Carinobolus complex, 2022

Golovatch, Sergei & Vandenspiegel, Didier, 2022, Carinobolus gen. nov. and Costabolus gen. nov., two new, remarkably crested monospecific genera of spirobolidan millipedes from WestAfrica, with the proposal of a new tribe, Amblybolini tribus nova (Diplopoda, Spirobolida, Pachybolidae), Zootaxa 5150 (1), pp. 97-110 : 99-102

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.1.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F6FD286-5E1E-40F7-B658-490EFD453BDF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6611451

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F33487D0-FFD9-FFF3-FF78-FF56FAFB1F0A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Carinobolus complex
status

gen. nov.

Carinobolus complex sp. nov.

Figs 1–3 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3

Material examined. Holotype male ( NHMD), southeastern NIGERIA, 56 km from Calabar , 13.VI.1963, collector unknown.

Paratypes: 1 male, 1 female ( NHMD) , 1 male ( SEM, RMCA), same data as holotype .

Name. Complex, a noun in apposition referring to the particularly complex anterior gonopods.

Diagnosis. Basically as in the genus. Body short, up to 26 mm long, with 38 body rings plus telson. Metazonae bimodally crested, epiproct slightly projecting caudally. Tarsal pads present, coxal projections absent. Legs and antennae short. Anterior gonopods particularly complex, multiramous, rather palm-shaped, with a paramedian pair of antero-apical processes and a two-segmented telopodite.

Description. Measurements: male holotype with 39 body rings (38 + telson), ca 26 mm long, 3 mm wide. Male paratypes same as holotype; female paratype slightly longer than male (ca 28 mm long), broken into several pieces.

Coloration faded in alcohol, but two darker stripes still visible on each side of body. Head, antennae, legs and telson slightly brownish, ommatidia and medial part of frons dark brown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).

Head capsule with a median suture, this being especially distinct on labrum; ca 20 ommatidia located in an irregular oval cluster ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Labrum as usual, with three irregular teeth and a single row of 10–12 stout marginal setae. Clypeus with two setiferous foveolae on each side ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Incisura lateralis closed ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Antennal cavity/groove present, antennae shorter than body diameter. Relative lengths of antennomeres: 3=4=5<1<6<2 ( Fig. 2A, B View FIGURE 2 ). Terminal antennomere with four large sensory cones clustered together inside a membranous area. Antennomeres 5 and 6 each with an apicolateral field of specialized sensilla ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ).

Gnathochilarium as usual, of spirobolidan conformation. Stipites separated in basal portion, each bearing three apical setae, but not setose on ventral surface. Lamellae linguales separated by anterior portion of mentum ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ), each with two usual setae located behind one another, mentum devoid of a large swollen area apically between both lamellae linguales, but subdivided basally by a well-marked suture ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ).

Mandible: external tooth (et) large and prominent, inner tooth (it) with three smaller inner teeth, a thin lateral tooth (lt), five rows of pectinate lamellae (pl), molar plate (mp) with a few (2–3) transverse furrows ( Fig. 2E–G View FIGURE 2 ).

Collum, with a prominent groove along anterior margin, lateroventral margin broadly rounded, not extending ventrad as far as ventrolateral corner of body ring 2 ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ).

Body rings: Metazonae heavily crested/ribbed, crests being bimodal, slightly, but clearly concave in the middle ( Figs 1A, B View FIGURE 1 , 2H–K, M, N View FIGURE 2 ); mesozonae with longitudinal impressions, these being especially clearly visible ventrally; pre-anal ring with dorsal tip of epiproct clearly overhanging the paraprocts ( Fig. 2K View FIGURE 2 ); hypoproct rounded; anal valves well-rounded and devoid of spines or setae. Posterior margin of paraprocts in lateral view without distinct lips ( Figs 1D View FIGURE 1 , 2L View FIGURE 2 ). Ozopores (oz) small and inconspicuous, starting with ring 6 ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ), suture between putative pleurotergite and sternite visible. Pleurotergal tips of body ring 2 gaping ventrally, not connected to sternite; pleurotergal tips of body ring 3 fused to sternite and forming a complete ring. Pleurotergal tips of male body ring 7 fused ventrally. Limbus membranous, overtopped by a row of short, parallel and regularly spaced spinicles ( Fig. 2O View FIGURE 2 ).

Legs: Male leg-pairs 1 and 2 modified, coxae of legs 1 fused medially at base only, each prefemur of legs 2 with a small, unciform, basal projection ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 , hp). Midbody legs ca 0.5 x body diameter, with coxa as long as the other podomeres. Tarsus ventrally with three pairs of spines and apically with a pair of setiform spines ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Male tarsi 3 up to midbody legs with a tarsal pad not protruding past base of claw ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 , pa). Tarsal claw of male leg pair 1 normal in size, subequal to tarsal claws of postgonopodal legs ( Fig. 3A, B View FIGURE 3 ).

Anterior gonopods ( Fig. 3D–F View FIGURE 3 ) especially complex, clearly branched; sternite (st) elongated into a triangular process with a blunt tip; a paramedian pair of slender, membranous, acuminate, antero-apical processes (ap); coxite (cx1) subtending much of anterior gonopods; telopodites 2-segmented, each consisting of a smaller, roundish, basal telopoditomere (t1) and a much larger, higher, complex, lobe-shaped, distal telopoditomere (t2).

Posterior gonopods ( Fig. 3G–I View FIGURE 3 ) connected by a small, triangular, sclerotized sternite (st), clearly and rather regularly curved, slender, 2-segmented, both segments (a thicker and slightly longer coxite (cx2) and a more slender and shorter telopodite (tl) distinctly separated near midway subtransversely by a deep seminal groove; a rudimentary solenomere (sl) subapically. Sperm channel running at mesal margin of coxite through telopodite’s subapical part ( Fig. 3I View FIGURE 3 ).

Vulvae in the single female missing (apparently, removed and lost by Richard L. Hoffman at VNHM).

RMCA

Royal Museum for Central Africa

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF