Sciopemyia apicalis Chaves Júnior, Shimabukuro & Andrade, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54F044B5-E7CC-44F1-B1F2-CF3A717289B9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7198740 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F00D87CA-B275-3734-FF1A-6571FDB1FE30 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sciopemyia apicalis Chaves Júnior, Shimabukuro & Andrade |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sciopemyia apicalis Chaves Júnior, Shimabukuro & Andrade View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs 5–6 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )
Diagnosis. Male: preapical papilla on flagellomere III present; gonocoxite without basal tuft of setae; flagellomere I ≥ 405 µm; aedeagal ducts ≤ 440 µm; epandrial lobe ≤ 157 µm; presence of one apical spine and upper external spine at the apical level in the gonostyle.
Male holotype. Head ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ) 330 (320–330, n = 6) in length, 264 (255–304, n = 6) in width. Arrangement of deciduous bristles in the occiput region forming an “X” shape; clypeus 119 (107–118, n = 7) in length; eyes 154 (133–159, n = 6) in length, 96 (70–93, n = 6) in width; interocular distance 122 (101–125, n = 5). Pharynx with streaks and no teeth ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Cibarium without teeth ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Labrum-epipharynx ( LE) 136 (142–148, n = 6) ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Incomplete antenna on type specimen, description based on paratype (Nº 32847). Flagellomere XIII and FXIV absent in all specimens. Antenna ( Figs 5D–F View FIGURE 5 , 6A–I View FIGURE 6 ): flagellomere length (F): FI 442 (349–474, n = 6), FII 225 (172–228, n = 6), FIII 229 (172–228, n = 6), FXIII (lost), FXIV (lost). Ascoids: with short posterior spur and atrophied peduncle, anterior spur is long in FI and reaches the level of the preapical papilla ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) but does not reach FII; ascoids: implanted at the same level as the internal; flagellomere FX, FXI and FXII absent in type specimen, description based on paratype (Nº 32847). Presence of preapical papilla on FI– FIII ( Figs 5D–F View FIGURE 5 ); papilla absent on FIV–FVI ( Figs 6A–C View FIGURE 6 ); presence of one papilla on FVII, FVIII and FIX ( Figs 6D–F View FIGURE 6 ), two papillae on FX ( Fig. 6G View FIGURE 6 ), three papillae on FXI ( Fig. 6H View FIGURE 6 ); presence of four papillae on FXII ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ); spiniform preapical papilla on FIX ( Fig. 6F View FIGURE 6 ) and FXI ( Figs 6H View FIGURE 6 ). Presence of simple setae on FVII – FXII ( Figs 6A–I View FIGURE 6 ). Palpi (P) ( Fig. 5G View FIGURE 5 ), palpal segment length: PI 32 (29–35, n = 6), PII 58 (55–64, n = 6), PIII 101 (92–116, n = 6), PIV 61 (64–70, n = 6) and PV 128 (107–130, n = 5). Palpal formula: 1-2-4-3-5 (n = 5); PIII with Newstead’s sensilla scattered along the segment ( Fig. 5G View FIGURE 5 ). Labial suture complete ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ) .
Cervix. Ventro-cervical sensilla absent. Cervical sclerites bearing a pair of spiniform sensilla.
Thorax. Mesonotum 409 (372–457, n = 6) in length; pronotoum, anepisternum, metanotum and postnotum light brown, paratergite and pleura off–white. One proepimeral setae; 9–11 upper anepisternal setae. Setae present on the anterior margin of the katepisternum. Wing ( Fig. 6J View FIGURE 6 ): 1,794 (1,461 –1,905, n = 5) in length, 445 (416–525, n = 5) in width; veins: R 5 1,091 (1,036 –1,128, n = 5); alfa 399 (320–404, n = 5); beta 246 (197–284, n = 5); gamma 197 (194–255, n = 5); delta 90 (41–113, n = 5); pi 95 (51–117, n = 5). Legs (anterior, median, posterior): Coxae: 279 (288–316, n = 6), 279 (288–302, n = 6), 279 (293–316, n = 6); Femur: 759 (642–774, n = 3), 715 (598–737, n = 5), 723 (657–795, n = 4); Tibia: 1,147 (943–1,221, n = 3), 1,258 (1,091 –1,406, n = 5), 1,276 (1,147 –1,480, n = 3); Tarsomere I: 672 (591–723, n = 3), 715 (650–803, n = 5), 752 (679–854, n = 3). Sum of tarsomeres II+IV+V (anterior, median, posterior): 644 (584–679, n = 3), 693 (605–715, n = 5), 715 (657–715, n = 3).
Abdomen: 1,720 (1,128 –1,720, n = 6) in length; tergal papillae absent. Terminalia ( Fig. 6K View FIGURE 6 ): gonocoxite 154 (145–154, n = 6) in length, 58 (52–61, n = 6) in width, without basal tuft of setae. Gonostyle 136 (122–133, n = 7) in length, without preapical seta and with four spines: one apical, one upper external that migrates towards the apex, one lower external, and one internal spine. The four spines are well-developed. The lower external spine is located at a level closer to the apex spines than the internal. Internal spine located in the apical third of the gonostylus. Paramere ( Fig. 6K View FIGURE 6 ): dorsal margin 110 (90–133, n = 6) and ventral 128 (124–159, n = 6) in length; the basal level of the bristles in the dorsal margin reaches the apical level of the implantation of the bristles in the ventral margin ( Fig. 6K View FIGURE 6 ). Parameral sheath sclerotized and coniform. Epandrial lobe 154 (145–177, n = 6) in length, 29 (20–38, n = 6) in width and rounded at the apex. Sperm pump ( Fig. 6L View FIGURE 6 ) 130 (101–130, n = 6); ejaculatory apodeme 96 (81–101, n = 6); aedeagal ducts with bevelled apex ( Fig. 6L View FIGURE 6 ), 394 (375–414, n = 6) in length and 3 (3, n = 6) in width; 2,7 times the length of sperm pump. Cercus 96 (107–130, n = 6) in length and 43 (40–58, n = 6) in width.
Material examined: Holotype (Nº 32827) and two paratypes (Nº 32832, 32847). Capture location: Fazenda São Geraldo, house of Mr. José Marques dos Santos, municipality of Monsenhor Paulo (21°45′30.14″ S, 45°32′22.15″ W), state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Collection date: uninformed. Trap: uninformed, Collectors: Antônio Leôncio and Eduardo. Identified as Lu. nordestina GoogleMaps . Paratypes from other locations: 1 male (Nº 49201). Capture location: Engenho de São Francisco da Várzea (8º03′27″ S, 34º57′52″ W), municipality of Recife, state of Pernambuco, Brazil GoogleMaps . Collection date: 24/ix/1974, from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Trap: manual capture in wild animal burrows (termites) in closed florest. Collectors: João Evangelista da Silva. Determined by Amilcar Vianna Martins as L. nordestina in October 1974. 1 male (Nº 64671). Capture location: “Sítio do Sr. Alencar” municipality of Maranguapé (3º52′58.62″ S, 38º40′36.20″ W), state of Ceará, Brazil GoogleMaps . Collection date: 17/x/1983, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Trap: Manual capture in uninhabited shelters approximately 3 m away from the water collection, feeding on frogs. Collectors: Edelberto Santos Dias. Determined by Alda Lima Falcão and Armando Lemos Ribeiro as L. nordestina . 1 male (Nº 71674). Capture location: municipality of Monte do Carmo (Nº 10º47′12.71″ S, 48º00′03.70″ W), state of Tocantins, Brazil GoogleMaps . Collection date: i/1998. Trap: uninformed. Collector: W. A. Andrade. 1 male (Nº 86806). Capture location: Caverna Hall two of Caverna do Arrebenta Bomba, localized in the municipality of Lassance (17º53′22.31″ S, 44º34′53.63″ W), state of Minas Gerais, Brazil GoogleMaps . Collection date: 15/iv/2008, from 2:00 p.m. (16/iv/2008) to 2:00 p.m.(17/iv/2008). Trap: uninformed. Collector: uninformed. Determined by Gustavo Mayr de Lima Carvalho as Lu. sordellii in May 2008. Material deposited in the FIOCRUZ/COLFLEB.
Female: Unknown.
Etymology: the species name refers to the position of the upper external spine, which is located more at the apex of the gonostyle, different from the males of Sc. sordellii .
Distribution: BRAZIL. Ceará: Maranguapé; Minas Gerais: Lassance, Monsenhor Paulo, Nova Lima; Pernambuco: Recife; Tocantins: Monte do Carmo .
Medical importance: Studies have not yet been conducted on this species regarding vector competence or capacity, or natural infection by parasites.
LE |
Servico de Microbiologia e Imunologia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |