Magadha intumescentia, Long, Jian-Kun, Yang, Lin & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2014

Long, Jian-Kun, Yang, Lin & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2014, A review of the genus Magadha Distant, 1906 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Achilidae), Zootaxa 3872 (3), pp. 235-256 : 244

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3872.3.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88E75695-DD70-44A0-A89C-2D9EFF204378

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6133763

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F1222322-FF9B-A76E-DBA8-1087A3FE2D0F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Magadha intumescentia
status

sp. nov.

Magadha intumescentia View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figs 33–50 View FIGURES 33 – 39 View FIGURES 40 – 50 )

Measurements. Body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewing): male 7.1 mm (n = 1), female 7.1–7.8 mm (n = 4); forewing length: male 6.1 mm (n = 1), female 6.1–6.6 mm (n = 4).

Coloration. Ivory-white to fuscous ( Figs 33–39 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Vertex yellowish brown, with 2 fuscous markings at lateral margins ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Frons fuscous, with 7 small ivory-white markings along lateral margin, base almost ivory-white, along median carina with irregular ivory-white markings, the largest marking near frontoclypeus suture ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Postclypeus with basal half ivory-white and apical half brown ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Genae fuscous, with 3 areas ivory-white as in Fig. 38 View FIGURES 33 – 39 . Eyes dark brown, ocellus ivory-white. Antennae and rostrum brown. Pronotum fuscous, except for area between lateral carinae, angle at ventral margin and 4 longitudinal bridges on the lateral lobe ivory-white ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Tegula with dorsal half pale yellowish brown and ventral half fuscous ( Figs 34, 36–37 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ). Mesonotum mainly fuscous ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 33 – 39 ), posterior two-thirds between lateral carinae with pale yellow dots. Forewing with basal twothirds opaque and apical third subdiaphanous, basal third mainly dark brown, middle third almost ivory-white, and apical third mainly pale gray ( Figs 33–36 View FIGURES 33 – 39 , 40 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ). Hindwing pale brown, veins dark brown. Legs brown, with apex of femur and base of tibiae pale yellowish brown. Abdomen dark brown.

Head and thorax. Ratio width of vertex from base to length in midline 1.8. Ratio length of frons in midline to maximum width 1.4, ratio maximum width to width at base 1.9. Ratio length of postclypeus in midline to length of frons 0.6. Ratio of apical to subapical segment of rostrum 1.5. Pronotum relatively short, lateral lobe with 4 longitudinal bridges, ratio length of pronotum in midline to length of vertex 0.6. Mesonotum in midline 7.5 times longer than pronotum, 2.8 times longer than pronotum and vertex combined. Forewing with ratio of length to maximum width 2.8. Hindwing with ratio of length to maximum width 1.8.

Male genitalia. Anal segment in dorsal view ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ) with ratio length to maximum width 1.2, apical margin broadly concave, lateroapical margin concave. Pygofer in lateral view ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ) with dorsal margin distinctly longer than ventral margin, the narrowest part at ventral third, anterior margin broadly concave; in ventral view ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ), medioventral process of pygofer entire and rectangular, with ratio length to width 1.8, along midline almost convex. Genital style distinctly longer than wide, with apex narrow, apical two-thirds of ventral margin relatively straight, 2 small processes arising from centre of dorsal margin and 1 larger process from near base of dorsal margin; inner surfaces near base with 1 fingerlike process, directed outwards ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ). Aedeagus with phallobase sheath-shaped and incompletely symmetrical ( Figs 47, 49–50 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ); in dorsal view ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ) dorsal lobe shorter than 2 lateral lobes, and with 2 processes rising from apical third, directed basad, the left process with one short blunt process and 2 spines at base, and the right one with only one sharp short process at base, the 2 lateral lobes bent toward each other apically; in ventral view ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ) ventral lobe slightly shorter than the lateral, with apical margin deeply cleft in the middle and with inside margins slightly carinal ventrad and shagreen at base. Suspensoria distinctly intumescent near anal segment ( Figs 43, 44 View FIGURES 40 – 50 )

Type material. Holotype: ♂, CHINA, Guizhou: Wangmo, Dayi, 21–22 Aug. 2012, S.-Y. Xu. Paratypes, Guizhou: 2 ♀♀, same data as holotype; 1 ♀, Dayi, Wangmo, 21–22 Aug. 2012, W.-C. Yang; 1 ♀, Dayi, Wangmo, 21–22 Aug. 2012, W.-B. Zheng.

Etymology. The species name is derived from the Latin words “ intumescentia ”, which indicates suspensoria distinctly intumescent ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 40 – 50 ).

Distribution. China (Guizhou).

Remarks. Magadha intumescentia is similar to M. pinnata but differs from the latter in: mesonotum dark brown (grayish brown in M. pinnata ); anal segment of male in dorsal view with lateroapical margin concave (lateroapical margin round convex in M. pinnata ); phallobase in dorsal view with dorsal lobe with only 2 small processes near the middle (with 2 large and 2 small processes in the middle in M. pinnata ), in ventral view with ventral lobe with apical margin deeply cleft in the middle (apical margin slightly incised in the middle in M. pinnata ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Achilidae

Genus

Magadha

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF