Paraxenos hungaricus ( Székessy, 1955 ), Palearctic
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.885.2197 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16930D00-0D5E-4080-9C2F-EFADE47DC4CD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8206028 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F0668782-FFEE-FFF5-FDF3-8F89FB22FDCF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paraxenos hungaricus ( Székessy, 1955 ) |
status |
|
Paraxenos hungaricus ( Székessy, 1955) View in CoL
Figs 3 View Fig , 4A–E View Fig , 5–6 View Fig View Fig
Pseudoxenos (Bembicixenos) hungaricus Székessy, 1955: 281 View in CoL (type locality: Hungary, Bugac).
Paraxenos (Bembicixenos) hungaricus View in CoL – Kinzelbach 1971: 162.
Diagnosis
Female cephalothorax
Differing from P. arabicus sp. nov. and P. krombeini in several characters. Maxilla cone-shaped, narrowing anteriorly like in P. krombeini , but blunt apically (mx, Fig. 6E View Fig ). Anteriorly directed, very slightly overlapping with mandible proximally. Maxillary base approximately 2–3× as wide as anterior part of maxilla (mxb, mx, Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Mandible enclosed in mandibular capsule like in P. arabicus , versus overtopping anterior edge of the head capsule in P. krombeini . Mandibular base flat, not divided by furrow from genal area. Labial area between maxillae distinctly wider than long in midline (lba, Fig. 6C View Fig ), versus slightly wider than long in P. arabicus (lba, Fig. 2A View Fig ). Dorsal labral field slightly arcuate (dlf, Fig. 6D View Fig ), versus distinctly arcuate in P. arabicus and P. krombeini . Mouth opening usually conspicuously sclerotized, but only indistinctly in P. arabicus . Lateral extensions of head capsule predominantly dull on ventral side, cuticle wrinkled, but shiny area near submaxillary groove without conspicuous dark papillae (lehc, Fig. 3C View Fig ; lehc, smxg, Fig. 6A View Fig ), versus lateral extensions completely dull and covered by dark papillae in P. arabicus . Dark lateral region of abdominal segment I below spiracles distinctly contrasting to pale thorax from dorsal side (asI, Fig. 3D View Fig ). Clypeal lobe slightly protruding from head capsule (cll, Fig. 3C View Fig ), but distinctly protruding in P. krombeini and P. arabicus .
Male cephalotheca
See the Diagnosis section under P. arabicus sp. nov.
Material examined
CZECH REPUBLIC • 1 MP; Bzenec env.; 12 Jun. 2015; M. Halada leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; NMPC .
HUNGARY • allotype ♀; Bugac env.; 30 Jul. 1941; Móczár leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; HNHM • 2 ♀♀; Agasegyháza env.; 15 Jul. 1956; Bajári leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; HNHM • 1 MP, 1 ♀; Agasegyháza env.; 16 Jul. 1956; Mihályi leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; HNHM • 1 MP, 1 ♀; Fülophaza env.; 17 Jul. 2013; J. Straka leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; NMPC • 1 ♀; Fülophaza env.; 12 Aug. 2011; P. Bogusch and J. Straka leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; NMPC .
IRAN • 1 ♀; Kerman, 20 km E of Ghobira ; 5 Jun. 2010; Mi. Halada leg.; host: Bembix sp. ; OLML .
ITALY • 1 MP; Sicilia, Mts S of Etna; 21 Jun. 2012; J. Halada leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; OLML • 3× 1 MP, 1 ♀; Sardinia, 30 km NW of Sassari ; 19 May 2013; J. Halada leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; NMPC .
KAZAKHSTAN • 1 MP; Lepsi env.; 20 Jun. 1995; M. Múčka leg.; host: Bembix sp. ; NMPC • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; hosts: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; OLML • 1 MP; 50 km S of Balkhash ; 28 Jun. 1992; K. Deneš leg.; host: Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; OLML • 1 empty male puparium (EMP), 2 EMP; Matai desert; 25 Jun. 1995; J. Halada and M. Múčka leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; OLML .
MONGOLIA • 3× 1 MP; Gobi , 70 km SE of Khatansuudal; 11 Jul. 2005; P. Tyrner leg.; host: Bembix sp. ; NMPC .
TURKEY • 1 MP; 40 km NE of Muradiye ; 5 Jul. 2000; M. Halada leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; OLML • 24× 1 ♀, 2× 2 ♀♀, 1 ♀, 1 EMP, 2 ♀♀, 1 MP, 6× 1 MP; 20 km W of Van ; 5 Jul. 1997; M. Halada leg.; host: Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; OLML .
Description
Female cephalothorax
SHAPE AND COLORATION. Compact, widened, slightly or distinctly wider than long. Size variable, length 1.28–1.93 mm, maximum width 1.68–2.57 mm. Anterior head margin slightly or scarcely protruding from head capsule. Thorax widening posteriorly. Cephalothorax displaying multiple light brown shades, only around mandible and mouth opening cuticle more sclerotized and darker, but lighter in central region, darker laterally.
HEAD CAPSULE. Approximately ⅓ to ½ as long as entire cephalothorax including lateral extensions. Coloration pale to dark, with specific pattern. Clypeal area distinctly or indistinctly separated from labral area, slightly protruding anteriorly or not protruding. Clypeal lobe blunt. Surface slightly wrinkled on dorsal side, reticulated. Lateral extensions of head capsule predominantly dull on ventral side, cuticle wrinkled, but shiny area near submaxillary groove lacking conspicuous dark papillae (lehc, Fig. 3C View Fig , lehc, smxg, Fig. 6A View Fig ). Clypeal sensilla present on ventral side of clypeus, mainly concentrated on clypeal lobe (cls, Fig. 6D View Fig ). Border between clypeal and frontal region indistinct, but still recognizable ( Fig. 5F View Fig ). Frontal region of head capsule distinctly wrinkled, not covered by dark papillae. Segmental border between head and prothorax indistinct on dorsal side, indicated by change in cuticular surface structure.
SUPRA-ANTENNAL SENSILLARY FIELD. Predominantly smooth or slightly wrinkled, with dispersed sensilla (sssf, Fig. 5C–D View Fig ), delimited by distinct furrow medially (fssf, Fig. 6B View Fig ).
ANTENNA. Preserved as cavity, rarely combined with rounded plates (a, Fig. 5C–D View Fig ). Antennal sensilla or vestigial setae missing. Periantennal area smooth, reduced when supra-antennal sensillary field almost reaches vestige of antennae (paa, ssf, Fig. 5C–D View Fig ).
LABRUM. Ventral field distinctly wider than long, elliptic or semicircular. Dorsal field slightly arcuate to nearly straight,> 4× as wide as long in midline. Dorsal field with about 24 setae inserted in deep sockets ( Fig. 6C–D View Fig ).
MANDIBLE. Anteromedially directed at an angle of 30–35°, enclosed in mandibular capsule. Mandibular bulge not distinctly raised, with ca 12–18 sensilla (mdbs, Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Cuticle completely smooth anteriorly, but posteroventrally sculptured, reticulated. Mandibular tooth slightly widened, pointed apically, anteriorly directed, armed with distinct spines (mdt, mdts, Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Mandibular base flat, not divided by furrow from genal area.
MAXILLA. Well-developed, prominent and separated from labial area. Cuticle smooth. Maxilla cone-shaped, wide at base, but narrowing distally, maxillary base approximately 2–3× as wide as distal part (mxb, mx, Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Anteriorly directed, very slightly overlapping with mandible proximally. Vestige of palp present, with more or less distinct plates, located anteriorly on ventral side of maxilla. Additional sensilla present on ventral maxillary surface (mxs, Fig. 6E–F View Fig ). Submaxillary groove distinctly produced posterolaterally (smxg, Fig. 6A View Fig ).
LABIUM. Labial area between maxillae distinct, delimited anteriorly by mouth opening and posteriorly by birth opening. Distinctly wider than long in midline, rectangular, flat. Cuticular surface very slightly wrinkled, reticulated.
MOUTH OPENING. Mouth opening straight or bi-arcuate, sclerotized along margin.
THORAX. Pro-mesothoracic and meso-metathoracic borders distinct on ventral side, separated by mesal furrows (sbpm, sbmm, Fig. 3C View Fig ). Border on dorsal side indistinct, indicated by different cuticular sculpture. Border between metathorax and abdomen formed by ridge in combination with changed cuticular sculpture and coloration. Cuticle of thoracic segments reticulate on ventral side, with small, scattered pigmented papillae. Prosternal extension variable, differentiated by cuticular sculpture and coloration (pst, Fig. 3C View Fig ). Anterior part usually darker, with more or less distinct pigmented papillae medially. Posterior part usually pale and without conspicuous pigmented papillae. Meso- and metathorax unmodified in shape, transverse. Posteromedial pale area on mesosternum and metasternum variable in shape, in some specimens indistinct (mst, mtst, Fig. 3C View Fig ). Dorsal side of thorax smooth or slightly reticulated.
ABDOMINAL SEGMENT I AND SPIRACLES. Lateral region of abdominal segment I below spiracles conspicuously darkened on dorsal side, contrasting to pale thorax (asI, Fig. 3D View Fig ). Spiracles on posterior half of cephalothorax slightly elevated, with lateral or laterodorsal orientation.
Male cephalotheca
SHAPE AND COLORATION. In frontal view rounded, slightly flattened, elliptic, length 0.63–0.78 mm, width 1.23–1.53 mm, in lateral view protruding anteriorly, pointed apically. Coloration forming pattern of pale and dark shades ( Fig. 4A–B View Fig ).
CEPHALOTHECAL CAPSULE. Compound eyes visible, pale to dark, with dark individual cornea lenses. Gena completely pale except dark area around mandibular base; pale area between compound eye and mandibular base narrowed (nearly as wide as diameter of compound eye) (gn, coe, Fig. 4A View Fig ). Clypeus pale medially (on clypeal lobe) and darker laterally. Clypeus (clypeal lobe) straight in frontal view, prominent in lateral view, but blunt apically (cl, Fig. 4B View Fig ). Clypeal lobe distinctly wider than mandibular length (cll, Fig. 4E View Fig ). Clypeal sensilla mainly concentrated on clypeal lobe, visible or indistinct ( Fig. 4A, E View Fig ). Frontal region with paired furrow of supra-antennal sensillary field, lacking impression or occipital bulge (fssf, Fig. 4A–E View Fig ). Diameter of genae between maxillary base and compound eye approximately 2× as large as diameter of vestigial antenna.
SUPRA-ANTENNAL SENSILLARY FIELD. Dark (ssf, Fig. 4A, E View Fig ), kidney-shaped and bulging, delimited medially by distinct furrow. Furrows wide, not connected anteriorly. Dark sensilla visible ( Fig. 4E View Fig ).
ANTENNA. Of standard shape, dark, small, with small plates or sensilla and complete torulus (a, Fig. 4A, E View Fig ). Periantennal area dark, not clearly delimited from supra-antennal sensillary field.
LABRUM. Labral area distinct. Dorsal field pale or dark, with dispersed setae visible. Ventral field conspicuously darkened (dlf, Fig. 4E View Fig ).
MANDIBLE. Nearly medially directed. Tooth inconspicuous, apically pointed, wide basally, but not reaching area of mandibular bulge. Coloration pale with darker parts. Mandibular bulge with sensilla, separated from pointed tooth. Distance between mandibles very distinctly exceeding mandibular length ( Fig. 4E View Fig ).
MAXILLA. Distinct, prominent, with darker and paler parts. Vestige of palp present, conspicuous (mxp, Fig. 4A, E View Fig ). Wide at base, approximately 2× as wide as mandible (mx, Fig. 4A, E View Fig ).
LABIUM AND HYPOPHARYNX. Labium distinct between and below maxillae, darker. Praementum and postmentum almost completely fused, indistinctly separated by furrow. Hypopharyngeal protuberance present or absent (hyp, Fig. 4E View Fig ).
MOUTH OPENING. Visible, not covered by ventral labral field, slightly arcuate, sclerotized around margin.
Hosts
Bembix oculata Panzer, 1801 ; Bembix rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ; Bembix sp. ( Kinzelbach 1978; Benda et al. 2022b).
Distribution
Palearctic: Czech Republic; Germany; Hungary; Italy; Mongolia; Spain ( Székessy 1955; Kinzelbach 1978; Benda et al. 2021); Turkey ( Benda et al. 2022b); Iran; Kazakhstan (this tudy).
NMPC |
Czech Republic, Prague, National Museum (Natural History) |
HNHM |
Hungary, Budapest, Hungarian Natural History Museum |
OLML |
Austria, Linz, Oberoesterreichisches Landesmuseum |
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
HNHM |
Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum) |
OLML |
Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paraxenos hungaricus ( Székessy, 1955 )
Benda, Daniel, Pohl, Hans, Nakase, Yuta, Beutel, Rolf & Straka, Jakub 2023 |
Paraxenos (Bembicixenos) hungaricus
Kinzelbach R. 1971: 162 |
Pseudoxenos (Bembicixenos) hungaricus Székessy, 1955: 281
Szekessy V. 1955: 281 |