakly convex, with dense punctures, denser on clypeal lobe and genae than on disc, punctures elongate at inner parts of eyes and obscure at anterior margin of clypeus. Antennae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) long, extending to or nearly to pronotal base. Length (width) ratio of antennomeres 2 to 11 as follows: 8.8(5.5): 12.2(5.0): 6.8(5.1): 6.1(5.1): 6.1(5.1): 5.8(5.1): 6.1(5.5): 6.7(6.9): 6.7(8.1): 7.1(6.2). Apical parts of inner margins of antennomeres 8 and 9, apical part of inner and outer margins of antennomere 10 and apical part of antennomere 11 with dense hair and sparse long setae.
Pronotum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) transverse, 1.85–2.11 (1.97, on the average, n=10) times as wide as long, widest in the middle, 1.53–1.64 (1.58, on the average, n=10) times as wide as head. Lateral margins of pronotum arcuately protruding, bordered along entire length; anterior margin sinuate, base almost parallel with it, both bordered along entire length. Anterior angles of pronotum nearly rectangular; posterior ones obtuse. Pronotal surface convex, with clear punctures sparser on disc than on sides; lateral margins narrowly and steeply sloping. Propleura concave, with incomplete punctures and sparse granules. Intercoxal process of prosternum linguiform, slightly prominent behind coxae and steeply sloping at apex.
Elytra ovate, 1.25–1.37 (1.31, on the average, n=10) times as long as wide, widest immediately before the middle, 1.16–1.31 (1.25, on the average, n=10) times as wide as pronotum. Elytral base not bordered, humeral angles rounded. Elytral surface with dense punctures on disc; sides with granules and several long hairs. Epipleura narrow, completely ventral, outer margins not extending to shoulders, with very sparse granules. Visible abdominal ventrites punctate, each puncture with a light seta.
Legs strong. Outer margins of protibiae clearly serrate, outer apical angles elongate, extending beyond anterior margin of protarsomere 4. Length ratio of metatarsomeres 1–4 as follows: 21: 8: 7: 15.
Aedeagus ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ): length 1.57 mm (when body length 7.2 mm). Parameres 0.91 mm long, 0.29 mm wide, with setae at apices. Spiculum gastrale as in Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 13 . Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII deeply sinuate ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ).
Female ( Figs 9–13 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ): Difficult to distinguish from male by general characters. Ovipositor as in Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 1 – 13 . Posterior margin of urotergite VIII ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) arcuately prominent. Urosternite VIII ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) and spiculum ventrale ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) with posterior margins very weakly sinuate.
Distribution
China: Tibet (Burang and Gar).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |